Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1873–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Oles v. Plummergreen1 sentence1990See Morris v. Weigle (1978), 270 Ind. 121 , 383 N.E.3d 341 (29.7% was found to be substantial and not within the minimal equity exception of Skendgel), Oles v. Plummer (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 879, 882 (payments equal to 80.55% of the contract price and 18.6% of the principal was considered substantial, and the remedy permitted upon the buyer's default was foreclosure); See also, Looney, 794 F.2d at 312. | 1 | 1 |
Morris v. Weiglegreen1 sentence1990See Morris v. Weigle (1978), 270 Ind. 121 , 383 N.E.3d 341 (29.7% was found to be substantial and not within the minimal equity exception of Skendgel), Oles v. Plummer (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 879, 882 (payments equal to 80.55% of the contract price and 18.6% of the principal was considered substantial, and the remedy permitted upon the buyer's default was foreclosure); See also, Looney, 794 F.2d at 312. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Middelkamp v. Hanewich
green
2 sentences1994In MiddelKamp v. Hanewich (1977), 173 Ind.App. 571 , 364 N.E.2d 1024 , this court wrote: "The first test for a compulsory counterclaim is whether it '[arose] out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject-matter of the opposing party's claim. ...' The test for compulsoriness is a logical relationship test, as stated by the United States Supreme Court in a case under the former equity rule from which federal rule 18(a) was derived: '"Transaction" is a word of flexible meaning. 1994In MiddelKamp v. Hanewich (1977), 173 Ind.App. 571 , 364 N.E.2d 1024 , this court wrote: "The first test for a compulsory counterclaim is whether it '[arose] out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject-matter of the opposing party's claim. ...' The test for compulsoriness is a logical relationship test, as stated by the United States Supreme Court in a case under the former equity rule from which federal rule 18(a) was derived: '"Transaction" is a word of flexible meaning. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Attebery v. Attebery
green
1 sentence1987Similarly, in Attebery v. Attebery (1974), Mo.App., 507 S.W.2d 87 , a wife sought indemnity from her husband for sums she had expended for her necessaries. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Curtis v. Sutter
green
1 sentence1895Curtis v. Suteer, 15 Cal. 259 ; Green v. Glynn, 71 Ind. 336 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Green v. Glynn
neutral
1 sentence1895Curtis v. Suteer, 15 Cal. 259 ; Green v. Glynn, 71 Ind. 336 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Ragsdale v. Mitchell
neutral
1 sentence1895In Ragsdale v. Mitchell, 97 Ind. 458 (461), it was said: “The action to quiet title, provided by the statute, is an ■extension of the equity doctrine, which settled titles under a proceeding called a bill of peace. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Pendleton v. Perkins
green
1 sentence1892Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565 ; Johnson v. Waters, 111 U. S. 640 ; Hartshorn v. Eames, 91 Me. 93 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Johnson v. Waters
green
1 sentence1892Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565 ; Johnson v. Waters, 111 U. S. 640 ; Hartshorn v. Eames, 91 Me. 93 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Bane v. Travelers' Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1890Co., 85 Ky. 677 , is opposed to the case last mentioned, but we think counsel are in error, for the Kentucky court puts its decision upon the ground that the assured had not earned the wages which he assumed to assign, and declares that in this respect the case differs from Lyon v. Travellers’ Ins. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Hastings v. Dickinson
green
1 sentence1888Gibson v. Gibson, 15 Mass. 110 , and Hastings v. Dickinson, 7 Mass. 153 , are placed solely on the statute of Henry VIII, and were decided as strictly common law cases, without reference to the equity rule, which, both in England and America, has long been different from the rigid rule of the common law. | 1 | 1888–1888 |
Erwin v. Fulk
neutral
1 sentence1885Erwin v. Fulk, 94 Ind. 235 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Reynolds v. Quaely
neutral
1 sentence1882In Reynolds v. Quaeley, 18 Kan. 361 , the doctrine is carried so far as to hold that although the assignment is after action, brought, the assignee must prosecute the action, and that the: assignor’s administrator can not continue the prosecution. | 1 | 1882–1882 |
Bird v. Lanius
neutral
1 sentence1873In the subsequent case of Bird v. Lanius, 7 Ind. 615 , the equity rule was recognized as being in force in the State, and it was held that a promise by one to another, for the benefit of a third party, could be enforced by the latter. | 1 | 1873–1873 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.