10 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waller v. Georgiagreen2 sentences1990See id. (citation omitted) (“The outcome frequently depends on a resolution of factual matters.”). 1987See id. (citation omitted) (“The outcome frequently depends on a resolution of factual matters.”). | 2 | 2 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lawsongreen2 sentences2012Id. at 577 , 933 A.2d at 866 (“[The client] was still entitled to a timely response to his specific question.”). 2012Id. at 577 , 933 A.2d at 866 (“[The client] was still entitled to a timely response to his specific question.”). | 1 | 1 |
Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.green2 sentences2006The Armstrong III court emphasized the fact-finding process as the most weighty criterion, id. at 668-69 , 906 A.2d at 423 (quoting Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686, 712 , 376 A.2d 483, 497 (1977)). 2006The Armstrong III court emphasized the fact-finding process as the most weighty criterion, id. at 668-69 , 906 A.2d at 423 (quoting Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686, 712 , 376 A.2d 483, 497 (1977)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of Baltimore
green
2 sentences2016In Overpak, 395 Md. at 33 , 909 A.2d at 245 , we recounted the standard for determining whether an act is legislative or quasi-judicial in nature: The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. 2016In Overpak, 395 Md. at 33 , 909 A.2d at 245 , we recounted the standard for determining whether an act is legislative or quasi-judicial in nature: The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. | 2 | 2016–2019 |
Kenwood Gardens Condominiums, Inc. v. Whalen Properties, LLC
green
2 sentences2019To that end, this Court has developed a "standard for determining whether an act is legislative or quasi-judicial in nature[,]" which we recently reiterated in Kenwood , 449 Md. at 332 , 144 A.3d at 659 , stating: The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. 2019To that end, this Court has developed a "standard for determining whether an act is legislative or quasi-judicial in nature[,]" which we recently reiterated in Kenwood , 449 Md. at 332 , 144 A.3d at 659 , stating: The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Debbas v. Nelson
green
2 sentences2012Debbas v. Nelson, 389 Md. 364, 373 , 885 A.2d 802 (2005) (quoting Todd v. Mass Transit Admin., 373 Md. 149, 155 , 816 A.2d 930 (2003)). 2012Debbas v. Nelson, 389 Md. 364, 373 , 885 A.2d 802 (2005) (quoting Todd v. Mass Transit Admin., 373 Md. 149, 155 , 816 A.2d 930 (2003)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Todd v. Mass Transit Administration
green
2 sentences2012Debbas v. Nelson, 389 Md. 364, 373 , 885 A.2d 802 (2005) (quoting Todd v. Mass Transit Admin., 373 Md. 149, 155 , 816 A.2d 930 (2003)). 2012Debbas v. Nelson, 389 Md. 364, 373 , 885 A.2d 802 (2005) (quoting Todd v. Mass Transit Admin., 373 Md. 149, 155 , 816 A.2d 930 (2003)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Armstrong v. Mayor of Baltimore
green
2 sentences2006The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property, 169 Md.App. at 666-69 , 906 A.2d at 422-23 ; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. 169 Md.App. at 668-71 , 906 A.2d at 423-24 . 2006The outcome of the analysis of whether a given act is quasi-judicial in nature is guided by two criteria: (1) the act or decision is reached on individual, as opposed to general, grounds, and scrutinizes a single property, 169 Md.App. at 666-69 , 906 A.2d at 422-23 ; and (2) there is a deliberative fact-finding process with testimony and the weighing of evidence. 169 Md.App. at 668-71 , 906 A.2d at 423-24 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Lodowski v. State
green
2 sentences2005Lodowski, 307 Md. at 258 , 513 A.2d 299 . 2005Lodowski, 307 Md. at 258 , 513 A.2d 299 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Martinez v. State
green
2 sentences1991Martinez v. State, 309 Md. 124, 143 , 522 A.2d 950 (1987) (emphasis in original). 1991Martinez v. State, 309 Md. 124, 143 , 522 A.2d 950 (1987) (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Pack
green
2 sentences1982The Court recognized that this was not the normal Peco-type situation, where the agency sought to protect its own administrative decision — that, unlike zoning and liquor boards, "the Subsequent Injury Fund does have a direct interest in the outcome of the hearing, viz. the Commission is authorized to award the claimant compensation from the Fund, which award might possibly be the result of an erroneous application of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.” Id. at 310 . 1982The Court also noted, however, that "there is a very real distinction between being aggrieved by a decision, and having a status cognizable in law as able to present a grievance.” Id. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.