outcome hearing (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

outcome hearing in Georgia

14 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

CaseFollowedCited
In the Interest of S. P.green
gactapp · 2006 · cited in 3 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2020
2 sentences

2014See also In the Interest of S. P., 282 Ga. App. 82, 85 (3) ( 637 SE2d 802 ) (2006) (mother in deprivation proceeding was not entitled to reversal because she did not show any harm based on her absence from hearing, as she did not demonstrate what evidence she would have provided that would have changed the outcome of the hearing).

2014See also In the Interest of S. P., 282 Ga. App. 82, 85 (3) ( 637 SE2d 802 ) (2006) (mother in deprivation proceeding was not entitled to reversal because she did not show any harm based on her absence from hearing, as she did not demonstrate what evidence she would have provided that would have changed the outcome of the hearing).

33
Lemming v. Stategreen
gactapp · 2008 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See Lemming, 292 Ga. App. at 141 (1).

2013See Lemming, 10 292 Ga. App. at 141 (1).

22
Hite v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Brookins argues that it was error for the trial court to permit the State to present evidence against a possible finding of 117, 124 (2) n.3 ( 829 SE2d 367 ) (2019); Hite, 208 Ga. App. at 269-270 (1)-(2) (assuming an error to be of constitutional magnitude, concluding that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and then deciding a related ineffective assistance of counsel claim under the reasonable probability of a different outcome standard).

11
S. Housmans & Co. v. Heilbrongreen
ga · 1857 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015But once the Association voluntarily dismissed its only remaining claim, the Marinos prevailed, regardless of their counterclaims, “by not having any relief imposed against them.”31 In its order denying the Marinos’ claim for attorney fees, the trial court characterized our holding in Marino I as having “found that Plaintiff had a separate, viable claim against Defendants and that the outcome of such claim would determine 23 Ga. 186, 186 ( 429 SE2d 661 ) (1993). 30 Benchmark Builders, Inc. v. Schultz, 294 Ga. 12, 14 ( 751 SE2d 45 ) (2013) (punctuation omitted) (emphasis in original). 31 Id. (e

11
Benchmark Builders, Inc. v. Schultzgreen
ga · 2013 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015But once the Association voluntarily dismissed its only remaining claim, the Marinos prevailed, regardless of their counterclaims, “by not having any relief imposed against them.”31 In its order denying the Marinos’ claim for attorney fees, the trial court characterized our holding in Marino I as having “found that Plaintiff had a separate, viable claim against Defendants and that the outcome of such claim would determine 23 Ga. 186, 186 ( 429 SE2d 661 ) (1993). 30 Benchmark Builders, Inc. v. Schultz, 294 Ga. 12, 14 ( 751 SE2d 45 ) (2013) (punctuation omitted) (emphasis in original). 31 Id. (e

2015But once the Association voluntarily dismissed its only remaining claim, the Marinos prevailed, regardless of their counterclaims, “by not having any relief imposed against them.”31 In its order denying the Marinos’ claim for attorney fees, the trial court characterized our holding in Marino I as having “found that Plaintiff had a separate, viable claim against Defendants and that the outcome of such claim would determine 23 Ga. 186, 186 ( 429 SE2d 661 ) (1993). 30 Benchmark Builders, Inc. v. Schultz, 294 Ga. 12, 14 ( 751 SE2d 45 ) (2013) (punctuation omitted) (emphasis in original). 31 Id. (e

11
Duke Galish, LLC v. Arnall Golden Gregory, LLPgreen
gactapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011“In a case where a plaintiffs pending claims remain viable despite the attorney’s alleged negligence, the plaintiff severs proximate causation by settling the case, an act which makes it impossible for his lawsuit to terminate in his favor.” Duke Galish, LLC v. Arnall Golden Gregory, LLP, 288 Ga. App. 75, 76, n. 3 ( 653 SE2d 791 ) (2007).

2011“In a case where a plaintiffs pending claims remain viable despite the attorney’s alleged negligence, the plaintiff severs proximate causation by settling the case, an act which makes it impossible for his lawsuit to terminate in his favor.” Duke Galish, LLC v. Arnall Golden Gregory, LLP, 288 Ga. App. 75, 76, n. 3 ( 653 SE2d 791 ) (2007).

11
Cook v. Stategreen
ga · 1999 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008Cook, 270 Ga. at 827 (2).

11
Clements v. Fletchergreen
ga · 1925 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988See also Clements v. Fletcher, 161 Ga. 21 ( 129 SE 846 ) (1925).

1988See also Clements v. Fletcher, 161 Ga. 21 ( 129 SE 846 ) (1925).

11
Central State Hospital v. Jamesgreen
gactapp · 1978 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
2 sentences

1982The outcome of this claim is controlled by [Central State Hospital v. James, 147 Ga. App. at 309 (1) (a), supra], as interpreted in Carriers Insurance Company v. Myers, 151 Ga. App. 674 (1979), and Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Heath, 152 Ga. App. 185 (1979).” There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the Full Board as to compensability under Central State Hospital v. James, supra. Accordingly, the Board’s superfluous reference in its award to Certain v. U. S. Fidelity &c.

1982The outcome of this claim is controlled by [Central State Hospital v. James, 147 Ga. App. at 309 (1) (a), supra], as interpreted in Carriers Insurance Company v. Myers, 151 Ga. App. 674 (1979), and Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Heath, 152 Ga. App. 185 (1979).” There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the Full Board as to compensability under Central State Hospital v. James, supra. Accordingly, the Board’s superfluous reference in its award to Certain v. U. S. Fidelity &c.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Burns green
ga · 2019
1 sentence

2022Brookins argues that it was error for the trial court to permit the State to present evidence against a possible finding of 117, 124 (2) n.3 ( 829 SE2d 367 ) (2019); Hite, 208 Ga. App. at 269-270 (1)-(2) (assuming an error to be of constitutional magnitude, concluding that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and then deciding a related ineffective assistance of counsel claim under the reasonable probability of a different outcome standard).

12022–2022
Thornton v. Hemphill green
gactapp · 2009
1 sentence

2020In view of the trial court’s credibility determinations, Swearngin has not shown that any error with the trial court’s admission of the metadata printouts “would have changed the outcome of the hearing, and therefore has failed to show that it was harmful.” Id.

12020–2020
Hutchinson v. COMPOSITE STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS green
ga · 1993
1 sentence

2015But once the Association voluntarily dismissed its only remaining claim, the Marinos prevailed, regardless of their counterclaims, “by not having any relief imposed against them.”31 In its order denying the Marinos’ claim for attorney fees, the trial court characterized our holding in Marino I as having “found that Plaintiff had a separate, viable claim against Defendants and that the outcome of such claim would determine 23 Ga. 186, 186 ( 429 SE2d 661 ) (1993). 30 Benchmark Builders, Inc. v. Schultz, 294 Ga. 12, 14 ( 751 SE2d 45 ) (2013) (punctuation omitted) (emphasis in original). 31 Id. (e

12015–2015
In the Interest of B. B. green
gactapp · 2004
2 sentences

2009See In the Interest of J.H.; [11] In the Interest of B.B., supra, 267 Ga.App. at 361(1), 599 S.E.2d 304 ; In the Interest of D.S.R. [12] Accordingly, the juvenile court's ruling does not require reversal.

2009See In the Interest of J.H.; [11] In the Interest of B.B., supra, 267 Ga.App. at 361(1), 599 S.E.2d 304 ; In the Interest of D.S.R. [12] Accordingly, the juvenile court's ruling does not require reversal.

12009–2009
Carriers Insurance v. Myers green
gactapp · 1979
1 sentence

1982The outcome of this claim is controlled by [Central State Hospital v. James, 147 Ga. App. at 309 (1) (a), supra], as interpreted in Carriers Insurance Company v. Myers, 151 Ga. App. 674 (1979), and Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Heath, 152 Ga. App. 185 (1979).” There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the Full Board as to compensability under Central State Hospital v. James, supra. Accordingly, the Board’s superfluous reference in its award to Certain v. U. S. Fidelity &c.

11982–1982
Employers Fire Insurance v. Heath neutral
gactapp · 1979
1 sentence

1982The outcome of this claim is controlled by [Central State Hospital v. James, 147 Ga. App. at 309 (1) (a), supra], as interpreted in Carriers Insurance Company v. Myers, 151 Ga. App. 674 (1979), and Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Heath, 152 Ga. App. 185 (1979).” There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the Full Board as to compensability under Central State Hospital v. James, supra. Accordingly, the Board’s superfluous reference in its award to Certain v. U. S. Fidelity &c.

11982–1982
United States v. Agurs red
scotus · 1976
1 sentence

1980United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97 (96 SC 2392, 49 LE2d 342) (1976).

11980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

GA § 5-6-34 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TN 352 (2004–2026) NY 223 (1920–2025) CA 100 (1940–2026) IL 71 (1974–2026) OR 50 (1971–2026) OH 46 (1996–2026) TX 36 (1952–2026) PA 33 (1980–2026) WA 32 (1978–2026) MI 27 (1907–2026) NJ 24 (1974–2026) NC 21 (1986–2026) CT 19 (1969–2026) KY 18 (1980–2026) WI 18 (1981–2024) IN 15 (1973–2026) UT 15 (2010–2026) CO 15 (1987–2026) FL 14 (1970–2025) GA 14 (1980–2022) MO 13 (1968–2024) MN 12 (1983–2025) IA 10 (1976–2018) MA 10 (1916–2023) MD 10 (1982–2019) VT 10 (1959–2024) KS 10 (1989–2022) AZ 9 (1974–2021) DC 9 (1980–2019) AR 8 (1984–2022) HI 8 (1971–2026) WV 7 (1969–2025) RI 6 (1973–2024) AL 6 (1981–2013) ME 6 (1999–2026) NM 6 (1994–2020) OK 5 (1915–2020) NV 5 (1985–2021) AK 5 (1983–2019) ID 5 (1993–2024) VA 5 (2002–2025) SC 4 (1925–2007) MT 4 (1932–2015) NH 4 (1989–2016) SD 3 (1986–2026) ND 3 (2016–2018) MS 3 (1963–2011) WY 2 (1995–2012) NE 2 (2016–2022) LA 2 (2002–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check