Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ward v. Kansasgreen1 sentence2022See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 569 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 (2012) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Californiared2 sentences2022See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 569 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 (2012) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. 2022See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 569 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 (2012) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2022See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 569 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 (2012) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. 2022See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 569 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 (2012) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Denneygreen2 sentences2017See State v. Denney, 283 Kan. 781, 789 , 156 P.3d 1275 (2007) (describing 11 "clear" statutory procedure); Haddock, 282 Kan. at 495 (referring to the statute's "mandatory dispositions"). 2017See State v. Denney, 283 Kan. 781, 789 , 156 P.3d 1275 (2007) (describing 11 "clear" statutory procedure); Haddock, 282 Kan. at 495 (referring to the statute's "mandatory dispositions"). | 1 | 1 |
Haddock v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See State v. Denney, 283 Kan. 781, 789 , 156 P.3d 1275 (2007) (describing 11 "clear" statutory procedure); Haddock, 282 Kan. at 495 (referring to the statute's "mandatory dispositions"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Marshall
green
2 sentences2016Bridges, 297 Kan. at 1012 (citing Marshall, 294 Kan. at 857 ).” State v. Akins, 298 Kan. 592, 599 , 315 P.3d 868 (2014). *601 Should the appellate court find error, it then must determine whether the misconduct meets the dual standard of constitutional and statutory harmless error. 2015Bridges, 297 Kan. at 1012 (citing Marshall, 294 Kan. at 857 ).” State v. Akins, 298 Kan. 592, 599 , 315 P.3d 868 (2014). | 3 | 2014–2016 |
State v. Bridges
green
2 sentences2016Bridges, 297 Kan. at 1012 (citing Marshall, 294 Kan. at 857 ).” State v. Akins, 298 Kan. 592, 599 , 315 P.3d 868 (2014). *601 Should the appellate court find error, it then must determine whether the misconduct meets the dual standard of constitutional and statutory harmless error. 2015Bridges, 297 Kan. at 1012 (citing Marshall, 294 Kan. at 857 ).” State v. Akins, 298 Kan. 592, 599 , 315 P.3d 868 (2014). | 3 | 2014–2016 |
State v. Akins
green
2 sentences2016Bridges, 297 Kan. at 1012 (citing Marshall, 294 Kan. at 857 ).” State v. Akins, 298 Kan. 592, 599 , 315 P.3d 868 (2014). *601 Should the appellate court find error, it then must determine whether the misconduct meets the dual standard of constitutional and statutory harmless error. 2015In applying this analysis, no single factor controls the outcome of the inquiry. 298 Kan. at 599 . | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences2022Although inmates' rights are limited in prison disciplinary proceedings, they are entitled to the opportunity to call witnesses and present documentary evidence when doing so is not "unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional goals." Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 566 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. 2022Although inmates' rights are limited in prison disciplinary proceedings, they are entitled to the opportunity to call witnesses and present documentary evidence when doing so is not "unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional goals." Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 566 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Funk
green
2 sentences2021State v. Funk, 301 Kan. 925, 935 , 349 P.3d 1230 (2015). 2021State v. Funk, 301 Kan. 925, 935 , 349 P.3d 1230 (2015). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Edgar v. State
green
1 sentence2020Prejudice is demonstrated by a showing that there was a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's error, the outcome of the hearing would have been different. 294 Kan. at 829 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Ellen Jones, Leo P. Portnoy, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant v. Nuclear Pharmacy, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation, and Robert Lee Sanchez
green
1 sentence2013The third enumerated consideration is “whether the value of an immediate recovery outweighs the mere possibility of future relief after protracted and expensive litigation.” Jones, 741 F.2d at 324 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Fuentes v. Shevin
green
1 sentence1989It is enough to invoke the procedural safeguards of the Fourteenth Amendment that a significant property interest is at stake, whatever the ultimate outcome of a hearing on the contractual right to continued possession and use of the goods.” 407 U.S. at 87 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.