Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1907–2025 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ginthergreen2 sentences2022In addition, the trial court did mention that Detective Heaney’s testimony 3 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 442-444 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -4- regarding defendant’s CPL established that “[d]efendant at least had access to a weapon.” Based on this, there is no basis for concluding that there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome if defense counsel had objected to Detective Heaney’s testimony. 2022In addition, the trial court did mention that Detective Heaney’s testimony 3 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 442-444 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -4- regarding defendant’s CPL established that “[d]efendant at least had access to a weapon.” Based on this, there is no basis for concluding that there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome if defense counsel had objected to Detective Heaney’s testimony. | 2 | 3 |
People v. Blevinsgreen2 sentences2018See People v Blevins, 314 Mich App 339, 350 ; 886 NW2d 456 (2016), app held in abeyance 884 NW2d 579 (Mich, 2016), app held in abeyance 884 NW2d 580 (Mich, 2016) (“Defendant contends that the lineups were not ‘double blind,’ so the officers conducting the lineup might have subtly or unconsciously suggested a ‘correct’ choice to the witnesses, but this conclusion is pure speculation.”). 2018See People v Blevins, 314 Mich App 339, 350 ; 886 NW2d 456 (2016), app held in abeyance 884 NW2d 579 (Mich, 2016), app held in abeyance 884 NW2d 580 (Mich, 2016) (“Defendant contends that the lineups were not ‘double blind,’ so the officers conducting the lineup might have subtly or unconsciously suggested a ‘correct’ choice to the witnesses, but this conclusion is pure speculation.”). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Vaughngreen2 sentences2017See Vaughn, 491 Mich at 671 . 2 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -4- Ample evidence was provided at trial to prove that defendant was guilty of the charged crimes. 2017See Vaughn, 491 Mich at 671 . 2 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -4- Ample evidence was provided at trial to prove that defendant was guilty of the charged crimes. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Trakhtenberggreen2 sentences2022Trakhtenberg, 493 Mich at 51 . 2022See id. at 51 . | 1 | 2 |
People v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2021See Williams, 275 Mich App at 200 . | 1 | 1 |
Kotteakos v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1996See also Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (substantial influence on the outcome standard). 1996See also Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (substantial influence on the outcome standard). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2022Strickland, 466 US at 694 . 2022Under the Strickland standard, the defendants had to demonstrate “a reasonable probability of a different outcome had the error not been committed.” Id. at 18, citing Strickland, 466 US at 694 . | 4 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Carbin
green
2 sentences2018Carbin, 463 Mich at 600 Next, defendant argues that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of evidence concerning the fact that defendant was on parole and for asking questions -5- that pertained to defendant’s parole status. 2018Carbin, 463 Mich at 600 Next, defendant argues that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of evidence concerning the fact that defendant was on parole and for asking questions -5- that pertained to defendant’s parole status. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Campbell-Durocher Grp. Painting & Gen. Contracting, LLC
green
2 sentences2025Given that the trial court ultimately granted US Bank’s motion for summary disposition and dismissed the case, Oneal’s motion to amend did, indeed, become moot. -3- Contracting, LLC, 322 Mich App 218, 224 ; 911 NW2d 493 (2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2025Given that the trial court ultimately granted US Bank’s motion for summary disposition and dismissed the case, Oneal’s motion to amend did, indeed, become moot. -3- Contracting, LLC, 322 Mich App 218, 224 ; 911 NW2d 493 (2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Lme v. Ars
green
2 sentences2025“Ordinarily, it is not enough for an appellant in [her] brief simply to announce a position or assert an error and then it up to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for [her] claims, or unravel and elaborate [her] arguments, and then search for authority either to sustain or reject [her] position.” LME v ARS, 261 Mich App 273, 286-287 ; 680 NW2d 902 (2004) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2025“Ordinarily, it is not enough for an appellant in [her] brief simply to announce a position or assert an error and then it up to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for [her] claims, or unravel and elaborate [her] arguments, and then search for authority either to sustain or reject [her] position.” LME v ARS, 261 Mich App 273, 286-287 ; 680 NW2d 902 (2004) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People of Michigan v. Christopher Allan Oros
green
2 sentences2024See People v Thurmond, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2023) (Docket No. 361302); slip op at 2 (explaining that the “same standards [for reviewing a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge] apply to a motion for a directed verdict or a JNOV”). -2- all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.” People v Oros, 502 Mich 229, 239 ; 917 NW2d 559 (2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2024See People v Thurmond, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2023) (Docket No. 361302); slip op at 2 (explaining that the “same standards [for reviewing a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge] apply to a motion for a directed verdict or a JNOV”). -2- all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.” People v Oros, 502 Mich 229, 239 ; 917 NW2d 559 (2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Kelly
green
2 sentences2024An appellant “may not merely announce his position and leave it to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for his claims, nor may he give only cursory treatment with little or no citation of supporting authority.” People v Kelly, 231 Mich App 627, 640-641 ; 588 NW2d 480 (1998). 2024An appellant “may not merely announce his position and leave it to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for his claims, nor may he give only cursory treatment with little or no citation of supporting authority.” People v Kelly, 231 Mich App 627, 640-641 ; 588 NW2d 480 (1998). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Kanaan
green
2 sentences2024People v Kanaan, 278 Mich App 594, 619 ; 751 NW2d 57 (2008). “[A] reviewing court is required to draw 1 At trial, defendant moved for directed verdict on these grounds as well; to the extent he intends to challenge on appeal not just the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s verdict but also the trial court’s denial of that motion, the outcome of our analysis is the same. 2024People v Kanaan, 278 Mich App 594, 619 ; 751 NW2d 57 (2008). “[A] reviewing court is required to draw 1 At trial, defendant moved for directed verdict on these grounds as well; to the extent he intends to challenge on appeal not just the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s verdict but also the trial court’s denial of that motion, the outcome of our analysis is the same. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Babcock v. Public Bank
green
2 sentences1993Babcock v Public Bank, 366 Mich 124, 135 ; 114 NW2d 159 (1962). 1993Babcock v Public Bank, 366 Mich 124, 135 ; 114 NW2d 159 (1962). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Ignotov v. Reiter
green
2 sentences1992In Ignotov v Reiter, *114 425 Mich 391 ; 390 NW2d 614 (1986), an evenly divided Supreme Court did not agree on the outcome or on the analysis; the Court agreed, however, that the question whether the attorney’s breach of the duty of care caused the plaintiffs loss was a question of fact. 1992In Ignotov v Reiter, *114 425 Mich 391 ; 390 NW2d 614 (1986), an evenly divided Supreme Court did not agree on the outcome or on the analysis; the Court agreed, however, that the question whether the attorney’s breach of the duty of care caused the plaintiffs loss was a question of fact. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Rapaport v. Rapaport
green
2 sentences1990Id. 1990Id. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Smith v. Michigan Parole Board
neutral
2 sentences1986Thus, defendant's argument, urging the exclusivity of an administrative appeal, is even less compelling than in Triplett and Smith, supra . 1986Thus, defendant’s argument, urging the exclusivity of an administrative appeal, is even less compelling than in Triplett and Smith, supra. Nevertheless, defendant maintains that the Recorder’s Court judge exceeded his authority in the habeas corpus proceeding. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
New York Life Insurance v. Fletcher
green
1 sentence1907Co. v. Fletcher, 117 U. S. 519 , Mr. Justice Field said: ‘ ‘ A curious result is the outcome of the instruction. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.