dismissed claim (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

dismissed claim in Oregon

10 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Board of Forestrygreen
orctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 164 Or App 114, 128-33 , 991 P2d 563 (1999) (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before takings claim is ripe).

2006See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 164 Or App 114, 128-33 , 991 P2d 563 (1999) (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before takings claim is ripe).

11
Ferguson v. Skrupagreen
scotus · 1963 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973
2 sentences

1973See also, Ferguson v. Skrupa, 372 US 726 , 83 S Ct 1028 , 10 L Ed 2d 93 , 95 ALR2d 1347 (1963).

1973See also, Ferguson v. Skrupa, 372 US 726 , 83 S Ct 1028 , 10 L Ed 2d 93 , 95 ALR2d 1347 (1963).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4J green
or · 1990
2 sentences

2026The provision of the file did not, however, moot OPB’s claim for declaratory relief, in view of ODOC’s—and the Attorney General’s—ongoing policy and practice of interpreting the ORS 192.345(3) exemption to apply to records that were not compiled for criminal law enforcement purposes when such records are provided in response to a subsequent investiga- tory demand by law enforcement or prosecutors.1 See Guard Publishing Co., 310 Or at 35 n 3 (explaining that where, as here, requested public records have been withheld pursu- ant to a claimed exemption, the subsequent provision of the requested r

2026The provision of the file did not, however, moot OPB’s claim for declaratory relief, in view of ODOC’s—and the Attorney General’s—ongoing policy and practice of interpreting the ORS 192.345(3) exemption to apply to records that were not compiled for criminal law enforcement purposes when such records are provided in response to a subsequent investigatory demand by law enforcement or prosecutors.1 See Guard Publishing Co., 310 Or at 35 n 3 (explaining that where, as here, requested public records have been withheld pursuant to a claimed exemption, the subsequent provision of the requested recor

22026–2026
Smith v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon green
or · 2017
1 sentence

2022Id. at 458 .

12022–2022
Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement Board green
or · 2005
2 sentences

2007Following that, in Strunk v. PERB, 338 Or 145, 153 , 108 P3d 1058 (2005), the court dismissed a claim of a party because he lacked standing.

2007Following that, in Strunk v. PERB, 338 Or 145, 153 , 108 P3d 1058 (2005), the court dismissed a claim of a party because he lacked standing.

12007–2007
Troutman v. Erlandson green
or · 1979
2 sentences

2003On appeal, we affirmed the dismissal of the IIED claim against the defendant lawyer on the ground that her actions were shielded by the absolute privilege: “In Troutman v. Erlandson, 286 Or 3, 6 , 593 P2d 793 (1979), the Supreme Court stated that it had ‘recognized the absolute privilege accorded communications made by attorneys in judicial proceedings.’ * * * Although the absolute attorney privilege question most frequently arises in defamation actions, this court has held that it applies to the ‘publication of any matter that is an invasion of privacy.’ Lee[ ], 65 Or App at 542 .

2003On appeal, we affirmed the dismissal of the IIED claim against the defendant lawyer on the ground that her actions were shielded by the absolute privilege: “In Troutman v. Erlandson, 286 Or 3, 6 , 593 P2d 793 (1979), the Supreme Court stated that it had ‘recognized the absolute privilege accorded communications made by attorneys in judicial proceedings.’ * * * Although the absolute attorney privilege question most frequently arises in defamation actions, this court has held that it applies to the ‘publication of any matter that is an invasion of privacy.’ Lee[ ], 65 Or App at 542 .

12003–2003
Lee v. Nash green
orctapp · 1983
1 sentence

2003On appeal, we affirmed the dismissal of the IIED claim against the defendant lawyer on the ground that her actions were shielded by the absolute privilege: “In Troutman v. Erlandson, 286 Or 3, 6 , 593 P2d 793 (1979), the Supreme Court stated that it had ‘recognized the absolute privilege accorded communications made by attorneys in judicial proceedings.’ * * * Although the absolute attorney privilege question most frequently arises in defamation actions, this court has held that it applies to the ‘publication of any matter that is an invasion of privacy.’ Lee[ ], 65 Or App at 542 .

12003–2003
McGanty v. Staudenraus green
orctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995The Court of Appeals held that the facts alleged in plaintiffs complaint stated a claim and permitted an inference of such intent. 123 Or App at 397 n 3.

11995–1995
Franklin v. Portland Community College green
orctapp · 1990
2 sentences

1993However, the complaint “need not contain the ‘magic words’ of ‘specific intent’ if the pleaded facts fairly permit an inference of specific intent.” Franklin v. PCC, 100 Or App 465, 470 , 787 P2d 489 (1990).

1993However, the complaint “need not contain the ‘magic words’ of ‘specific intent’ if the pleaded facts fairly permit an inference of specific intent.” Franklin v. PCC, 100 Or App 465, 470 , 787 P2d 489 (1990).

11993–1993
Sager v. McClenden green
or · 1983
2 sentences

1990Sager v. McClenden, 296 Or 33, 35 , 672 P2d 697 (1983).

1990Sager v. McClenden, 296 Or 33, 35 , 672 P2d 697 (1983).

11990–1990
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad green
scotus · 1969
1 sentence

1973Co., supra, 393 US at 143 , the court dismissed the challenge without discussion.

11973–1973

Where else courts name it

NY 49 (1910–2025) IL 44 (1980–2026) OH 34 (1989–2025) TX 28 (1961–2024) PA 27 (1943–2025) WA 27 (1988–2024) CA 20 (1957–2025) FL 19 (1973–2024) MI 18 (1980–2024) LA 15 (1950–2025) NJ 12 (1966–2024) AZ 12 (1971–2023) CO 11 (1962–2026) MD 10 (1961–2020) TN 10 (1978–2022) OR 10 (1973–2026) WI 10 (1977–2025) VT 9 (1988–2023) OK 8 (1931–2023) MO 8 (1988–2017) UT 8 (1987–2025) AL 7 (1976–2026) DC 6 (1974–2021) MS 6 (1996–2019) IN 5 (1987–2015) NC 5 (2001–2017) GA 4 (1970–2017) VA 4 (1981–2016) SD 4 (2007–2018) NH 4 (1995–2017) KY 4 (1986–2020) ID 4 (1983–2018) NM 4 (1970–2011) DE 4 (2017–2026) SC 4 (1983–2025) AR 3 (1986–2023) KS 3 (1989–2023) WV 3 (1999–2005) IA 3 (1961–2017) NE 2 (1990–2005) ND 2 (2003–2005) RI 2 (1991–2004) WY 2 (1985–2018) CT 2 (1998–2014) MN 2 (1987–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check