Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
IBC DENVER II, LLC. v. City of Wheat Ridgegreen1 sentence2026II, LLC v. City of Wheat Ridge, 183 P.3d 714, 717-18 (Colo. App. 2008) (appellant’s failure to challenge all reasons for the court’s decision requires affirmance). | 1 | 1 |
In re Donald C. Taylor and Margaret Ann Taylor Trustgreen1 sentence2021See C.R.C.P. 8(a)(2) (“A pl eading which sets forth a claim for a relief . . . shall contain . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”); see also Tay lor v. Taylor , 2016 COA 100, ¶ 31 (“A n appellate court may . . . affir m on any ground supported by the r ecord.”). | 1 | 1 |
Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary Districtgreen1 sentence2020While one might argue that in such a case the litigation has technically ended and the trial court has nothing further to do but execute the judgment, in actuality “the litigation has not been terminated on the merits” because the dismissal without prejudice “is not an adverse final ruling” and “leaves the dismissed claim for another day.” Barry, 168 F.3d at 14 ; see also Cook, 974 F.2d at 148 (noting that the plaintiff “remains free to file another complaint raising those same claims”); Arrow Gear, 629 F.3d at 637 (expressing similar concerns). 14 ¶ 22 Third, the courts have raised concerns a | 1 | 1 |
Delores J. Cook v. Rocky Mountain Bank Note Company, a Colorado Corporation, and Romo Corp., a Colorado Corporationgreen1 sentence2020While one might argue that in such a case the litigation has technically ended and the trial court has nothing further to do but execute the judgment, in actuality “the litigation has not been terminated on the merits” because the dismissal without prejudice “is not an adverse final ruling” and “leaves the dismissed claim for another day.” Barry, 168 F.3d at 14 ; see also Cook, 974 F.2d at 148 (noting that the plaintiff “remains free to file another complaint raising those same claims”); Arrow Gear, 629 F.3d at 637 (expressing similar concerns). 14 ¶ 22 Third, the courts have raised concerns a | 1 | 1 |
Disciplinary Counsel v. Staffordgreen1 sentence2011See Disciplinary Counsel v. Stafford, 128 Ohio St.3d 446 , 946 N.E.2d 193 , 198 (2011) (quotations and citations omitted); see also Colo. RPC 3.2 cmt. 1 ("Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party's attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. | 1 | 1 |
Snow Basin, Ltd. v. Boettcher & Co.green1 sentence1992Compare Mead Associates, Inc. v. Antonsen, 677 P.2d 434 (Colo.App.1984) with Snow Basin, Ltd. v. Boettcher & Co., 805 P.2d 1151 (Colo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Mead Associates, Inc. v. Antonsengreen1 sentence1992Compare Mead Associates, Inc. v. Antonsen, 677 P.2d 434 (Colo.App.1984) with Snow Basin, Ltd. v. Boettcher & Co., 805 P.2d 1151 (Colo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmondgreen2 sentences1988See, e.g., Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Miami Int'l Realty Co. v. Town of Mt. 1988See, e.g., Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Miami Int'l Realty Co. v. Town of Mt. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nunn v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2021Id. 2021Id. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State Treasurer of the State of Michigan, Public School Employees' Retirement System, Custodian of v. Harold v. Barry, Barry n.p.-500, L.P.
green
1 sentence2020While one might argue that in such a case the litigation has technically ended and the trial court has nothing further to do but execute the judgment, in actuality “the litigation has not been terminated on the merits” because the dismissal without prejudice “is not an adverse final ruling” and “leaves the dismissed claim for another day.” Barry, 168 F.3d at 14 ; see also Cook, 974 F.2d at 148 (noting that the plaintiff “remains free to file another complaint raising those same claims”); Arrow Gear, 629 F.3d at 637 (expressing similar concerns). 14 ¶ 22 Third, the courts have raised concerns a | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bleck v. City of Alamosa
green
1 sentence2016Id. at 1155 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Leake v. Cain
yellow
1 sentence1989The trial court dismissed their claim, however, concluding that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Leake v. Cain, 720 P.2d 152 (Colo.1986), required it to determine whether any duty was owed by the City or Potter by the application of “traditional tort principles.” Application of these principles to the undisputed facts presented to it caused that court to conclude that no duty was owed to defendants by either of the third-party defendants. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
International Trust Co. v. Liebhardt
green
2 sentences1962Ordinarily the obligation of a husband for the support and maintenance of a wife from whom he has separated ends with his death; but the rule is recognized in Colorado that a husband may by contract agree that such payments shall continue after his death and be payable from his estate, International Trust Co. v. Liebhardt, 111 Colo. 208 , 139 P.2d 264 , 147 A.L.R. 700 . 1962Ordinarily the obligation of a husband for the support and maintenance of a wife from whom he has separated ends with his death; but the rule is recognized in Colorado that a husband may by contract agree that such payments shall continue after his death and be payable from his estate, International Trust Co. v. Liebhardt, 111 Colo. 208 , 139 P.2d 264 , 147 A.L.R. 700 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.