9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McMahan v. Berrygreen2 sentences2002This case resembles McMahan v. Berry, 319 Ark. 88, 93-94 , 890 S.W.2d 242, 246 (1994), in which the appellant objected to certain jury instructions, and without specifically ruling on the appellant’s objection, the court gave the instructions to the jury. 2002This case resembles McMahan v. Berry, 319 Ark. 88, 93-94 , 890 S.W.2d 242, 246 (1994), in which the appellant objected to certain jury instructions, and without specifically ruling on the appellant’s objection, the court gave the instructions to the jury. | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Turner v. State, 325 Ark. 237 , 926 S.W.2d 843 (1996). 2001See Turner v. State, 325 Ark. 237 , 926 S.W.2d 843 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grady v. Corbin
red
2 sentences1993This holding would not bar a subsequent prosecution on the homicide or assault charges if the bill of particulars revealed that the State would not rely on proving the conduct for which Corbin had already been convicted (i.e. if the State relied solely on Corbin’s driving too fast in heavy rain to establish recklessness or negligence). 495 U.S. at 523 . 1991Id. at 2094 . | 2 | 1991–1993 |
Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001In Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728 , 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977), we stated the following rule on collateral estoppel when identical cases have been filed in federal district court and state court: Federal district courts and state courts are separate jurisdictions. 2001In Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728 , 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977), we stated the following rule on collateral estoppel when identical cases have been filed in federal district court and state court: Federal district courts and state courts are separate jurisdictions. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1993Appellant also notes the supreme court’s approval of a statement found in Brown v. State, 442 N.E.2d 1109 (Ind. 1982), that “the issue of pretext arrest only arises when the surrounding circumstances show that the arrest is only a sham being used as an excuse for making a search for evidence of a different and more serious offense for which no probable cause exists.” While it is true that the issue of pretextual arrest was the subject of extended discussion in Richardson, it would seem that the real basis for the court’s holding was a violation of the detention limits imposed by Rule 3.1 of th | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Hines v. State
green
2 sentences1993The court in Richardson said, “Regardless of whether we can technically justify the arrest on the charge of public intoxication, we can find no justification whatever for these rules violations.” Shortly after the decision in Richardson, the supreme court decided Hines v. State, 289 Ark. 50 , 709 S.W.2d 65 (1986). 1993The court in Richardson said, “Regardless of whether we can technically justify the arrest on the charge of public intoxication, we can find no justification whatever for these rules violations.” Shortly after the decision in Richardson, the supreme court decided Hines v. State, 289 Ark. 50 , 709 S.W.2d 65 (1986). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Mitchell v. State
green
2 sentences1989Mitchell v. State, 295 Ark. 341 , 750 S.W.2d 936 (1988). 1989Mitchell v. State, 295 Ark. 341 , 750 S.W.2d 936 (1988). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Turner v. United States
green
2 sentences1973In Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S. Ct. 642 , 24 L. 1973In Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S. Ct. 642 , 24 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Helena v. Mattice
green
2 sentences1969Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Newport v. Whidden, supra; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Southeast Arkansas v. Jones, 226 Ark. 953 , 295 S.W. 2d 321 ; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Helena, v. Mattice, 219 Ark. 428 , 243 S.W. 2d 15 . 1969Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Newport v. Whidden, supra; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Southeast Arkansas v. Jones, 226 Ark. 953 , 295 S.W. 2d 321 ; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Helena, v. Mattice, 219 Ark. 428 , 243 S.W. 2d 15 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Southeast Arkansas v. Jones
neutral
2 sentences1969Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Newport v. Whidden, supra; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Southeast Arkansas v. Jones, 226 Ark. 953 , 295 S.W. 2d 321 ; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Helena, v. Mattice, 219 Ark. 428 , 243 S.W. 2d 15 . 1969Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Newport v. Whidden, supra; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Southeast Arkansas v. Jones, 226 Ark. 953 , 295 S.W. 2d 321 ; Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Helena, v. Mattice, 219 Ark. 428 , 243 S.W. 2d 15 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.