holding analysis (District of Columbia) · Go Syfert
← District of Columbia issues

holding analysis in District of Columbia

6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Lynn v. Lynngreen
dc · 1992 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Consequently, this holding of waiver by Armstrong I became the law of the case, see, e.g., Lynn v. Lynn, 617 A.2d 963, 969 (D.C.1992) (law of the case “precludes reopening questions resolved by an earlier appeal in the same case”), and Judge Nash correctly refused to consider the § 772 argument on remand.

11
Millard v. United Statesgreen
dc · 2009 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009The contrary conclusion reached by a division of this court in an analogous setting, see Millard v. United States, 967 A.2d 155, 163 (D.C.2009) (CNRs attesting to no record of license to carry a pistol or registration of firearm not “testimonial”), cannot survive the holding and analysis of Melendez-Diaz.

11
Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.green
cadc · 1990 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993Williams v. Baker, supra, 572 A.2d at 1064, 1066-67 ; see also Jones v. Howard University, Inc., 589 A.2d 419, 421 (D.C.1991); Williams v. U.S. Elevator Corp., 287 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 228 , 920 F.2d 1019, 1022 (1990) (applying D.C. law).

1993Williams v. Baker, supra, 572 A.2d at 1064, 1066-67 ; see also Jones v. Howard University, Inc., 589 A.2d 419, 421 (D.C.1991); Williams v. U.S. Elevator Corp., 287 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 228 , 920 F.2d 1019, 1022 (1990) (applying D.C. law).

11
Jones v. Howard University, Inc.green
dc · 1991 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993Williams v. Baker, supra, 572 A.2d at 1064, 1066-67 ; see also Jones v. Howard University, Inc., 589 A.2d 419, 421 (D.C.1991); Williams v. U.S. Elevator Corp., 287 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 228 , 920 F.2d 1019, 1022 (1990) (applying D.C. law).

11
Williams v. Bakergreen
dc · 1990 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993On appeal the Sowells contend that the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment to appellee in light of the holding and analysis by the en banc court in Williams v. Baker, supra, 572 A.2d 1062 . 4 Mrs. Sowell admitted that she did not eat the worm she saw, and therefore, appellee maintains, she could not show the required physical impact.

1993On appeal the Sowells contend that the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment to appellee in light of the holding and analysis by the en banc court in Williams v. Baker, supra, 572 A.2d 1062 . 4 Mrs. Sowell admitted that she did not eat the worm she saw, and therefore, appellee maintains, she could not show the required physical impact.

11
Dyson v. United Statesgreen
dc · 1982 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985See, e.g., ( Duane) Dyson v. United States, 450 A.2d 432, 440-41 (D.C.1982). [6] The opinion of Judge Gallagher, in which he concurs in the result but disagrees with the holding that error was committed on defendant's cross-examination, questions whether the en banc court does indeed approve most of Baptist's analysis, as we state above at p. 459 (Gallagher, J., concurring in result at p. 474).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Baptist v. United States green
dc · 1983
2 sentences

1985The Baptist analysis is set forth at 466 A.2d at 458 .

1985The Baptist analysis is set forth at 466 A.2d at 458 .

11985–1985
cluster 275114 green
cadc · 1967
1 sentence

1977“No principle of administrative law is more firmly established than that of agency control of its own calendar.” City of San Antonio v. CAB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 112 , 115, 374 F.2d 326 , 329 (1967).

11977–1977
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1975We rely for such a holding on the factors discussed above and on the lines of precedent leading to and stemming from Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 , 93 S.Ct. 2553 , 37 L.Ed.2d 669 (1973).

1975We rely for such a holding on the factors discussed above and on the lines of precedent leading to and stemming from Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 , 93 S.Ct. 2553 , 37 L.Ed.2d 669 (1973).

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

TX 73 (1895–2023) NY 71 (1889–2024) CA 62 (1893–2026) PA 44 (1906–2024) WV 42 (1895–2026) IL 39 (1920–2023) FL 34 (1928–2016) OH 33 (1937–2024) MD 30 (1928–2024) WA 25 (1927–2025) MI 25 (1961–2025) AL 22 (1849–2025) MO 20 (1883–2019) GA 20 (1953–2020) LA 18 (1961–2024) IN 18 (1923–2019) TN 17 (1956–2023) OR 15 (1903–2022) MS 15 (1987–2020) WI 14 (1938–2016) VA 14 (1874–2022) CO 13 (1888–2025) NJ 13 (1944–2015) KY 12 (1917–2017) MA 11 (1939–2020) CT 11 (1942–2021) MN 10 (1885–2001) OK 9 (1911–2023) AR 9 (1969–2002) KS 8 (1913–2024) RI 8 (1967–2016) ID 8 (1980–2025) IA 7 (1939–2010) AZ 7 (1956–2000) NC 7 (1916–2010) DE 7 (1923–2022) HI 7 (1904–2015) NE 6 (1908–1998) DC 6 (1975–2016) SC 5 (1912–1989) MT 5 (1923–2007) UT 5 (1981–2017) AK 4 (1986–1994) WY 3 (1933–2018) VT 3 (2014–2025) PR 3 (1951–1967) NV 3 (1980–2012) SD 2 (1949–2003) ND 2 (1910–2002) NH 2 (2003–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check