adversary hearing in Kentucky

9 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1917–2021 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Jones v. Commonwealthgreen ky · 2011 · cited in 3 Kentucky opinions naming this issue, 2018–2021 2 sentences 2021In Jones, the Kentucky Supreme Court explained that “implicit in our statutory scheme requiring restitution, is an adversary hearing, ordinarily conducted in conjunction with the final sentencing hearing, at which the trial court will have broad discretion to make findings based upon reliable information, but not bound by the rules of evidence or traditional rules of pleading.” Id. 2021As stated in Jones, “implicit in our statutory scheme requiring restitution, is an adversary hearing, ordinarily conducted in conjunction with the final sentencing hearing, at which the trial court will have broad discretion to make findings based upon reliable information, but not bound by the rules of evidence or traditional rules of pleading.” Jones, 382 S.W.3d at 31 .	1	3

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (21)

Case	Cited	Years
Webster Groves Trust Company v. Saxon green ca8 · 1966 1 sentence 1978This reasoning is succinctly stated in Webster Groves Trust Company v. Saxon, supra, as follows: ‘The very nature of the decision required by the Comptroller indicates that a formal adversary type hearing would be of little benefit to him in the discharge of his discretionary powers.	1	1978–1978
Gable v. Jenkins green gand · 1970 1 sentence 1971Gable v. Jenkins, 397 U.S. 592 , 25 L.Ed.2d 595 , 90 S.Ct. 1351 , decided April 20, 1970; for opinion affirmed see 309 F.Supp. 998 (1969).	1	1971–1971
A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas green scotus · 1964 2 sentences 1971In support of that view the appellant relies on such decisions as Marcus v. Search Warrants of Property at 104 East Tenth St., Kansas City, Mo., 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 , and A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205, 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 . 1971In support of that view the appellant relies on such decisions as Marcus v. Search Warrants of Property at 104 East Tenth St., Kansas City, Mo., 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 , and A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205, 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 .	1	1971–1971
Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property green scotus · 1961 2 sentences 1971In support of that view the appellant relies on such decisions as Marcus v. Search Warrants of Property at 104 East Tenth St., Kansas City, Mo., 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 , and A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205, 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 . 1971In support of that view the appellant relies on such decisions as Marcus v. Search Warrants of Property at 104 East Tenth St., Kansas City, Mo., 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 , and A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205, 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 .	1	1971–1971
Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell green kyed · 1968 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Smith v. Commonwealth green kyctapphigh · 1971 1 sentence 1971This court dealt with a related question in Smith v. Commonwealth, Ky., 465 S.W.2d 918 , and held that a prior adversary hearing respecting obscenity was not required where the allegedly obscene material was purchased in the usual course of business.	1	1971–1971
Gable v. Jenkins green scotus · 1970 1 sentence 1971Gable v. Jenkins, 397 U.S. 592 , 25 L.Ed.2d 595 , 90 S.Ct. 1351 , decided April 20, 1970; for opinion affirmed see 309 F.Supp. 998 (1969).	1	1971–1971
Perez v. Ledesma green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1971In Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 , 91 S.Ct. 674 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (decided February 23, 1971), the Supreme Court reversed a decision of a three-judge federal court which had held illegal the seizure of material as obscene incident to an arrest, without a prior adversary hearing as to its obscenity. 1971In Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 , 91 S.Ct. 674 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (decided February 23, 1971), the Supreme Court reversed a decision of a three-judge federal court which had held illegal the seizure of material as obscene incident to an arrest, without a prior adversary hearing as to its obscenity.	1	1971–1971
Metzger v. Pearcy green ca7 · 1968 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
cluster 284713 green ca4 · 1969 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan green ca3 · 1969 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Astro Cinema Corp. Inc., John Justin and Jess Rockman v. Thomas J. MacKell District Attorney of Queens County green ca2 · 1970 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
cluster 290216 green ca9 · 1970 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
United States v. Ferris J. Alexander and Edward J. Alexander green ca8 · 1970 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Goodwin v. Morris neutral ohnd · 1970 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Covello v. United States green scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Wilkinson v. Tyrone, Inc. green scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1971Some of the decisions dealing with the question are Astro Cinema Corporation, Inc. v. Mackell, 422 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970); Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3rd Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7th Cir.1968); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 , cert. den., 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 477 , 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449 ; United States v. Alexander, 428 F.2d 1169 (8th Cir. 1970); Goodwin v. Morris, 318 F.Supp. 1325 (ND Ohio WD 1970); and Cambist Films, Inc. v. Tribell, 293 F.Supp. 407 (ED Ky.1968).	1	1971–1971
Snyder v. Ware green scotus · 1970 1 sentence 1971Gable v. Jenkins, 397 U.S. 592 , 25 L.Ed.2d 595 , 90 S.Ct. 1351 , decided April 20, 1970; for opinion affirmed see 309 F.Supp. 998 (1969).	1	1971–1971
Abate v. Mundt green scotus · 1970 1 sentence 1971Gable v. Jenkins, 397 U.S. 592 , 25 L.Ed.2d 595 , 90 S.Ct. 1351 , decided April 20, 1970; for opinion affirmed see 309 F.Supp. 998 (1969).	1	1971–1971
Chambers v. Pleak neutral kyctapp · 1838 2 sentences 1943And 64 any person entering under them, or either of them, or deriving title from them, will stand in no better condition than they. ’ ’ Chambers v. Pleak, 36 Ky. 426 , 6 Dana 426 , 32 Am. 1943And 64 any person entering under them, or either of them, or deriving title from them, will stand in no better condition than they. ’ ’ Chambers v. Pleak, 36 Ky. 426 , 6 Dana 426 , 32 Am.	1	1943–1943
Fields v. Farmers & Drovers Bank neutral kyctapp · 1901 1 sentence 1917This principle grows out of the privity between them, and inculcates fidelity and good faith.” In the more recent case .of Fields v. Farmers’ & Drovers’ Bank, 110 Ky. 256 , this court applies the same principle and quotes from a number of cases recognizing the doctrine that one co-tenant buying in an outstanding title or claim does so for the use and benefit of his co-tenants.	1	1917–1917

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KY § Ky. Rev. Stat. § 436.101 (3) KY § Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.032 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 94 (1970–2025) CA 74 (1942–2025) NY 68 (1955–2013) FL 35 (1965–2016) OH 27 (1969–2026) OK 26 (1973–2015) LA 25 (1971–2021) MA 21 (1973–2024) MD 21 (1972–2026) PA 21 (1970–2020) MO 20 (1970–2022) NJ 16 (1960–2020) AZ 15 (1971–2018) WA 14 (1971–2024) IL 14 (1973–2020) WI 13 (1926–2023) MN 12 (1964–2016) HI 12 (1962–2018) NC 11 (1978–2022) DC 11 (1971–2016) MI 11 (1969–2018) IN 9 (1972–1996) KY 9 (1917–2021) AL 9 (1848–2024) CO 8 (1971–2019) OR 8 (1963–2016) MT 7 (1922–1984) MS 7 (1979–2019) GA 7 (1970–1994) IA 7 (1973–1991) NV 6 (1971–2020) RI 6 (1965–2007) CT 6 (1979–2000) WV 5 (1974–2004) NM 5 (2014–2022) TN 4 (2000–2018) DE 4 (1971–2023) AR 4 (1972–2010) WY 3 (1983–1995) KS 3 (1975–2004) NH 3 (1986–2013) ID 3 (1983–1994) NE 3 (1973–2024) AK 3 (1981–2013) VA 3 (1920–1976) ME 2 (1978–1993) SD 2 (1973–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check