Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Rollins Environ. Services, Inc.green2 sentences2021Thus, “mere exposure to evidence presented in nonadversary investigative procedures is insufficient in itself to impugn the fairness of the board members at a later adversary hearing.” Id., 481 So.2d at 120-21 (internal citations omitted). 2021Thus, “mere exposure to evidence presented in nonadversary investigative procedures is insufficient in itself to impugn the fairness of the board members at a later adversary hearing.” Id., 481 So.2d at 120-21 (internal citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Freedman v. Marylandgreen2 sentences1984Carlin relies on Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965), in which the Supreme Court invalidated a Maryland statute requiring submission of all motion pictures to the State Board of Censors before the films were exhibited. 1984Carlin relies on Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965), in which the Supreme Court invalidated a Maryland statute requiring submission of all motion pictures to the State Board of Censors before the films were exhibited. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Gambinogreen2 sentences1980The intervention is not improper. [2] Expressions to the contrary in State v. Gambino, 362 So.2d 1107, 1111 (La.1978) are not correct, and to the extent it is in conflict with our opinion, the case is overruled. [1] (1) Except for those motion pictures, printed materials, and photographic materials showing actual ultimate sexual acts or simulated or animated ultimate sexual acts when there is an explicit, close-up depiction of human genital organs so as to give the appearance of the consummation of ultimate sexual acts, no person, firm, or corporation shall be arrested, charged, or indicted fo 1979Applying the rule in State v. Gambino, supra , we hold that the trial court correctly ruled that a prior adversary hearing was unnecessary. | 1 | 2 |
Banks v. Administrator of Dept. of Employment SEC.green1 sentence1987See, for example, Banks v. Administrator of Dept. of Employment, 384 So.2d 485, 487-488 (La.App. 2d Cir.1980) [1] ; Anderson v. Blache, 490 So.2d 1149 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Walden Book Co.green1 sentence1986See, for example, State v. Walden Book Co., 386 So.2d 342 (La.1980). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martingreen1 sentence1985See State v. Martin, 376 So.2d 300 (La., 1979). [6] The commentary to the A.B.A. standards relating to discovery and procedure before trial, § 2.1(a)(iv) (approved draft of the Federal Rules, 1970, pp. 66-67) justified disclosure under Rule 16(a)(1)(D) because it is "... practically impossible for the adversary to test or rebut at trial without an advance opportunity to examine it closely ... [A]nd it is virtually impossible for evidence or information of this kind to be distorted or misused because of its advance disclosure." Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16(a)(1)(D) provides: "(D | 1 | 1 |
Delta Book Distributors, Inc. v. Cronvichgreen1 sentence1983See Delta Book v. Cronvich, 304 F.Supp. 662 (E.D.La.1969), Rubin, J. dissenting; Milky Way Prod., Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd per curiam sub nom., New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970); United States v. Young, 465 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.1972). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Overstreetgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicagogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cormier v. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST OF GIULIO
green
2 sentences2019Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La. 1989). 2019Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La. 1989). | 3 | 1991–2019 |
Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia
green
2 sentences1973In Marcus, Bantam Books, Freedman, A Quantity of Books, and Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968), the overriding holding is that there can not be, under a licensing statute, a statute for injunction or destruction, or a criminal prosecution, prior restraint without notice and hearing by seizure under search warrant or suppression by other method, unless immediate judicial determination in an adversary hearing is available, and a speedy final judicial determination of the issue is provided. 1973In Marcus, Bantam Books, Freedman, A Quantity of Books, and Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968), the overriding holding is that there can not be, under a licensing statute, a statute for injunction or destruction, or a criminal prosecution, prior restraint without notice and hearing by seizure under search warrant or suppression by other method, unless immediate judicial determination in an adversary hearing is available, and a speedy final judicial determination of the issue is provided. | 3 | 1972–1973 |
State v. Eros Cinema, Inc.
green
2 sentences1983See Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965); Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 , 93 S.Ct. 2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973); State v. Eros Cinema, 262 La. 706 , 264 So.2d 615 (1972); Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 , 100 S.Ct. 1156 , 63 L.Ed.2d 413 (1980); Parish of Jefferson v. Bayou Landing, 350 So.2d 158 (La.1977). 1983See Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965); Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 , 93 S.Ct. 2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973); State v. Eros Cinema, 262 La. 706 , 264 So.2d 615 (1972); Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 , 100 S.Ct. 1156 , 63 L.Ed.2d 413 (1980); Parish of Jefferson v. Bayou Landing, 350 So.2d 158 (La.1977). | 2 | 1977–1983 |
Heller v. New York
green
2 sentences1977However, in Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 , 93 S.Ct. 2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973), the Supreme Court held that an adversary hearing prior to a seizure by lawful warrant was not required. 1977However, in Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 , 93 S.Ct. 2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973), the Supreme Court held that an adversary hearing prior to a seizure by lawful warrant was not required. | 2 | 1977–1983 |
Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown
green
2 sentences1977See Times Film Corp. v. Chicago, 365 U.S. 43 , 81 S.Ct. 391 , 5 L.Ed.2d 403 (1961); Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 440-442 , 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1327-1328 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). . ." ". . . 1977See Times Film Corp. v. Chicago, 365 U.S. 43 , 81 S.Ct. 391 , 5 L.Ed.2d 403 (1961); Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 440-442 , 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1327-1328 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). . ." ". . . | 2 | 1973–1977 |
Burke v. Kingsley Books, Inc.
green
2 sentences1973Burke v. Kingsley Books, 208 Misc. 150 , 142 N.Y.S.2d 735 (1955). 1973Burke v. Kingsley Books, 208 Misc. 150 , 142 N.Y.S.2d 735 (1955). | 2 | 1972–1973 |
Gerstein v. Pugh
green
1 sentence2011Id., 420 U.S. at 111 , 95 S.Ct. at 861. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Polk v. STATE EX REL. DOTD
green
1 sentence2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Revere v. Layrisson
green
1 sentence1994Revere v. Layrisson, 593 So.2d 397 (La.App. 1 Cir.1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In Re Murchison.
green
2 sentences1992The Court went on to state that "[n]ot only is a biased decisionmaker constitutionally unacceptable but `our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness.'" Withrow v. Larkin, 95 S.Ct. at 1464 , quoting In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623, 625 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1927). 1992The Court went on to state that "[n]ot only is a biased decisionmaker constitutionally unacceptable but `our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness.'" Withrow v. Larkin, 95 S.Ct. at 1464 , quoting In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623, 625 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1927). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Withrow v. Larkin
green
1 sentence1992The Court went on to state that "[n]ot only is a biased decisionmaker constitutionally unacceptable but `our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness.'" Withrow v. Larkin, 95 S.Ct. at 1464 , quoting In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623, 625 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1927). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Bizal v. Connick
neutral
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Campbell
neutral
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bizal v. Connick
green
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Campbell
neutral
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Harrison v. Norris
green
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Harrison v. Norris
green
1 sentence1991Cormier v. Public Records Request of Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989); Harrison v. Norris, 569 So.2d 585 (La.App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied, 571 So.2d 657 (La.1990); State v. Campbell, 566 So.2d 1038 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 111 (La.1990); Bizal v. Connick, 489 So.2d 343 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 491 So.2d 10 (La. 1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Anderson v. Blache
green
1 sentence1987See, for example, Banks v. Administrator of Dept. of Employment, 384 So.2d 485, 487-488 (La.App. 2d Cir.1980) [1] ; Anderson v. Blache, 490 So.2d 1149 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Lingle
green
1 sentence1985That commentary justified disclosure because it is "... particularly impossible for the adversary to test or rebut at trial without an advance opportunity to examine it closely ... [A]nd it is virtually impossible for evidence of this kind to be distorted or misused because of its advance disclosure." Lingle, supra at footnote 6. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Walters
green
1 sentence1985State v. Walters, 440 So.2d 115 (La.1983). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
United States v. Freeman B. Young
green
1 sentence1983See Delta Book v. Cronvich, 304 F.Supp. 662 (E.D.La.1969), Rubin, J. dissenting; Milky Way Prod., Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd per curiam sub nom., New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970); United States v. Young, 465 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.1972). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Parish of Jefferson v. Bayou Landing Ltd., Inc.
green
1 sentence1983See Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965); Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 , 93 S.Ct. 2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973); State v. Eros Cinema, 262 La. 706 , 264 So.2d 615 (1972); Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 , 100 S.Ct. 1156 , 63 L.Ed.2d 413 (1980); Parish of Jefferson v. Bayou Landing, 350 So.2d 158 (La.1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary
green
1 sentence1983See Delta Book v. Cronvich, 304 F.Supp. 662 (E.D.La.1969), Rubin, J. dissenting; Milky Way Prod., Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd per curiam sub nom., New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970); United States v. Young, 465 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.1972). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| New York Feed Co. v. Leary green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| New York Feed Co. v. Leary green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Vance v. Universal Amusement Co. green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| United States v. James L. Crowder green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Adams v. State green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Creamer v. State green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Indiana v. Adams green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Crowder v. United States green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Bowden v. State green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Wright v. North Carolina Et Al. green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| State v. Skinner green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Gulf States Theatres of La., Inc. v. Richardson green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess Anne green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Roth v. United States green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| State v. Bazzell green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Webster Groves Trust Company v. Saxon green | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| Cement National Bank v. Department of Banking neutral | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.