adversary hearing in Indiana

1992Explaining the reasoning of Ruddock v. Ohls (1979), 91 Cal.App.3d 271 , 154 Cal.Rptr. 87 , which discussed this issue, Judge Garrard wrote: "'The court expressed concern over the likelihood of a full adversary hearing on the paternity issue given the other concerns the mother might have competing with her desire to establish paternity: reticence to having her past personal life subject to scrutiny; guilty feelings about the dissolution; availability of government aid to support the child; desire to keep the child as hers alone; possible concessions from the alleged father on support and proper

1992Explaining the reasoning of Ruddock v. Ohls (1979), 91 Cal.App.3d 271 , 154 Cal.Rptr. 87 , which discussed this issue, Judge Garrard wrote: "'The court expressed concern over the likelihood of a full adversary hearing on the paternity issue given the other concerns the mother might have competing with her desire to establish paternity: reticence to having her past personal life subject to scrutiny; guilty feelings about the dissolution; availability of government aid to support the child; desire to keep the child as hers alone; possible concessions from the alleged father on support and proper

1996United States v. Pritchard, 973 F.2d 905 , 908 n. 3 (11th Cir.1992).

1996United States v. Pritchard, 973 F.2d 905 , 908 n. 3 (11th Cir.1992).

1992Explaining the reasoning of Ruddock v. Ohls (1979), 91 Cal.App.3d 271 , 154 Cal.Rptr. 87 , which discussed this issue, Judge Garrard wrote: "'The court expressed concern over the likelihood of a full adversary hearing on the paternity issue given the other concerns the mother might have competing with her desire to establish paternity: reticence to having her past personal life subject to scrutiny; guilty feelings about the dissolution; availability of government aid to support the child; desire to keep the child as hers alone; possible concessions from the alleged father on support and proper

1986Link v. Wabash Railroad Company (1962), 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 LEd.2d 734.

1986Link v. Wabash Railroad Company (1962), 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 LEd.2d 734.

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magazi

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magazi

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magaz

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magazi

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magaz

1985Busch v. Projection Room Theater (1976), 17 Cal.3d 42 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 328 , 550 P.2d 600 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 922 , 97 S.Ct. 320 , 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), the California Supreme Court tersely disposes of the issue before us, holding that the Near doctrine precludes the use of temporary or permanent padlock orders against theaters or bookstores found to have violated obscenity laws: We are aware of no reported cases authorizing the closing of a bookstore or theater, even after it has been repeatedly determined judicially in a full adversary hearing that all or substantially all of the magazi

1984Without a showing to the contrary, state administrators "are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances." Id. at 55 , 95 S.Ct. at 1468 (quoting United States v. Morgan, (1941) 313 U.S. 409 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 ).

1984Without a showing to the contrary, state administrators "are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances." Id. at 55 , 95 S.Ct. at 1468 (quoting United States v. Morgan, (1941) 313 U.S. 409 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 ).

1984Without a showing to the contrary, state administrators "are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances." Id. at 55 , 95 S.Ct. at 1468 (quoting United States v. Morgan, (1941) 313 U.S. 409 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 ).

1984Without a showing to the contrary, state administrators "are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances." Id. at 55 , 95 S.Ct. at 1468 (quoting United States v. Morgan, (1941) 313 U.S. 409 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 ).

1981This issue can be determined reliably without an adversary hearing.” Gerstein v. Pugh (1975), 420 U.S. 103, 119-20 , 95 S.Ct. 854, 865-66 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 .

1981This issue can be determined reliably without an adversary hearing.” Gerstein v. Pugh (1975), 420 U.S. 103, 119-20 , 95 S.Ct. 854, 865-66 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 .

1972Joseph Loan, etc., Co. (1916), 66 Ind. App. 500 , 113 N. E. 394 For the reasons specified, we are of the opinion that the transaction here involved is so intertwined and intermingled between the claimant, the personal representative and the decedent’s estate that an adversary hearing as contemplated by IC 1971, 29-1-14-17, Ind. Ann.

1972Joseph Loan, etc., Co. (1916), 66 Ind. App. 500 , 113 N. E. 394 For the reasons specified, we are of the opinion that the transaction here involved is so intertwined and intermingled between the claimant, the personal representative and the decedent’s estate that an adversary hearing as contemplated by IC 1971, 29-1-14-17, Ind. Ann.