adversary hearing in Nevada

2016"An adversary hearing is not required, and the probable cause finding may be based on evidence taken from the petition, sworn investigative reports, witnesses' affidavits, police affidavits, or other informal but reliable evidence." In re Three Minors, 100 Nev. 414, 418 , 684 P.2d 1121, 1123-24 (1984), disapproved of on other grounds by William S., 122 Nev. at 442 n.23, 132 P.3d at 1021 n.23.

1990An adversary hearing is not required, and the probable cause finding may be based on evidence taken from the petition, sworn investigative reports, witnesses’ affidavits, police affidavits, or other informal but reliable evidence.” In re Three Minors, 100 Nev. 414, 418 , 684 P.2d 1121, 1123 (1984).

2020The finding of prosecutive merit "is comparable to the finding that must be made in pre-adjudication detention 3Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2 matters" and does not require an adversary hearing.

2016"An adversary hearing is not required, and the probable cause finding may be based on evidence taken from the petition, sworn investigative reports, witnesses' affidavits, police affidavits, or other informal but reliable evidence." In re Three Minors, 100 Nev. 414, 418 , 684 P.2d 1121, 1123-24 (1984), disapproved of on other grounds by William S., 122 Nev. at 442 n.23, 132 P.3d at 1021 n.23.

2016"An adversary hearing is not required, and the probable cause finding may be based on evidence taken from the petition, sworn investigative reports, witnesses' affidavits, police affidavits, or other informal but reliable evidence." In re Three Minors, 100 Nev. 414, 418 , 684 P.2d 1121, 1123-24 (1984), disapproved of on other grounds by William S., 122 Nev. at 442 n.23, 132 P.3d at 1021 n.23.

1972My views on the requirement of a prior adversary hearing in processing these obscenity cases have been set forth in Glass v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 87 Nev. 321 , 486 P.2d 1180 (1971), and it would serve no purpose to reiterate them in this case.

1972My views on the requirement of a prior adversary hearing in processing these obscenity cases have been set forth in Glass v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 87 Nev. 321 , 486 P.2d 1180 (1971), and it would serve no purpose to reiterate them in this case.

1971We do not believe Marcus and Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases.” Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971We do not believe Marcus and a Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases." Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F. Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 *1189 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971We do not believe Marcus and Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases.” Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971We do not believe Marcus and a Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases." Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F. Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 *1189 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971I have also considered the case of Ledesma v. Perez, 304 F. Supp. 662 (1969), relied upon by Glass, where a three-judge federal court ruled that the arrests and the seizure of allegedly obscene materials were invalid for lack of a prior adversary hearing on the character of the seized materials.

1971I have also considered the case of Ledesma v. Perez, D.C., 304 F. Supp. 662 (1969), relied upon by Glass, where a three-judge federal court ruled that the arrests and the seizure of allegedly obscene materials were invalid for lack of a prior adversary hearing on the character of the seized materials.

1971We do not believe Marcus and Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases.” Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971On February 23, 1971, the United States Supreme Court reversed ( 401 U.S. 82, 84 , 91 S.Ct. 674, 676 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 ), on the ground of an unwarranted interference by the federal courts in the state powers.

1971On February 23, 1971, the United States Supreme Court reversed ( 401 U.S. 82, 84 , 91 S.Ct. 674, 676 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 ), on the ground of an unwarranted interference by the federal courts in the state powers.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir. 1970); reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir. 1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir. 1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir. 1968), for support of its position that an adversary hearing must be conducted prior to seizure.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir. 1970); reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir. 1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir. 1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir. 1968), for support of its position that an adversary hearing must be conducted prior to seizure.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, supra; Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, supra. We express no opinion upon the need for such an adversary hearing in situations other than the one before us. 2.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir. 1970); reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir. 1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir. 1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir. 1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir. 1968), for support of its position that an adversary hearing must be conducted prior to seizure.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, supra; Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, supra. We express no opinion upon the need for such an adversary hearing in situations other than the one before us. 2.

1971The majority relies on A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964); Lee Art Theatre v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636 , 88 S.Ct. 2103 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1313 (1968); Marcus v. Search Warrants, 367 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1961); Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9 Cir.1970), reversed on other grounds; Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan, 420 F.2d 687 (3 Cir.1969); Bethview Amusement Corp. v. Cahn, 416 F.2d 410 (2 Cir.1969); Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639 (4 Cir.1969); Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 (7 Cir.1968), for support of its po

1971We do not believe Marcus and Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases.” Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971We do not believe Marcus and a Quantity of Books can be read to proscribe the application of the ordinary methods of initiating criminal prosecution to obscenity cases." Cf. Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F. Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affirmed 397 *1189 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970), where it was held that an adversary hearing is not a prerequisite to the validity of an arrest for obscenity.

1971On March 29, 1971, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Demich ( 401 U.S. 990 ), vacating the judgment, and remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for reconsideration in light of Perez v. Ledesma, supra. I would prefer to follow the rule of our sister state of California recently announced in Monica Theater v. Municipal Court, 88 Cal.Rptr. 71, 81 (Cal.App.

1971On April 26, 1971, the United States Supreme Court (Justices Black and Douglas dissenting) denied certiorari in Gornto v. Georgia, 402 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 1525 , 28 L.Ed.2d 868 , a case which held that a prior adversary hearing was not necessary for an obscenity determination concerning material that the police had purchased.

1971On April 26, 1971, the United States Supreme Court (Justices Black and Douglas dissenting) denied certiorari in Gornto v. Georgia, 402 U.S. 933 , a case which held that a prior adversary hearing was not necessary for an obscenity determination concerning material that the police had purchased.

1971On April 26, 1971, the United States Supreme Court (Justices Black and Douglas dissenting) denied certiorari in Gornto v. Georgia, 402 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 1525 , 28 L.Ed.2d 868 , a case which held that a prior adversary hearing was not necessary for an obscenity determination concerning material that the police had purchased.

1971The Georgia Supreme Court decision [Gornto v. State, 227 Ga. 46 , 178 S.E.2d 894 (1970)] is summarized as follows in 9 CrL 4020 (4-28-71): "OBSENITY — Magazine entitled `Whiplash Lovers', whose contents consisted solely of nudity and illicit and perverted sexual activity, is obscene; state obscenity statute is constitutional, and the obscenity of the magazine was properly determined by local community standards; the right to privately possess obscene materials does not necessarily imply the right to distribute such materials; no prior adversary hearing *1186 is necessary for obscenity determin

1971The Georgia Supreme Court decision [Gornto v. State, 227 Ga. 46 , 178 S.E.2d 894 (1970)] is summarized as follows in 9 CrL 4020 (4-28-71): "OBSENITY — Magazine entitled `Whiplash Lovers', whose contents consisted solely of nudity and illicit and perverted sexual activity, is obscene; state obscenity statute is constitutional, and the obscenity of the magazine was properly determined by local community standards; the right to privately possess obscene materials does not necessarily imply the right to distribute such materials; no prior adversary hearing *1186 is necessary for obscenity determin