Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1829–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Maddingreen1 sentence2026Bledsoe, 226 S.W.3d at 355 ; State v. Maddin, 192 S.W.3d 558, 562 (Tenn. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Betts v. Badgergreen1 sentence1829See 12 Johns. 223 . 2 T. 5,. 44. 1 Esp. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bledsoe
green
1 sentence2026Bledsoe, 226 S.W.3d at 355 ; State v. Maddin, 192 S.W.3d 558, 562 (Tenn. 2005). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Fehringer v. Fehringer
green
1 sentence2002After reassessing costs half to the life tenant and half against the interest of all contingent remaindermen, the court stated, “A lien will be declared upon the remainder interest only, but its enforcement must await the vesting of those interests.” Id. at 818 . 9 Tenn. at 593, 439 S.W.2d at 261-62 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Mid-South Indoor Horse Racing, Inc. v. Tennessee State Racing Commission
green
1 sentence1997More importantly, if a party has a right to a contested case hearing and is denied one, precluding judicial review of the denial would leave the party with no judicial redress of an obvious violation of the party’s right to a hearing.” In support of its contention that the UAPA is inapplicable, appellant relies upon Mid-South Indoor Horse Racing, Inc. v. Tennessee State Racing Comm’n, 798 S.W.2d 531 (Tenn.App.1990), which involved the issue of the UAPA’s applicability to the review of licensing proceedings in which the plaintiff was denied a license to conduct horse racing. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1981Another instance of alleged misconduct involved the failure of counsel to object to the following testimony by an officer: “And Mrs. Layne asked me, said she would just like to know who turned us in.” (emphasis added) Counsel contends that this was an obvious violation of the rule announced in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), since Pearlie Layne did not testify. 1981Another instance of alleged misconduct involved the failure of counsel to object to the following testimony by an officer: “And Mrs. Layne asked me, said she would just like to know who turned us in.” (emphasis added) Counsel contends that this was an obvious violation of the rule announced in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), since Pearlie Layne did not testify. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Nichols v. Guthrie
green
1 sentence1978First National Bank v. Pointer, 174 Tenn. 472 , 126 S.W.2d 335 (1939); Nichols v. Guthrie, 109 Tenn. 535 , 73 S.W. 107 (1903). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
First Nat. Bank of Springfield v. Pointer
green
2 sentences1978First National Bank v. Pointer, 174 Tenn. 472 , 126 S.W.2d 335 (1939); Nichols v. Guthrie, 109 Tenn. 535 , 73 S.W. 107 (1903). 1978First National Bank v. Pointer, 174 Tenn. 472 , 126 S.W.2d 335 (1939); Nichols v. Guthrie, 109 Tenn. 535 , 73 S.W. 107 (1903). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Memphis City Bank v. Smith
green
1 sentence1931In Bank v. Smith, 110 Tenn., 337, 361 , this court adopted, the following': “. . . that it is allowable to reason back from a judgment to the basis on which it stands, upon the obvious principle that where a conclusion is indisputable, and could have been drawn only from certain premises, the premises are equally conclusive and indisputable with the conclusion, and, if a judgment necessarily determines a particular fact, that determination is conclusive, and requires the same fact to be determined in the same way in all subsequent actions between the same parties, and that a fact is necessaril | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Dalton v. Eller
green
1 sentence1930Dalton v. Eller, supra. The express limitation of the estate of the heir to a life estate, with remainder to her issue, created an obvious exception to the general rule. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Tilghman v. Proctor
green
2 sentences1912Tilghman v. Proctor, 125 U. S. 136 , 8 Sup. Ct. 894, 31 L. 1912Tilghman v. Proctor, 125 U. S. 136 , 8 Sup. Ct. 894, 31 L. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.