8 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Myersgreen2 sentences2012Id. at 609-10. [61] 601 P.2d at 245-47 (Boochever, C.J., dissenting). [62] Id. at 247-48 (discussing Schraff 's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case). [63] Id. at 251 . [64] Id. at 250-51 . [65] 640 P.2d 837 . 2012Id. at 609-10. [61] 601 P.2d at 245-47 (Boochever, C.J., dissenting). [62] Id. at 247-48 (discussing Schraff 's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case). [63] Id. at 251 . [64] Id. at 250-51 . [65] 640 P.2d 837 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mitchellred2 sentences2012Id. at 609-10. . 601 P.2d at 245-47 (Boochever, C.J., dissenting). . 2012Id. at 609-10. [61] 601 P.2d at 245-47 (Boochever, C.J., dissenting). [62] Id. at 247-48 (discussing Schraff 's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case). [63] Id. at 251 . [64] Id. at 250-51 . [65] 640 P.2d 837 . | 1 | 1 |
Peloza v. Freasgreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpinegreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Feichtinger v. Conantgreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Taitgreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Alaska Center for the Environment v. Ruegreen2 sentences2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil 2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Krohn v. State, Department of Fish & Gamegreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
O'CALLAGHAN v. Stategreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Koyukuk River Tribal Task Force on Moose Management v. Ruegreen1 sentence2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Rutgers v. Pilusogreen2 sentences2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil 2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 1 |
Anchorage v. Cookgreen1 sentence1988Anchorage v. Cook, 598 P.2d 939, 942 (Alaska 1979). | 1 | 1 |
Schraff v. Stategreen1 sentence1979See Schraff v. State, 544 P.2d 834, 841-43 (Alaska 1975). | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Dubielgreen2 sentences1975See Spillers v. Simons, 42 Mich. App. 101 , 201 N.W.2d 374 (1972); Flynn v. Little, 141 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio App. 1957); Squires v. McLaughlin, 44 Wash.2d 43 , 265 P.2d 265 (1953). [1] See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 296(1) quoted at page 1 (of dissent) supra. Backing a vehicle without looking or sounding a warning constitutes negligence. 1975See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Rabinowitzred2 sentences1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare 1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare | 1 | 1 |
People v. Smithgreen2 sentences1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare 1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare | 1 | 1 |
McCoy v. Stategreen2 sentences1975See also McCoy v. State, 491 P.2d 127, 141 (Alaska 1971) (Rabinowitz, J. and Connor, J. dissenting in part). [1] The emergency doctrine is based on a showing of a true necessity that is, an imminent and substantial threat to life, health or property. 1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare | 1 | 1 |
| Vale v. Louisianagreen | 1 | 1 |
Lee Ex Rel. Lee v. Stategreen2 sentences1975Lee v. State, 490 P.2d 1206, 1209-10 (Alaska 1971). 1975Lee v. State, 490 P.2d 1206, 1209-10 (Alaska 1971). | 1 | 1 |
Spillers v. Simonsgreen2 sentences1975See Spillers v. Simons, 42 Mich. App. 101 , 201 N.W.2d 374 (1972); Flynn v. Little, 141 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio App. 1957); Squires v. McLaughlin, 44 Wash.2d 43 , 265 P.2d 265 (1953). [1] See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 296(1) quoted at page 1 (of dissent) supra. Backing a vehicle without looking or sounding a warning constitutes negligence. 1975See Spillers v. Simons, 42 Mich. App. 101 , 201 N.W.2d 374 (1972); Flynn v. Little, 141 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio App. 1957); Squires v. McLaughlin, 44 Wash.2d 43 , 265 P.2d 265 (1953). [1] See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 296(1) quoted at page 1 (of dissent) supra. Backing a vehicle without looking or sounding a warning constitutes negligence. | 1 | 1 |
Brandes v. Freitasgreen2 sentences1975See Brandes v. Freitas, 116 Cal. App. 459 , 2 P.2d 830, 831 (1931). 1975See Brandes v. Freitas, 116 Cal. App. 459 , 2 P.2d 830, 831 (1931). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gallmeyer v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 609-10. [61] 601 P.2d at 245-47 (Boochever, C.J., dissenting). [62] Id. at 247-48 (discussing Schraff 's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case). [63] Id. at 251 . [64] Id. at 250-51 . [65] 640 P.2d 837 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska Railroad
green
2 sentences2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil 2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Burke v. Barnes
green
2 sentences2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil 2006The power conferred by this section is exercised for the common health, safety, and welfare of the public and to the extent constitutionally permissible, may not be limited by the terms and conditions of leases, contracts, or other transactions. [16] Eklutna II, 87 P.3d at 47 . [17] Id. at 54-55 . [18] Id. (quoting Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142 , 286 A.2d 697, 702 (1972)). [19] Id. at 55. [20] Id. [21] AS 42.40.190(b) provides that an emergency rule adopted by the Railroad Board remains in effect "for not more than 120 days." [22] The proposed legislation, contained in Senate Bil | 1 | 2006–2006 |
McClymont v. Morgan
green
1 sentence1996Id. *1206 Other courts, while not banning the instruction altogether, have strongly discouraged its use. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Minnis v. Friend green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
United States v. Jeffers
green
2 sentences1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare 1975People v. Smith, 7 Cal.3d 282 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 893 , 496 P.2d 1261, 1263 (1972); see also Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct. 1969, 1972 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 414 (1970); United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 52 , 72 S.Ct. 93, 95 , 96 L.Ed. 59 , 64 (1951). [1] 491 P.2d at 131 . [2] United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 72 , 70 S.Ct. 430, 437 , 94 L.Ed. 653, 663-64 (1950) (citations omitted). [3] 491 P.2d at 141 . [4] I cannot accept the majority's statement that "... the packet was not firmly within police custody at the time that it was seized." In the case at bar there were appare | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Ferrell v. Baxter
green
2 sentences1975Essentially the same situation arose in Ferrell v. Baxter, 484 P.2d 250 (Alaska 1971), where the trial court refused to supplement a general negligence instruction with an emergency instruction because the latter was "redundant" and therefore "improper". 1975Essentially the same situation arose in Ferrell v. Baxter, 484 P.2d 250 (Alaska 1971), where the trial court refused to supplement a general negligence instruction with an emergency instruction because the latter was “redundant” and therefore “improper”. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Reese v. Buhle
green
2 sentences1975App.2d 13 , 147 N.E.2d 431 (1957), an emergency instruction was held improper because it was "inconsistent" with the defendant's legal duty to anticipate certain types of conduct, and hence was inappropriate under the facts of that case. 1975In Reese v. Buhle, 16 Ill.App.2d 13 , 147 N.E.2d 431 (1957), an emergency instruction was held improper because it was “inconsistent” with the defendant’s legal duty to anticipate certain types of conduct, and hence was inappropriate under the facts of that case. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Squires v. McLaughlin
green
2 sentences1975See Spillers v. Simons, 42 Mich. App. 101 , 201 N.W.2d 374 (1972); Flynn v. Little, 141 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio App. 1957); Squires v. McLaughlin, 44 Wash.2d 43 , 265 P.2d 265 (1953). [1] See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 296(1) quoted at page 1 (of dissent) supra. Backing a vehicle without looking or sounding a warning constitutes negligence. 1975See Spillers v. Simons, 42 Mich. App. 101 , 201 N.W.2d 374 (1972); Flynn v. Little, 141 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio App. 1957); Squires v. McLaughlin, 44 Wash.2d 43 , 265 P.2d 265 (1953). [1] See Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 at 297 (Alaska 1962), involving application of brakes while driving on ice, although not referring to the emergency doctrine. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 296(1) quoted at page 1 (of dissent) supra. Backing a vehicle without looking or sounding a warning constitutes negligence. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Flynn v. Little neutral | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences1975In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 224 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), the court reiterated that consent must be voluntary and stated that conduct while drugged does not meet that requirement. [10] An extended analysis of the emergency exception was offered by Chief Justice Warren Burger, when he was sitting as an appellate judge on the D.C. 1975In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 224 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), the court reiterated that consent must be voluntary and stated that conduct while drugged does not meet that requirement. [10] An extended analysis of the emergency exception was offered by Chief Justice Warren Burger, when he was sitting as an appellate judge on the D.C. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Meyst v. East Fifth Avenue Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences1975This holding, with which our own decisions in Meyst v. East Fifth Avenue Service Inc., 401 P.2d 430 (Alaska 1963) and Ferrell v. Baxter, 484 P.2d 250 (Alaska 1971), agree, is not dispositive of the issue in the instant case. 1975This holding, with which our own decisions in Meyst v. East Fifth Avenue Service Inc., 401 P.2d 430 (Alaska 1963) and Ferrell v. Baxter, 484 P.2d 250 (Alaska 1971), agree, is not dispositive of the issue in the instant case. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| State ex rel. Nienaber v. District Court neutral | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Kangas v. Standard Accident Insurance green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Rooney v. Overseas Ry., Inc. green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Ranson-Rooney v. Overseas Railway, Inc. neutral | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.