8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1958–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Wilkesgreen2 sentences1989But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim. . . . " 231 Ala. 511 , 518 , 165 So. 764 , 770 . 1989But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim. . . . " 231 Ala. 511 , 518 , 165 So. 764 , 770 . | 1 | 2 |
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Masongreen1 sentence2007Moreover, I believe that the per curiam opinion reads two recent decisions by our supreme court Carlton, supra, and Continental National Indemnity Co. v. Fields, 926 So.2d 1033 (Ala.2005) too broadly when it holds that "if an insured's cause of action against the uninsured motorist is subject to a legal bar, . . . the insured does not have an actionable claim against an uninsured motorist such that a claim may properly be made against a UM insurance carrier based upon that conduct." 982 So.2d at 510. | 1 | 1 |
Singleton v. Burchfieldgreen1 sentence2007Accord Singleton v. Burchfield, 362 F.Supp.2d 1291, 1296 (M.D.Ala.2005) (dismissing claims for UM benefits against insurer because federal statute immunized alleged uninsured motorist from liability to insured). *511 The Alabama Supreme Court's holdings in Carlton and Fields lead us to the conclusion that Mason, at the time he brought this action against his UM insurance carrier, was not "legally entitled to recover" damages against the uninsured motorist directly responsible for his injuries. | 1 | 1 |
American Road Serv. Co. v. Inmongreen1 sentence1989See American Road Service Co. v. Inmon , 394 So.2d 361 (Ala. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Carlton
green
1 sentence2007Moreover, I believe that the per curiam opinion reads two recent decisions by our supreme court Carlton, supra, and Continental National Indemnity Co. v. Fields, 926 So.2d 1033 (Ala.2005) too broadly when it holds that "if an insured's cause of action against the uninsured motorist is subject to a legal bar, . . . the insured does not have an actionable claim against an uninsured motorist such that a claim may properly be made against a UM insurance carrier based upon that conduct." 982 So.2d at 510. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. Fields
green
1 sentence2007Moreover, I believe that the per curiam opinion reads two recent decisions by our supreme court Carlton, supra, and Continental National Indemnity Co. v. Fields, 926 So.2d 1033 (Ala.2005) too broadly when it holds that "if an insured's cause of action against the uninsured motorist is subject to a legal bar, . . . the insured does not have an actionable claim against an uninsured motorist such that a claim may properly be made against a UM insurance carrier based upon that conduct." 982 So.2d at 510. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Henderson v. Wade Sand & Gravel Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence1989As explained in Henderson v. Wade Sand Gravel Co. , 388 So.2d 900 , 902 (Ala. 1980) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts , § 857 (1979), pp. 256-57): " 'As between persons using the water on the underlying land, the American rule made no apportionment among users and gave no protection to their wells and springs. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Busby v. Truswal Systems Corp.
green
1 sentence1989In Busby v. Truswal Systems Corp. , 551 So.2d 322 (Ala. 1989), this Court held that a plant supervisor's persistent and calculated sexual harassment of his female employees at work presented evidence from which a jury could reasonably find the supervisor guilty of the tort of outrageous conduct. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,189 First Virginia Bankshares v. Alan Benson
green
1 sentence1987See § 6-5-101; Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union v. Poston, 460 So.2d 139 (Ala.1984); First Virginia Bankshares v. Benson, 559 F.2d 1307 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
ARMY AVIATION CTR. FED. CREDIT U. v. Poston
green
1 sentence1987See § 6-5-101; Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union v. Poston, 460 So.2d 139 (Ala.1984); First Virginia Bankshares v. Benson, 559 F.2d 1307 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bennett v. Norban
green
2 sentences1983Indeed, no information was obtained surreptitiously in Norris , 3 nor was any information gained surreptitiously in Bennett v. Norban , 396 Pa. 94 , 151 A.2d 476 (1959), cited by this Court in Norris . 1983Indeed, no information was obtained surreptitiously in Norris , 3 nor was any information gained surreptitiously in Bennett v. Norban , 396 Pa. 94 , 151 A.2d 476 (1959), cited by this Court in Norris . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Pottinger v. State
green
2 sentences1980But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim . . . . 231 Ala. 511 at 518, 165 So. 276 . 1980But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim .... 231 Ala. 511 at 518 , 165 So. 276 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Wilkes
green
2 sentences1958But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim.” See also second appeal Wilkes case, supra, 236 Ala. 173 , 181 So. 276 . 1958But if the waters are drained without a reasonable need to do so, or are willfully or negligently wasted in such operation in a way and manner as that it should have been anticipated to occur, and as a proximate result the damage accrued to the surface owners so affected, including adjoining landowners, there is an actionable claim.” See also second appeal Wilkes case, supra, 236 Ala. 173 , 181 So. 276 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.