articulated standard (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

articulated standard in Connecticut

8 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Tracy v. New Milford Public Schoolsgreen
conn · 2007 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Tracy v. New Milford Public Schools, 101 Conn. App. 560, 567-70 , 922 A.2d 280 (conduct not outrageous where supervisor conspired with superintendent in pattern of harassment including denial of position, initiating disciplinary actions without proper investigation, defamation of character and intimidation), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 935 (2007).

2011See, e.g., Tracy v. New Milford Public Schools, 101 Conn. App. 560, 567-70 , 922 A.2d 280 (conduct not outrageous where supervisor conspired with superintendent in pattern of harassment including denial of position, initiating disciplinary actions without proper investigation, defamation of character and intimidation), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 935 (2007).

11
Tracy v. New Milford Public Schoolsgreen
connappct · 2007 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Tracy v. New Milford Public Schools, 101 Conn. App. 560, 567-70 , 922 A.2d 280 (conduct not outrageous where supervisor conspired with superintendent in pattern of harassment including denial of position, initiating disciplinary actions without proper investigation, defamation of character and intimidation), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 935 (2007).

2011See, e.g., Tracy v. New Milford Public Schools, 101 Conn. App. 560, 567-70 , 922 A.2d 280 (conduct not outrageous where supervisor conspired with superintendent in pattern of harassment including denial of position, initiating disciplinary actions without proper investigation, defamation of character and intimidation), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 935 (2007).

11
Appleton v. Board of Educationgreen
conn · 2000 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., Appleton v. Board of Education, 254 Conn. 205, 210-12 , 757 A.2d 1059 (2000) (principal’s making condescending comments in front of colleagues, questioning plaintiffs vision and ability to read, telephoning daughter to say plaintiff acting differently and asking police to escort plaintiff from school not intentional infliction of emotional distress); Petyan v. Ellis, supra, 200 Conn. 254 (stating reason for terminating employment, mainly for fraud and lying, on form for unemployment compensation not extreme and outrageous, as employer was exercising legal right).

2007See, e.g., Appleton v. Board of Education, 254 Conn. 205, 210-12 , 757 A.2d 1059 (2000) (principal’s making condescending comments in front of colleagues, questioning plaintiffs vision and ability to read, telephoning daughter to say plaintiff acting differently and asking police to escort plaintiff from school not intentional infliction of emotional distress); Petyan v. Ellis, supra, 200 Conn. 254 (stating reason for terminating employment, mainly for fraud and lying, on form for unemployment compensation not extreme and outrageous, as employer was exercising legal right).

11
State v. Smithgreen
conn · 1988 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11
State v. Johnsongreen
connappct · 1987 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11
Osborn v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.green
iowa · 1980 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985“When a party uses a deposition taken by his opponent, but not offered in evidence by him, he makes it his own, and his opponent has the same right of objection to the interrogatories and answers which he would have had if the deposition had been taken by the party offering it; and he is not precluded by the fact that the interrogatories objected to were propounded by himself when the deposition was taken.” Accord Osborn v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 290 N.W.2d 893, 899 (Iowa 1980); Baltimore & Ohio R.

11
Hatch v. Browngreen
· 1874 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985In the venerable case of Hatch v. Brown, 63 Me. 410, 416 (1874), the court articulated the rule that has been consistently followed.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Loisel v. Rowe green
conn · 1995
2 sentences

2015This court articulated the test governing the applica- tion of this exception in Loisel v. Rowe, 233 Conn. 370, 378 , 660 A.2d 323 (1995).

2015This court articulated the test governing the applica- tion of this exception in Loisel v. Rowe, 233 Conn. 370, 378 , 660 A.2d 323 (1995).

12015–2015
McHugh v. McHugh green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

2007The burden is not on either party to inquire, but on each to inform, for it is only by requiring full disclosure of the amount, character, and value of the parties' respective assets that courts can ensure intelligent waiver of the statutory rights involved." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) McHugh v. McHugh, supra, 181 Conn. at 486-87 , 436 A.2d 8 .

2007The burden is not on either party to inquire, but on each to inform, for it is only by requiring full disclosure of the amount, character, and value of the parties' respective assets that courts can ensure intelligent waiver of the statutory rights involved." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) McHugh v. McHugh, supra, 181 Conn. at 486-87 , 436 A.2d 8 .

12007–2007
State v. Troupe green
conn · 1996
2 sentences

2002The court noted, however, that the articulated doctrine “does not affect those cases in which the details of a sexual assault complaint are otherwise admissible . . . .” Id., 304 n.19.

2002The court also held that “the trial court must balance the probative value of the evidence against any prejudice to the defendant.” Id., 305 .

12002–2002
Shew v. Freedom of Information Commission green
conn · 1998
1 sentence

2001In June of 1998 our Supreme Court in Shew v. Freedom of Information Commission , 245 Conn. 149 , 158 (1998) recognized that the attorney-client privilege protects communications in circumstances where the client is a municipality. 4 The Court articulated the test to be utilized in a particular case to determine whether the privilege applied.

12001–2001
Payne v. Robinson green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994
Payne v. Robinson green
connappct · 1987
2 sentences

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994
State v. Roberson green
conn · 1973
2 sentences

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994
Daloia v. Rose green
scotus · 1988
1 sentence

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994
Ochoa-Ochoa v. United States green
scotus · 1988
1 sentence

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994
Plyler v. Evatt green
scotus · 1988
1 sentence

1994This is particularly so because of the dicta in our prior decisions referring to the ‘reasonable satisfaction’ standard.” State v. Davis, supra, 229 Conn. 302 -303; see State v. Smith, 207 Conn. 152, 167 , 540 A.2d 679 (1988); State v. Roberson, 165 Conn. 73, 80 , 327 A.2d 556 (1973); see also State v. Johnson, 11 Conn. App. 251, 258 , 527 A.2d 250 (1987); Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 403 , 523 A.2d 917 (1987), aff'd, 207 Conn. 565 , 541 A.2d 504 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898 , 109 S. Ct. 242 , 102 L.

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

LA 297 (1979–2024) CA 35 (1979–2026) FL 23 (1976–2026) TX 22 (1988–2025) TN 20 (2002–2020) NJ 19 (1981–2025) WA 18 (1980–2025) MD 17 (1991–2015) MI 16 (1992–2026) NY 14 (1967–2022) PA 12 (1977–2026) WV 12 (1979–2016) GA 12 (1993–2023) MS 11 (1992–2006) OH 10 (1977–2021) IL 10 (1992–2025) DC 9 (1976–2001) NC 8 (1979–2024) CT 8 (1985–2015) IN 8 (1977–2016) RI 8 (1998–2010) ID 7 (1977–2022) MT 7 (1979–2006) UT 7 (1990–2019) HI 7 (1992–2019) MA 6 (1990–2025) VA 6 (1993–2024) OR 6 (1991–2011) IA 6 (1982–2017) CO 5 (1991–2016) DE 4 (1990–2026) ND 4 (1995–2016) WI 4 (1988–2009) SC 4 (1989–2013) NM 4 (1991–2023) AL 3 (1991–2017) AZ 3 (1978–2025) OK 3 (1988–2012) AK 3 (1972–1996) MO 3 (1986–1996) WY 3 (1987–1994) MN 3 (1979–2000) KS 2 (2012–2016) NE 2 (2014–2017) NV 2 (1996–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check