Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cullison v. Medleygreen2 sentences2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Frederick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiff’s grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners ne 2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Fredrick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiffs grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners negligentl | 2 | 3 |
Tracey M. Jaffri v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.green2 sentences2018Furthermore, even if West intended to trigger the AG Action, as a matter of law, we cannot say that her statements were so outrageous in character or extreme in degree that her actions can be regarded as atrocious or utterly intolerable in a civilized community.22 See Jaffri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 26 N.E.3d 635, 640 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (holding that even assuming defendant intentionally mishandled mortgage-related documents, such conduct is not “the type of beyond-the-pale, ‘outrageous’ conduct that may be covered by an IIED claim”); cf. Mitchell v. Stevenson, 677 N.E.2d 551 (Ind. Ct. 2018Furthermore, even if West intended to trigger the AG Action, as a matter of law, we cannot say that her statements were so outrageous in character or extreme in degree that her actions can be regarded as atrocious or utterly intolerable in a civilized community.22 See Jaffri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 26 N.E.3d 635, 640 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (holding that even assuming defendant intentionally mishandled mortgage-related documents, such conduct is not “the type of beyond-the-pale, ‘outrageous’ conduct that may be covered by an IIED claim”); cf. Mitchell v. Stevenson, 677 N.E.2d 551 (Ind. Ct. | 2 | 2 |
York v. Fredrickgreen2 sentences2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Frederick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiff’s grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners ne 2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Fredrick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiffs grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners negligentl | 2 | 2 |
Bradley v. Hallgreen2 sentences2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Frederick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiff’s grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners ne 2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Fredrick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiffs grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners negligentl | 2 | 2 |
Lachenman v. Sticegreen2 sentences2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Frederick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiff’s grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners ne 2013Compare Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 27 (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when neighbor grabbed at his holstered gun and shook it at plaintiff during an altercation), and York v. Fredrick, 947 N.E.2d 969 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when funeral-home personnel forced the plaintiffs grandmother’s casket into the vault, resulting in damage to the casket and moisture and dirt inside the casket), trans. denied, and Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (summary judgment dismissing IIED claim appropriate when dog owners negligentl | 2 | 2 |
Tucker v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Lafayette-In-Indianagreen2 sentences2015See Tucker, 837 N.E.2d at 603 . [17] Even if everything occurred that Jaffri alleges—that Chase intentionally mishandled her HAMP applications and thereby caused her emotional distress— such facts would not establish an IIED claim. 2015See Tucker, 837 N.E.2d at 603 . [17] Even if everything occurred that Jaffri alleges—that Chase intentionally mishandled her HAMP applications and thereby caused her emotional distress— such facts would not establish an IIED claim. | 1 | 1 |
Rambo v. Cohengreen2 sentences2008He relies on Rambo v. Cohen, 587 N.E.2d 140, 146 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (plaintiff in a defamation action can recover for emotional and physical harm only on a showing of special damages; emotional and physical harms are not special damages unto themselves, but rather are parasitic damages, viable only when attached to normal (i.e., pecuniaiy) special damages), reh’g denied, trans. denied. 2008He relies on Rambo v. Cohen, 587 N.E.2d 140, 146 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (plaintiff in a defamation action can recover for emotional and physical harm only on a showing of special damages; emotional and physical harms are not special damages unto themselves, but rather are parasitic damages, viable only when attached to normal (i.e., pecuniaiy) special damages), reh’g denied, trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Stevenson
green
2 sentences2018Furthermore, even if West intended to trigger the AG Action, as a matter of law, we cannot say that her statements were so outrageous in character or extreme in degree that her actions can be regarded as atrocious or utterly intolerable in a civilized community.22 See Jaffri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 26 N.E.3d 635, 640 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (holding that even assuming defendant intentionally mishandled mortgage-related documents, such conduct is not “the type of beyond-the-pale, ‘outrageous’ conduct that may be covered by an IIED claim”); cf. Mitchell v. Stevenson, 677 N.E.2d 551 (Ind. Ct. 2018Furthermore, even if West intended to trigger the AG Action, as a matter of law, we cannot say that her statements were so outrageous in character or extreme in degree that her actions can be regarded as atrocious or utterly intolerable in a civilized community.22 See Jaffri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 26 N.E.3d 635, 640 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (holding that even assuming defendant intentionally mishandled mortgage-related documents, such conduct is not “the type of beyond-the-pale, ‘outrageous’ conduct that may be covered by an IIED claim”); cf. Mitchell v. Stevenson, 677 N.E.2d 551 (Ind. Ct. | 2 | 2016–2018 |
Gilman v. Gilman
green
2 sentences2008In Gilman v. Gilman, 46 Conn. Supp. 21 , 736 A.2d 199 (1999), Gilman’s former wife told police he was smoking marijuana at his home. 2008In Gilman v. Gilman, 46 Conn. Supp. 21 , 736 A.2d 199 (1999), Gilman’s former wife told police he was smoking marijuana at his home. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell
green
2 sentences2007The Court applied the actual malice defamation standard to Falwell’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim (IIED claim) and held that Falwell could not recover on the IIED claim because the parody “was not reasonably believable.” Id. 2007The Court applied the actual malice defamation standard to Falwell’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim (IIED claim) and held that Falwell could not recover on the IIED claim because the parody “was not reasonably believable.” Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.