coverage waiver (New Mexico) · Go Syfert
← New Mexico issues

coverage waiver in New Mexico

8 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Madrid v. Village of Chamagreen
nmctapp · 2012 · cited in 3 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014
2 sentences

2014See Madrid, 2012-NMCA-071, ¶ 17 (explaining that “our appellate courts have never required trial courts to consider the merits of a plaintiffs allegations when deciding a motion to dismiss, and we see no justification for requiring such technical forms of pleadings now”).

2013See Madrid, 2012-NMCA-071, ¶ 17 (explaining that “our appellate courts have never required trial courts to consider the merits of a plaintiff's allegations when deciding a motion to dismiss, and we see no justification for requiring such technical forms of pleadings now”).

33
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hokansongreen
kanctapp · 1978 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987Co. v. Hokanson, 2 Kan.App.2d 580, 580 , 584 P.2d 1264, 1265 (1978): The term “use” in a coverage clause of an insuring agreement is given a broad, general and comprehensive meaning effecting broad coverage and it includes any exercise of control over the vehicle regardless of its purpose, extent, or duration.

1987Co. v. Hokanson, 2 Kan.App.2d 580, 580 , 584 P.2d 1264, 1265 (1978): The term “use” in a coverage clause of an insuring agreement is given a broad, general and comprehensive meaning effecting broad coverage and it includes any exercise of control over the vehicle regardless of its purpose, extent, or duration.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Dove v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. green
nmctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2024Dove, 2017-NMCA-051, ¶ 16 .

2024Dove, 2017-NMCA-051, ¶ 16 .

32023–2024
Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance green
nm · 1995
2 sentences

2019Applying the coverage test adopted by our Supreme Court in Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co., 1995-NMSC-075 , 120 N.M. 813 , 907 P.2d 994 , to the stipulated facts, the district court determined Haygood’s injuries had not arisen from the use of the uninsured motor vehicle.

2019Applying the coverage test adopted by our Supreme Court in Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co., 1995-NMSC-075 , 120 N.M. 813 , 907 P.2d 994 , to the stipulated facts, the district court determined Haygood’s injuries had not arisen from the use of the uninsured motor vehicle.

12019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NM § N.M. Stat. § 66-5-301 (4) NM § N.M. Stat. § 39-3-4 (3) NM § N.M. Stat. § 44-7B-4 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 101 (1959–2025) FL 36 (1963–2025) WI 32 (1932–2022) LA 32 (1942–2021) TX 24 (1940–2025) NJ 18 (1924–2026) PA 18 (1967–2025) IL 18 (1981–2023) AZ 16 (1978–2017) NY 12 (1917–2026) MO 10 (1930–2014) HI 10 (1970–2015) WA 9 (1941–2023) GA 9 (1973–2018) NM 8 (1987–2024) DE 7 (1970–2024) MD 7 (1971–2006) MN 7 (1998–2014) IA 6 (1997–2016) KY 6 (1943–2025) AL 6 (1950–2003) MA 6 (1988–2012) KS 5 (1981–2007) IN 4 (2008–2017) CO 4 (1999–2009) OH 4 (1990–2026) ND 4 (1992–2024) MI 4 (1985–1998) AK 3 (1993–2003) WY 3 (1968–1993) VA 2 (1936–2023) OR 2 (2008–2015) ME 2 (2006–2012) NE 2 (2013–2018) VT 2 (2002–2004) DC 2 (1987–2023) UT 2 (2012–2012) SC 2 (1991–2019) WV 2 (1952–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check