coverage rule (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

coverage rule in Alabama

6 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Tillman v. Woodgreen
· 1877 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
2 sentences

1980A fifty cents per page charge is applicable to copies of records which are not certified.” (Emphasis is added.) Opinion No. 10, quoting from Tillman v. Wood, 58 Ala. 578, 579 (1877), stated that “[t]he fees referred to in Rule 45 are charges made for services rendered individuals not in the course of litigation.” A further amendment to Rule 45, effective December 5, 1977, among other things, replaced the words, “is hereby established,” and “is applicable to,” with the words, “shall be charged.” It deleted the words, “requested from any court clerk or register,” added the words, “made by any cl

1980This Court, in Tillman v. Wood, 58 Ala. 578 , also stated the following: “Costs and fees were originally altogether different in their nature.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Pickron v. State green
alacrimapp · 1985
1 sentence

2003In affirming this holding, our supreme court noted that "the provisions of subsection (d) [now Rule 24.4] regarding denial of such a motion by operation of law would also apply." 475 So.2d at 600 n. 1.

12003–2003
Griffith v. State neutral
alacrimapp · 1989
1 sentence

1992In fact, a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is the functional equivalent of a motion for new trial, and we see no reason to treat the two motions differently. 3 We note that in Griffith v. State , 545 So.2d 236 (Ala. 1989), the defendant's motion to withdraw his pleas was filed more than two months after sentence was pronounced and was, nevertheless, considered and denied by the trial court after an evidentiary hearing, then was reviewed on appeal by this Court.

11992–1992
Pickron v. State green
alacrimapp · 1984
1 sentence

1991He relies primarily on the language and holding in Pickron v. State , 475 So.2d 593 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd, 475 So.2d 599 (Ala. 1985), to support his contention, wherein we held, inter alia, that "[a]lthough a motion to amend the sentence does not come within the precise language of Rule 13(c), we think it is within the coverage thereof in light of the clear intent of Rule 13 captioned "Post-trial motions." " Id. at 598.

11991–1991
Pickron v. State green
ala · 1985
1 sentence

1991He relies primarily on the language and holding in Pickron v. State , 475 So.2d 593 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd, 475 So.2d 599 (Ala. 1985), to support his contention, wherein we held, inter alia, that "[a]lthough a motion to amend the sentence does not come within the precise language of Rule 13(c), we think it is within the coverage thereof in light of the clear intent of Rule 13 captioned "Post-trial motions." " Id. at 598.

11991–1991
Thompson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. green
ala · 1984
1 sentence

1990Co. , 460 So.2d 1264 (Ala. 1984).

11990–1990
Bankers Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Draper neutral
ala · 1942
2 sentences

1950Co. v. Draper, 242 Ala. 601 , 7 So. 2d 299, 302 , we refused to extend that theory to a clause in a policy which covered the “following described property while located and contained as described herein and not elsewhere.” We held that the condition as to the location of the property could be waived and that by doing so the principle of adding property to the coverage by waiver or estoppel did not apply.

1950Co. v. Draper, 242 Ala. 601 , 7 So. 2d 299, 302 , we refused to extend that theory to a clause in a policy which covered the “following described property while located and contained as described herein and not elsewhere.” We held that the condition as to the location of the property could be waived and that by doing so the principle of adding property to the coverage by waiver or estoppel did not apply.

11950–1950

Where else courts name it

CA 101 (1959–2025) FL 36 (1963–2025) WI 32 (1932–2022) LA 32 (1942–2021) TX 24 (1940–2025) NJ 18 (1924–2026) PA 18 (1967–2025) IL 18 (1981–2023) AZ 16 (1978–2017) NY 12 (1917–2026) MO 10 (1930–2014) HI 10 (1970–2015) WA 9 (1941–2023) GA 9 (1973–2018) NM 8 (1987–2024) DE 7 (1970–2024) MD 7 (1971–2006) MN 7 (1998–2014) IA 6 (1997–2016) KY 6 (1943–2025) AL 6 (1950–2003) MA 6 (1988–2012) KS 5 (1981–2007) IN 4 (2008–2017) CO 4 (1999–2009) OH 4 (1990–2026) ND 4 (1992–2024) MI 4 (1985–1998) AK 3 (1993–2003) WY 3 (1968–1993) VA 2 (1936–2023) OR 2 (2008–2015) ME 2 (2006–2012) NE 2 (2013–2018) VT 2 (2002–2004) DC 2 (1987–2023) UT 2 (2012–2012) SC 2 (1991–2019) WV 2 (1952–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check