59 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Parkinsongreen2 sentences2026State v. Roe, 140 Idaho 176, 181 , 90 P.3d 926, 931 (Ct. App. 2004); State v. Parkinson, 135 Idaho 357, 361 , 17 P.3d 301, 305 (Ct. App. 2000). 2026State v. Roe, 140 Idaho 176, 181 , 90 P.3d 926, 931 (Ct. App. 2004); State v. Parkinson, 135 Idaho 357, 361 , 17 P.3d 301, 305 (Ct. App. 2000). | 45 | 49 |
State v. Roegreen2 sentences2026State v. Roe, 140 Idaho 176, 181 , 90 P.3d 926, 931 (Ct. App. 2004); State v. Parkinson, 135 Idaho 357, 361 , 17 P.3d 301, 305 (Ct. App. 2000). 2026State v. Roe, 140 Idaho 176, 181 , 90 P.3d 926, 931 (Ct. App. 2004); State v. Parkinson, 135 Idaho 357, 361 , 17 P.3d 301, 305 (Ct. App. 2000). | 44 | 48 |
State v. Bishopgreen2 sentences2023IV; State v. Bishop, 146 Idaho 804, 810 , 203 P.3d 1203, 1209 (2009).3 The determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry--whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. 2023IV; State v. Bishop, 146 Idaho 804, 810 , 203 P.3d 1203, 1209 (2009).3 The determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry--whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. | 3 | 3 |
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2000Applicable Law As stated in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 904-08 (1968), the determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry — (1) “whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception” and (2) “whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” 3 Here, Parkinson does not contest the basis for the stop. 2000Applicable Law As stated in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 904-08 (1968), the determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry — (1) “whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception” and (2) “whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” 3 Here, Parkinson does not contest the basis for the stop. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Jose Perez-Jungogreen2 sentences2015State v. Perez-Jungo, 156 Idaho 609, 614 , 329 P.3d 391, 396 (Ct.App.2014). 2015State v. Perez-Jungo, 156 Idaho 609, 614 , 329 P.3d 391, 396 (Ct.App.2014). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Cortezgreen1 sentence2010United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 (1981); State v. Flowers, 131 Idaho 205, 208 , 953 P.2d 645, 648 (Ct. App. 1998). 2 The determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry--whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Flowersgreen2 sentences2010United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 (1981); State v. Flowers, 131 Idaho 205, 208 , 953 P.2d 645, 648 (Ct. App. 1998). 2 The determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry--whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. 2010United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 (1981); State v. Flowers, 131 Idaho 205, 208 , 953 P.2d 645, 648 (Ct. App. 1998). 2 The determination of whether an investigative detention is reasonable requires a dual inquiry--whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. | 1 | 1 |
Taggart v. Highway Board for the North Latah County Highway Districtgreen2 sentences2002Taggart v. Highway Bd. For N. Latah Cty., 115 Idaho 816, 817 , 771 P.2d 37, 38 (1988). 2002Taggart v. Highway Bd. For N. Latah Cty., 115 Idaho 816, 817 , 771 P.2d 37, 38 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Maryland
red
2 sentences1986Justice Harlan, in a concurring opinion later adopted by the full Court in Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 , 99 S.Ct. 2577 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979), articulated the familiar dual test for determining whether an accused person’s fourth amendment rights have been implicated by a search. 1986Justice Harlan, in a concurring opinion later adopted by the full Court in Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 , 99 S.Ct. 2577 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979), articulated the familiar dual test for determining whether an accused person’s fourth amendment rights have been implicated by a search. | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Bingham v. Idaho Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences1990Bingham v. Idaho Dept. of Transportation, 117 Idaho at 150 , 786 P.2d at 541 . 1990Bingham v. Idaho Dept. of Transportation, 117 Idaho at 150 , 786 P.2d at 541 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.