8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Estabrookgreen2 sentences2019See Commonwealth v. Estabrook, 472 Mass. 852, 858 , 38 N.E.3d 231 (2015) (concluding no warrant is required to obtain historical CSLI relating to a period of six hours or less). 2019See Commonwealth v. Estabrook, 472 Mass. 852, 858 , 38 N.E.3d 231 (2015) (concluding no warrant is required to obtain historical CSLI relating to a period of six hours or less). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Watson v. Hockett
green
2 sentences2015The majority acknowledges that we have said the instruction must be given "'with caution."' Majority at 10 (quoting Watson, 107 Wn.2d at 165 ). 2015The majority acknowledges that we have said the instruction must be given “ ‘with caution.’ ” Majority at 805 (quoting Watson, 107 Wn.2d at 165 ). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Cleveland
green
2 sentences2005In People v. Cleveland, 25 Cal. 4th 466 , 21 P.3d 1225 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313 (2001), the California Supreme Court rejected the reasoning here and in Symington and held that a juror could be constitutionally discharged if “it appears as a ‘demonstrable reality’ that the juror is unable or unwilling to deliberate.” Id. at 484. 2005In People v. Cleveland, 25 Cal. 4th 466 , 21 P.3d 1225 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313 (2001), the California Supreme Court rejected the reasoning here and in Symington and held that a juror could be constitutionally discharged if “it appears as a ‘demonstrable reality’ that the juror is unable or unwilling to deliberate.” Id. at 484. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Graham v. Florida
green
1 sentence2020“We are free to evolve our state constitutional framework as novel issues arise to ensure the most appropriate factors are considered.” Id. at 85 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
United States v. Janis
green
2 sentences1982Ed. 2d 343 , 99 S. Ct. 2627 (1979), Chief Justice Burger noted that "[t]he purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter unlawful police action." Accord, United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 445-47 , 49 L. 1982Ed. 2d 343 , 99 S. Ct. 2627 (1979), Chief Justice Burger noted that "[t]he purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter unlawful police action." Accord, United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 445-47 , 49 L. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Gardner v. Malone
green
2 sentences1982As the court said in Gardner v. Malone, 60 Wn.2d 836, 841 , 376 P.2d 651 (1962): In spite of this criticism, we believe a workable rule has evolved from our decisions. 1982As the court said in Gardner v. Malone, 60 Wn.2d 836, 841 , 376 P.2d 651 (1962): In spite of this criticism, we believe a workable rule has evolved from our decisions. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Michigan v. DeFillippo
green
2 sentences1982We believe the objective probable cause standard is the only workable test in cases such as the one before us. 7 Const. art. 1, § 7 provides: "No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law." 8 In Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31 , 38 n.3, 61 L. 1982We believe the objective probable cause standard is the only workable test in cases such as the one before us. 7 Const. art. 1, § 7 provides: "No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law." 8 In Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31 , 38 n.3, 61 L. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.