7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. McKay
green
2 sentences2014Doe, 183 Ill. 2d at 282-83 . 2014Doe, 183 Ill. 2d at 282-83 . | 3 | 2014–2014 |
Stewart v. Williams
green
2 sentences2008In making this statement, the Georgia Supreme Court cited the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides a workable test where the arresting officers are effecting a facially valid warrant: “ ‘An arrest under a warrant is not privileged unless the person arrested (a) is a person sufficiently named or otherwise described in the warrant and is, or is reasonably believed by the actor to be, the person intended, or (b) although not such person, has knowingly caused the actor to believe him to be so.’ ” Stewart, 243 Ga. at 583 , 255 S.E.2d at 702 , quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts §125, at 2008In making this statement, the Georgia Supreme Court cited the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides a workable test where the arresting officers are effecting a facially valid warrant: “ ‘An arrest under a warrant is not privileged unless the person arrested (a) is a person sufficiently named or otherwise described in the warrant and is, or is reasonably believed by the actor to be, the person intended, or (b) although not such person, has knowingly caused the actor to believe him to be so.’ ” Stewart, 243 Ga. at 583 , 255 S.E.2d at 702 , quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts §125, at | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Zareski
green
1 sentence2022The First District, in People v. Zareski, 2017 IL App (1st) 150836 , sought to articulate a workable standard for determining what constitutes “reasonable assistance” in the context of Illinois Supreme Court Rule 651 (eff. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert Novak
green
1 sentence1990Cir. 1984), 750 F.2d 970 , to formulate a workable test when he dissented from denial of certiorari in that case (Ollman v. Evans (1985), 471 U.S. 1127 , 86 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ollman v. Evans Et Al.
green
1 sentence1990Cir. 1984), 750 F.2d 970 , to formulate a workable test when he dissented from denial of certiorari in that case (Ollman v. Evans (1985), 471 U.S. 1127 , 86 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Williams v. United States
green
1 sentence1990Cir. 1984), 750 F.2d 970 , to formulate a workable test when he dissented from denial of certiorari in that case (Ollman v. Evans (1985), 471 U.S. 1127 , 86 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Fabian v. City of Miami
green
1 sentence1990Ed. 2d 278 , 105 S. Ct. 2662 ). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.