workable rule in Indiana

1984Accordingly, we hold that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile." Fyock, supra, 436 N.E.2d at 1091 -92 quoting New York v. Belton, (1981) 453 U.S. 454, 459-460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2863-2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 .

1984Accordingly, we hold that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile." Fyock, supra, 436 N.E.2d at 1091 -92 quoting New York v. Belton, (1981) 453 U.S. 454, 459-460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2863-2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 .

1976Brown v. United States (1973), 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 ; Harrington v .

1976Brown v. United States (1973), 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 ; Harrington v .

1984Accordingly, we hold that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile." Fyock, supra, 436 N.E.2d at 1091 -92 quoting New York v. Belton, (1981) 453 U.S. 454, 459-460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2863-2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 .

1984Accordingly, we hold that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile." Fyock, supra, 436 N.E.2d at 1091 -92 quoting New York v. Belton, (1981) 453 U.S. 454, 459-460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2863-2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 .

1980Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. Anderson, (1976) Ind.App., 357 N.E.2d 267 .

1978The exception to the general rule of non-liability for nonfeasance has arisen in certain cases in which the relationship of the parties is such as to impose a duty to act, e.g., a carrier to a passenger, Continental *487 Southern Lines, Inc. v. Robertson (1961), 241 Miss. 796 , 133 So.2d 543 ; an innkeeper to a guest, Stewart v. Weiner (1922), 108 Neb. 49 , 187 N.W. 121 ; a ship owner to a seaman, Harris v. Pennsylvania R.

1978The exception to the general rule of non-liability for nonfeasance has arisen in certain cases in which the relationship of the parties is such as to impose a duty to act, e.g., a carrier to a passenger, Continental *487 Southern Lines, Inc. v. Robertson (1961), 241 Miss. 796 , 133 So.2d 543 ; an innkeeper to a guest, Stewart v. Weiner (1922), 108 Neb. 49 , 187 N.W. 121 ; a ship owner to a seaman, Harris v. Pennsylvania R.

1978The exception to the general rule of non-liability for nonfeasance has arisen in certain cases in which the relationship of the parties is such as to impose a duty to act, e.g., a carrier to a passenger, Continental *487 Southern Lines, Inc. v. Robertson (1961), 241 Miss. 796 , 133 So.2d 543 ; an innkeeper to a guest, Stewart v. Weiner (1922), 108 Neb. 49 , 187 N.W. 121 ; a ship owner to a seaman, Harris v. Pennsylvania R.

1978The exception to the general rule of non-liability for nonfeasance has arisen in certain cases in which the relationship of the parties is such as to impose a duty to act, e.g., a carrier to a passenger, Continental *487 Southern Lines, Inc. v. Robertson (1961), 241 Miss. 796 , 133 So.2d 543 ; an innkeeper to a guest, Stewart v. Weiner (1922), 108 Neb. 49 , 187 N.W. 121 ; a ship owner to a seaman, Harris v. Pennsylvania R.

1976While appellate courts do not ordinarily have the original task of applying such a test, it is a familiar standard to all courts, and we believe its adoption will provide a more workable standard. ...” “ ‘When applying the federal harmless error standard, we must weigh the evidence against Larimer [appellant]— absent his confession — and determine whether, beyond a reasonable doubt, an honest and fair-minded jury would have rendered a guilty verdict based solely on the remaining untainted evidence.’ ” (Our emphasis.) 336 N.E.2d at 681 .

1970Review Board (1968), 143 Ind. App. 111 , 237 N. E. 2d 597 , 14 Ind. Dec. 469 , Rehearing Den., 238 N. E. 2d 472 , 14 Ind. Dec. 703 .

1970Review Board (1968), 143 Ind. App. 111 , 237 N. E. 2d 597 , 14 Ind. Dec. 469 , Rehearing Den., 238 N. E. 2d 472 , 14 Ind. Dec. 703 .

1970Review Board (1968), 143 Ind. App. 111 , 237 N. E. 2d 597 , 14 Ind. Dec. 469 , Rehearing Den., 238 N. E. 2d 472 , 14 Ind. Dec. 703 .

1969While appellate courts do not ordinarily have the original task of *30 applying such a test, it is a familiar standard to all courts, and we believe its adoption will provide a more workable standard...." 386 U.S. at 24 .