meaningful hearing (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

meaningful hearing in Arkansas

7 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicesgreen
ark · 2005 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016The court further finds that the adjudication order was not appealed. ■ In Jones v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Services, 361 Ark. 164, 190-91 , 205 S.W.3d 778, 794-95 (2005), we declined to address an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim in a termination-of-parental-rights proceeding.

2016The court further finds that the adjudication order was not appealed. ■ In Jones v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Services, 361 Ark. 164, 190-91 , 205 S.W.3d 778, 794-95 (2005), we declined to address an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim in a termination-of-parental-rights proceeding.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Arkansas Department of Human Services Crimes Against Children Division v. Steven D. Mitchell neutral
ark · 2021
1 sentence

2021Id.

12021–2021
Furnish v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
ark · 2017
1 sentence

2017We then vacated the court of appeals’ Cite as 2017 Ark. 240 opinion and remanded to that court for a full and meaningful analysis of the issues raised on appeal.

12017–2017
Taffner v. Arkansas Department of Human Services green
ark · 2016
2 sentences

2016Attorney for [Anita] . . . requesting that this court 8 Cite as 2016 Ark. 231 find that the adjudication hearing in this case was not a meaningful hearing is denied.

2016At the termination hearing, Chris again asserted that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not inform him of his right to appeal the adjudication order. 7 Cite as 2016 Ark. 231 In her oral argument to the circuit court, Anita asserted that she had received ineffective assistance of counsel, “the adjudication hearing was not a meaningful hearing, and was not advised of the right to appeal.” Chris joined in this argument asserting that he did not receive a meaningful hearing and received ineffective assistance of counsel.

12016–2016
Javed v. Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles green
alaska · 1996
1 sentence

2012Appellant suggests we look to Javed v. Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles, 921 P.2d 620 (Alaska 1996), for what constitutes a meaningful hearing under due process.

12012–2012
Crane v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1986
1 sentence

2005Specifically, Appellant argues that pursuant to Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986), he had the right to present a meaningful defense that included evidence of the physical and psychological environment surrounding his custodial confession.

12005–2005
Wessel v. Pryor green
ared · 1978
2 sentences

1979Wessel v. Pryor, 461 F.Supp. 1144 (E.D.Ark.1978); O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 , 95 S.Ct. 2486 , 45 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).

1979Wessel v. Pryor, 461 F. Supp. 1144 (Ed. Ark. 1978); O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975).

11979–1979
O'Connor v. Donaldson green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1979Wessel v. Pryor, 461 F.Supp. 1144 (E.D.Ark.1978); O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 , 95 S.Ct. 2486 , 45 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975).

1979Wessel v. Pryor, 461 F. Supp. 1144 (Ed. Ark. 1978); O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975).

11979–1979
Gerstein v. Pugh green
scotus · 1975
1 sentence

1979In Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), the Supreme Court struck down a Florida statute whicn allowed a person to be placed in jail without an opportunity for a probable cause determination.

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

TX 216 (1988–2026) CA 126 (1960–2026) NY 79 (1971–2026) IL 75 (1972–2026) PA 67 (1971–2026) WA 65 (1970–2025) NM 63 (1973–2026) OH 56 (1980–2026) LA 51 (1974–2025) WI 45 (1978–2026) MO 40 (1985–2025) FL 32 (1980–2026) WV 29 (1980–2026) CT 25 (1980–2026) UT 25 (2000–2025) TN 23 (1998–2024) MA 20 (1987–2025) ID 18 (1975–2025) KY 18 (1971–2025) DC 15 (1983–2022) NC 14 (1981–2025) IA 14 (1977–2023) MT 14 (1984–2024) MD 14 (1986–2023) GA 14 (1971–2025) CO 13 (1988–2025) MI 13 (1974–2026) KS 13 (1998–2024) MS 13 (1990–2023) WY 12 (1976–2020) AZ 11 (1982–2025) OK 11 (1976–2017) AK 10 (1981–2024) MN 10 (1987–2016) SC 10 (1992–2025) NJ 10 (1980–2021) AL 9 (1980–2025) HI 8 (1973–2023) IN 8 (1975–2019) ND 8 (1974–2014) OR 7 (1974–2010) AR 7 (1979–2021) RI 6 (1972–2018) NE 6 (1994–2025) NV 5 (1975–2022) DE 4 (1986–2024) SD 4 (1987–1995) VT 3 (2008–2025) NH 2 (2002–2010) VA 2 (2025–2025) VI 2 (2013–2015) ME 2 (2002–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check