7 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reavesgreen2 sentences1978See also State v. Reaves, 25 Or App 745 , 550 P2d 1403 , rev den (1976). 1978See also State v. Reaves, 25 Or App 745 , 550 P2d 1403 , rev den (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Michener
green
2 sentences1977United States v. Agurs, supra. In State v. Michener, 25 Or App 523 , 550 P2d 449 , Sup Ct review denied (1976), we held the trial court properly suppressed the results of a breathalyzer test because the defendant had demonstrated a meaningful analysis of the destroyed breathalyzer ampules was possible and a reasonable possibility that an error occurred in the initial administration of the test. 1977United States v. Agurs, supra. In State v. Michener, 25 Or App 523 , 550 P2d 449 , Sup Ct review denied (1976), we held the trial court properly suppressed the results of a breathalyzer test because the defendant had demonstrated a meaningful analysis of the destroyed breathalyzer ampules was possible and a reasonable possibility that an error occurred in the initial administration of the test. | 2 | 1977–1979 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
2 sentences2010E.g., Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US 254 , 90 S Ct 1011 , 25 L Ed 2d 287 (1970) (state cannot deprive a person of entitlement to welfare without notice and a prior hearing). 2010E.g., Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US 254 , 90 S Ct 1011 , 25 L Ed 2d 287 (1970) (state cannot deprive a person of entitlement to welfare without notice and a prior hearing). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Londoner v. City and County of Denver
green
1 sentence2007Londoner, 210 US at 386 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Gibford
green
2 sentences1980State v. Gibford, 40 Or App 77 , 594 P2d 858 (1979). 1980State v. Gibford, 40 Or App 77 , 594 P2d 858 (1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Eline's, Inc. v. Lakeside Laboratories, Inc.
green
1 sentence1974The District of Columbia Circuit Court, which originally formulated the “farce” test in Diggs v. Welch, 148 F2d 667 (DC Cir), cert denied 325 US 889 , *612 65 S Ct 1576 , 89 L Ed 2002 (1945), in 1970 held in Scott v. United States, 427 F2d 609, that the appropriate standard was whether “gross incompetence blotted ont the essence of a substantial defense.” 427 F2d at 610. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Noble v. Botkin
green
1 sentence1974The District of Columbia Circuit Court, which originally formulated the “farce” test in Diggs v. Welch, 148 F2d 667 (DC Cir), cert denied 325 US 889 , *612 65 S Ct 1576 , 89 L Ed 2002 (1945), in 1970 held in Scott v. United States, 427 F2d 609, that the appropriate standard was whether “gross incompetence blotted ont the essence of a substantial defense.” 427 F2d at 610. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Diggs v. Welch
green
1 sentence1974The District of Columbia Circuit Court, which originally formulated the “farce” test in Diggs v. Welch, 148 F2d 667 (DC Cir), cert denied 325 US 889 , *612 65 S Ct 1576 , 89 L Ed 2002 (1945), in 1970 held in Scott v. United States, 427 F2d 609, that the appropriate standard was whether “gross incompetence blotted ont the essence of a substantial defense.” 427 F2d at 610. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.