extensive analysis in Arizona

2025After an extensive analysis of the traffic laws, the court of appeals’ majority determined Shewey lacked reasonable suspicion because his interpretation of § 28-721(B) “cast too wide a net.” Alvarez-Soto, 258 Ariz. at 422 ¶ 21 (quoting Sweeney, 224 Ariz. at 107 ¶ 22).

2025After an extensive analysis of the traffic laws, the court of appeals’ majority determined Shewey lacked reasonable suspicion because his interpretation of § 28-721(B) “cast too wide a net.” Alvarez-Soto, 258 Ariz. at 422 ¶ 21 (quoting Sweeney, 224 Ariz. at 107 ¶ 22).

2018In cases which implicate "the law of all fifty states, '[t]he party seeking certification ... must ... provide an extensive analysis of state law variations to reveal whether these pose insuperable obstacles.' " Id. (alteration in Sacred Heart ) (quoting Cole v. Gen.

2018Motors Corp. , 484 F.3d 717 , 724 (5th Cir. 2007) ).

1985Beginning with Aldridge v. United States, 283 U.S. 308 , 51 S.Ct. 470 , 75 L.Ed. 1054 (1931), the United States Supreme Court has consistently held it is a violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights to refuse to question a jury panel about racial or religious prejudices when the circumstances require it.

1985Beginning with Aldridge v. United States, 283 U.S. 308 , 51 S.Ct. 470 , 75 L.Ed. 1054 (1931), the United States Supreme Court has consistently held it is a violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights to refuse to question a jury panel about racial or religious prejudices when the circumstances require it.

1983United States v. Topco Associates, Inc., supra; Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Company, 126 Ariz. 157 , 613 P.2d 620 (App.1980).

1983United States v. Topco Associates, Inc., supra; Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Company, 126 Ariz. 157 , 613 P.2d 620 (App.1980).

1974Appellant further argues that the requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 *204 (1969), were not met or, if they were met, that Sieling v. Eyman, 478 F.2d 211 (9th Cir. 1973), demands a more extensive inquiry into the issue of defendant’s ability to waive his constitutional rights upon entering a plea of guilty.

1974These issues were largely met by this court recently in State v. Ellison, Ariz., 526 P.2d 706 (1974).

1968"If an action is brought upon a cause of action, * * * which depends upon the continued existence of a statute, the action is not abated by the repeal and re-enactment of the statute pending the trial. * * *" 77 A.L.R.2d at 345 Other cases supporting the rule are Jessee v. De Shong (1907); Tex.Civ.App., 105 S.W. 1011 ; Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators and Adjusters, 201 Cal. App.2d 427 , 20 Cal. Rptr. 194 .

1968"If an action is brought upon a cause of action, * * * which depends upon the continued existence of a statute, the action is not abated by the repeal and re-enactment of the statute pending the trial. * * *" 77 A.L.R.2d at 345 Other cases supporting the rule are Jessee v. De Shong (1907); Tex.Civ.App., 105 S.W. 1011 ; Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators and Adjusters, 201 Cal. App.2d 427 , 20 Cal. Rptr. 194 .