Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1945–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lakeside Casino v. Bluegreen1 sentence2023The court found, “Ultimately, Krogman is arguing the Agency decision should be reversed based on the application of law to the facts, not because the Agency’s decision was taken without regard to the law or facts.” The court determined PERB had authority to 6 interpret the just cause standard.4 The court concluded it should determine whether PERB’s decision was “an irrational, illogical, or wholly unjustifiable application of law to the fact that has clearly been vested by a provision of law in the discretion of the agency,” citing Lakeside Casino v. Blue, 743 N.W.2d 169, 173 (Iowa 2007). | 1 | 1 |
City of Minot v. Bogergreen1 sentence2008See City of Minot v. Boger, 744 N.W.2d 277, 280-81 (N.D.2008) (listing the ordinance’s criteria and applying the requirements to facts distinguishable from those here). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lummusgreen1 sentence1991See Lummus, 449 N.W.2d at 96-99 (an extensive analysis traces the limits of due process in plea bargaining, including unilateral withdrawal by the prosecutor). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Combsgreen1 sentence1984Neither is there any express requirement in the rule for a “verbatim record.” Compare Iowa R.Crim.P. 8(3) (“A verbatim record of the proceedings at which the defendant enters a plea shall be made.”). 1 In State v. Combs, 316 N.W.2d 880, 883-84 (Iowa 1982), we held that rule 16(1) did not require an extensive inquiry by the court into the waiver. | 1 | 1 |
Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. Millergreen1 sentence1982An extensive analysis of the doctrine appears in Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Miller, 664 F.2d 899, 902 (2nd Cir. 1981) (footnote omitted): [Courts applying the fiduciary shield doctrine] have recognized that if an individual has contact with a particular state only by virtue of his acts as a fiduciary of the corporation, he may be shielded from the exercise, by that state, of jurisdiction over him personally on the basis of that conduct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.
green
2 sentences2009While the decision in IPO requires a more searching analysis than earlier Second Circuit precedent, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals also warned courts against engaging in such an extensive analysis of an expert’s credibility that it must make a decision on the merits of the case. 471 F.3d at 41 . 2009First, the amended rule removes . . . the provision that class certification “may be conditional.” Second, the amended rule replaces the provision . . . that a class certification decision be made “as soon as practicable” with a provision requiring the decision “at an early practicable time.” IPO, 471 F.3d at 39 . 14 against engaging in such an extensive analysis of an expert’s credibility that it must make a decision on the merits of the case. 471 F.3d at 41 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Siemer
green
1 sentence2024And because we defer to the district court’s determinations on prejudice displayed in voir dire, Siemer, 454 N.W.2d at 861 , we cannot say the court’s decision to grant the change of venue based on those observations and the information contained in the State’s motion was an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Jason
green
1 sentence2022He also claimed to be unaware that the well-established law in the State of Iowa is that the person representing himself pro se is held to the same standard of conduct as a lawyer. 6 Defendant Jason’s alleged lack of awareness of this standard is not quite accurate, as he went through an extensive waiver hearing in his previous Johnson County stalking case (Johnson County FECR078976; appeal decision 779 N.W.2d 66 (Iowa Court App. 2009)), at which time Judge Hibbs explained to him that he would be required to comply with the Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rules of Evidence just like a lawyer. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Rolfes
green
1 sentence1992In reaching this result, we do not agree with the appellant that our holding in this respect is contrary to our supreme court’s decision in Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman v. Rolfes, 454 N.W.2d 815 (Iowa 1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Lunde v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence1981Nor will we reiterate the extensive analysis of these sections found in Lunde, 299 N.W.2d at 475-79 , a decision filed after the trial in this ease. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.
green
2 sentences1945We think that the ruling of this court in the recent case of Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co., 232 Iowa 328 , 5 N. W. 2d 646 , is here controlling. 1945We think that the ruling of this court in the recent case of Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co., 232 Iowa 328 , 5 N. W. 2d 646 , is here controlling. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.