6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fletcher v. Stategreen2 sentences2023An extensive waiver hearing was then held in front of Superior Court Judge Karl S. Johnstone to determine whether Fletcher would be tried in 7 Fletcher v. State, 258 P.3d 874, 875 (Alaska App. 2011); W.M.F. v. State, 723 P.2d 1298, 1299 (Alaska App. 1986). –3– 2745 juvenile or adult court. 2023An extensive waiver hearing was then held in front of Superior Court Judge Karl S. Johnstone to determine whether Fletcher would be tried in 7 Fletcher v. State, 258 P.3d 874, 875 (Alaska App. 2011); W.M.F. v. State, 723 P.2d 1298, 1299 (Alaska App. 1986). –3– 2745 juvenile or adult court. | 2 | 2 |
WMF v. Stategreen2 sentences2023An extensive waiver hearing was then held in front of Superior Court Judge Karl S. Johnstone to determine whether Fletcher would be tried in 7 Fletcher v. State, 258 P.3d 874, 875 (Alaska App. 2011); W.M.F. v. State, 723 P.2d 1298, 1299 (Alaska App. 1986). –3– 2745 juvenile or adult court. 2023An extensive waiver hearing was then held in front of Superior Court Judge Karl S. Johnstone to determine whether Fletcher would be tried in 7 Fletcher v. State, 258 P.3d 874, 875 (Alaska App. 2011); W.M.F. v. State, 723 P.2d 1298, 1299 (Alaska App. 1986). –3– 2745 juvenile or adult court. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Abrahamgreen1 sentence1978NOTES [1] AS 12.55.120(b) provides: A sentence of imprisonment lawfully imposed by the superior court may be appealed to the supreme court by the state on the ground that the sentence is too lenient; however, when a sentence is appealed by the state and the defendant has not appealed the sentence, the court is not authorized to increase the sentence but may express its approval or disapproval of the sentence and its reasons in a written opinion. [2] State v. Abraham, 566 P.2d 267, 272 (Alaska 1977). [3] The date of that decision was June 8, 1977. [4] Crim.R. 35(a) provides: The court may corre | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Caldwellgreen1 sentence1975No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." [2] It is unknown to us whether either Schraff or Jones was ever tried or convicted on charges relating to marijuana found in the automobile. [3] See, e.g., Lowe v. Caldwell, 367 F. Supp. 46, 50-51 (S.D.Ga. 1973). [4] For an extensive analysis of the Lego decision see United States v. Watson, 469 F.2d 362 (5th Cir.1972). [5] See also Daygee v. State, 514 P.2d 1159, 1162 (Alaska 1973). [6] The state does not contend, n | 1 | 1 |
Daygee v. Stategreen2 sentences1975See also Daygee v. State, 514 P.2d 1159, 1162 (Alaska 1973). . 1975No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." [2] It is unknown to us whether either Schraff or Jones was ever tried or convicted on charges relating to marijuana found in the automobile. [3] See, e.g., Lowe v. Caldwell, 367 F. Supp. 46, 50-51 (S.D.Ga. 1973). [4] For an extensive analysis of the Lego decision see United States v. Watson, 469 F.2d 362 (5th Cir.1972). [5] See also Daygee v. State, 514 P.2d 1159, 1162 (Alaska 1973). [6] The state does not contend, n | 1 | 1 |
Karalexis v. Byrnegreen1 sentence1970However, as Chief Judge Aldrich, writing for a three-judge district court panel, said in Karalexis v. Byrne, 306 F.Supp. 1363, 1365, n. 4 (D.Mass.1969): “The Superior Court’s extensive analysis * * ⅜ of a decade of the Supreme Court’s views, reaching the conclusion that there is no majority agreement on any one approach to obscenity, apart from the fact that it disregards such an agreement in Stanley [v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 , 89 S.Ct. 1243 , 22 L.Ed.2d 542 ] overlooks the fact that if only four, or even three, justices agree on one method by which immunity is reached, this agreement is as si | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stephenson v. Superior Court of State of Alaska
green
1 sentence1988Stephenson, 697 P.2d at 655-57 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
United States v. Charles David Watson
green
2 sentences1975For an extensive analysis of the Lego decision see United States v. Watson, 469 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1972). . 1975No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." [2] It is unknown to us whether either Schraff or Jones was ever tried or convicted on charges relating to marijuana found in the automobile. [3] See, e.g., Lowe v. Caldwell, 367 F. Supp. 46, 50-51 (S.D.Ga. 1973). [4] For an extensive analysis of the Lego decision see United States v. Watson, 469 F.2d 362 (5th Cir.1972). [5] See also Daygee v. State, 514 P.2d 1159, 1162 (Alaska 1973). [6] The state does not contend, n | 1 | 1975–1975 |
United States v. Ingelow Odell Sells and Howard Michael Jefferies
green
1 sentence1975In United States v. Sells, 496 F.2d 912 (7th Cir.1974) the court noted: "In United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974), the Court said that when the government seeks to justify a warrantless search by showing voluntary consent, it may do so by showing that `permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effect sought to be inspected.' Id. at 993. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
United States v. Matlock
green
2 sentences1975In United States v. Sells, 496 F.2d 912 (7th Cir.1974) the court noted: "In United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974), the Court said that when the government seeks to justify a warrantless search by showing voluntary consent, it may do so by showing that `permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effect sought to be inspected.' Id. at 993. 1975In United States v. Sells, 496 F.2d 912 (7th Cir.1974) the court noted: "In United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974), the Court said that when the government seeks to justify a warrantless search by showing voluntary consent, it may do so by showing that `permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effect sought to be inspected.' Id. at 993. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Stanley v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1970However, as Chief Judge Aldrich, writing for a three-judge district court panel, said in Karalexis v. Byrne, 306 F.Supp. 1363, 1365, n. 4 (D.Mass.1969): “The Superior Court’s extensive analysis * * ⅜ of a decade of the Supreme Court’s views, reaching the conclusion that there is no majority agreement on any one approach to obscenity, apart from the fact that it disregards such an agreement in Stanley [v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 , 89 S.Ct. 1243 , 22 L.Ed.2d 542 ] overlooks the fact that if only four, or even three, justices agree on one method by which immunity is reached, this agreement is as si 1970However, as Chief Judge Aldrich, writing for a three-judge district court panel, said in Karalexis v. Byrne, 306 F.Supp. 1363, 1365, n. 4 (D.Mass.1969): “The Superior Court’s extensive analysis * * ⅜ of a decade of the Supreme Court’s views, reaching the conclusion that there is no majority agreement on any one approach to obscenity, apart from the fact that it disregards such an agreement in Stanley [v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 , 89 S.Ct. 1243 , 22 L.Ed.2d 542 ] overlooks the fact that if only four, or even three, justices agree on one method by which immunity is reached, this agreement is as si | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.