7 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thrall v. St. Luke's Regional Medical Centergreen2 sentences2019See Thrall , 157 Idaho at 947-48 , 342 P.3d at 659 -60 . 2019See Thrall , 157 Idaho at 947-48 , 342 P.3d at 659 -60 . | 2 | 2 |
H.F.L.P., LLC v. City of Twin Fallsgreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., H.F.L.P., LLC v. City of Twin Falls, 157 Idaho 672 , 682–683, 339 P.3d 557 , 567–68 (2014). 2026See, e.g., H.F.L.P., LLC v. City of Twin Falls, 157 Idaho 672 , 682–683, 339 P.3d 557 , 567–68 (2014). | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. City of Pocatellogreen2 sentences2019See Anderson, 112 Idaho at 184–85, 731 P.2d at 179–80; Gusman, 125 Idaho at 808–09, 874 P.2d at 1115–16. 2019See Anderson, 112 Idaho at 184–85, 731 P.2d at 179–80; Gusman, 125 Idaho at 808–09, 874 P.2d at 1115–16. | 1 | 1 |
Radke v. County of Freeborngreen2 sentences2006In Radke the court applied a fact-intensive test when determining the agency charged with investigating reported child abuse owed a duty to a child who was beaten to death by his mother’s boyfriend. 694 N.W.2d at 794, 796-97 . 2006There, the court noted under Minnesota law a statute alone could not create a special duty; rather there must be additional indicia the governmental unit “has undertaken the responsibility of protecting a particular class of persons[] from the risks associated with a particular harm.” Id. at 793 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vidal v. American General Companies
green
1 sentence2023For example, in Vidal, the court required the insurer to provide evidence that its conduct had not waived or relinquished its subrogation rights, and only then could it assert prejudice as a defense against the insured’s claims. 785 P.2d at 235 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Intermountain Eye & Laser Centers, P.L.L.C. v. Miller
green
2 sentences2022Relying on Intermountain Eye and Laser Centers, P.L.L.C. v Miller, 142 Idaho 218 , 127 P.3d 121 (2005), the Spine Institute argues that the non-compete provision did not prevent Blaskiewicz from practicing all medicine because he could have simply paid the liquidated damages amount set forth in the PSA. 2022Relying on Intermountain Eye and Laser Centers, P.L.L.C. v Miller, 142 Idaho 218 , 127 P.3d 121 (2005), the Spine Institute argues that the non-compete provision did not prevent Blaskiewicz from practicing all medicine because he could have simply paid the liquidated damages amount set forth in the PSA. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Gusman
green
2 sentences2019See Anderson, 112 Idaho at 184–85, 731 P.2d at 179–80; Gusman, 125 Idaho at 808–09, 874 P.2d at 1115–16. 2019See Anderson, 112 Idaho at 184–85, 731 P.2d at 179–80; Gusman, 125 Idaho at 808–09, 874 P.2d at 1115–16. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.