Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Griergreen2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wn. 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Griergreen2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Torresgreen2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Griergreen2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pittman
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Ward
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Ward
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Pittman
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). 2010See State v. Grier, 150 Wash.App. 619 , 208 P.3d 1221 (2009), review granted, 167 Wash.2d 1017 , 224 P.3d 773 (2010); State v. Pittman, 134 Wash.App. 376 , 166 P.3d 720 ; State v. Ward, 125 Wash.App. 243 , 104 P.3d 670 (2004). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Kuehn v. Renton School District No. 403
green
2 sentences2008And, in Kuehn v. Renton School District No. 403, 103 Wn.2d 594 , 694 P.2d 1078 (1985), although we disallowed suspicionless searches of the personal luggage of student band members, we held that such searches would be permissible based on a reasonable belief of wrongdoing. ¶41 Thus, we have recognized the school setting requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit activity needed to justify a search based upon the “special needs” in this environment. 2008And, in Kuehn v. Renton School District No. 403, 103 Wn.2d 594 , 694 P.2d 1078 (1985), although we disallowed suspicionless searches of the personal luggage of student band members, we held that such searches would be permissible based on a reasonable belief of wrongdoing. ¶41 Thus, we have recognized the school setting requires some modification of the level of suspicion of illicit activity needed to justify a search based upon the “special needs” in this environment. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Cienfuegos
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Salavea
green
1 sentence2024In the context of juvenile jurisdiction, we have held that prejudice exists when preaccusatorial delay “results in a decrease of benefits available to a defendant.” Salavea, 151 Wn.2d at 139 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Workman
green
2 sentences2023We recognize that a trial court’s decision to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense involves a fact-intensive analysis pursuant to the two-pronged test of State v. Workman, 90 Wn.2d 443 , 584 P.2d 382 (1978). 2023We recognize that a trial court’s decision to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense involves a fact-intensive analysis pursuant to the two-pronged test of State v. Workman, 90 Wn.2d 443 , 584 P.2d 382 (1978). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Diamond v. Cross
green
1 sentence2017In re Cross, 99 Wn.2d at 377 . 1 In Hart, our Supreme Court declined to adopt the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to mootness, noting that “[e]ven if we were to adopt this exception to the general rule against issuing decisions in moot cases, such an exception would not be proper here.” 111 Wn.2d at 451 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hart v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS.
green
1 sentence2017In re Cross, 99 Wn.2d at 377 . 1 In Hart, our Supreme Court declined to adopt the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to mootness, noting that “[e]ven if we were to adopt this exception to the general rule against issuing decisions in moot cases, such an exception would not be proper here.” 111 Wn.2d at 451 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Gillaspie
green
1 sentence2008App. 560, 562 , 507 P.2d 1223 (1973). ¶41 The courts below recognized a stepparent’s loco parentis status generally presents a question of fact but considered a fact-intensive inquiry inappropriate in the context of deciding the applicability of parental immunity. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.