7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Summers v. State
green
2 sentences1979We do not necessarily limit the determinative factors to those stated above but we suggest them only as guidelines, any one of which might be determinative of the propriety for waiver in a given case.” [Citations omitted.] Summers v. State, supra, 248 Ind. 551 , 230 N.E.2d 320, 325-26 . 1979We do not necessarily limit the determinative factors to those stated above but we suggest them only as guidelines, any one of which might be determinative of the propriety for waiver in a given case.” [Citations omitted.] Summers v. State, supra, 248 Ind. 551 , 230 N.E.2d 320, 325-26 . | 2 | 1976–1979 |
Smith v. Tisdal
green
1 sentence2010Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Our courts have identified the determinative inquiry in such cases: "If one has engaged in affirmative conduct evidence-ing an undertaking to provide a [service], the failure to [provide the service}, otherwise an 'omission,' will nonetheless support Hability for the breach of a gratuitously assumed duty." Ember, supra, 490 N.E.2d at 771 . 1994Our courts have identified the determinative inquiry in such cases: "If one has engaged in affirmative conduct evidence-ing an undertaking to provide a [service], the failure to [provide the service}, otherwise an 'omission,' will nonetheless support Hability for the breach of a gratuitously assumed duty." Ember, supra, 490 N.E.2d at 771 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hansen v. Von Duprin, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989The issue ... is simply whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. # * * %* # # The nature of the injury, including an aggravation or triggering of a pre-exist-ing injury, must be such that injury or aggravation is shown to 'arise out of and in the course of employment,' that is, to be causally connected with the employment." Hansen v. Von Duprin, Inc. (1987), Ind., 507 N.E.2d 573, 576 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
McFarland v. State
green
2 sentences1978McFarland v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 657 , 336 N.E.2d 824 . 1978McFarland v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 657 , 336 N.E.2d 824 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Jump
green
2 sentences1976See also: State v. Jump (1974), 160 Ind. App. 1 , 309 N.E.2d 148 . 1976See also: State v. Jump (1974), 160 Ind. App. 1 , 309 N.E.2d 148 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Kent v. United States
green
2 sentences1975Kent v. United States, supra.” (Our emphasis.) Five years later, in Atkins et al. v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 596 , 290 N.E.2d 441 , our Supreme Court clarified the standards established in Summers . 1975Kent v. United States, supra . " (Our emphasis.) Five years later, in Atkins et al. v. State (1972), Ind., 290 N.E.2d 441 , our Supreme Court clarified the standards established in Summers . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Atkins v. State
green
2 sentences1975Kent v. United States, supra.” (Our emphasis.) Five years later, in Atkins et al. v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 596 , 290 N.E.2d 441 , our Supreme Court clarified the standards established in Summers . 1975Kent v. United States, supra.” (Our emphasis.) Five years later, in Atkins et al. v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 596 , 290 N.E.2d 441 , our Supreme Court clarified the standards established in Summers . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.