7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hutchinsgreen2 sentences1991Id. at 197 , 337 S.E.2d at 522 (quoting State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 345 , 279 S.E.2d 788, 803 (1981)). 1991Id. at 197 , 337 S.E.2d at 522 (quoting State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 345 , 279 S.E.2d 788, 803 (1981)). | 1 | 1 |
Weil v. . Woodardgreen2 sentences1977In Weil v. Woodard, 104 N.C. 94, 97 , 10 S.E. 129, 130 (1889), the court set forth the standard of review for an appellate court when a judgment is set aside in a trial court pursuant to former G.S. 1-220 (now G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b)(1)): [I]f the facts so found in any such case, in any reasonable view of them, constitute such “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” and if the judge grants the motion, in the exercise of his sound discretion, this Court has no authority to reverse or disturb his action, because the statute makes the discretion his. 1977In Weil v. Woodard, 104 N.C. 94, 97 , 10 S.E. 129, 130 (1889), the court set forth the standard of review for an appellate court when a judgment is set aside in a trial court pursuant to former G.S. 1-220 (now G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b)(1)): [I]f the facts so found in any such case, in any reasonable view of them, constitute such “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” and if the judge grants the motion, in the exercise of his sound discretion, this Court has no authority to reverse or disturb his action, because the statute makes the discretion his. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lehr v. Robertson
green
2 sentences2001Lehr, 463 U.S. 248 , 77 L. 2001Lehr, 463 U.S. 248 , 77 L. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. . Harris
green
2 sentences1998In State v. Harris, 216 N.C. 746 , 6 S.E.2d 854 (1940), this Court set forth the standard for legislative delegation of authority as follows: In licensing those who desire to engage in professions or occupations as may be proper subjects of such regulation, the Legislature may confer upon executive officers or bodies the power of granting or refusing to license persons to enter such trades or professions only when it has prescribed a sufficient standard for their guidance.... 1998In State v. Harris, 216 N.C. 746 , 6 S.E.2d 854 (1940), this Court set forth the standard for legislative delegation of authority as follows: In licensing those who desire to engage in professions or occupations as may be proper subjects of such regulation, the Legislature may confer upon executive officers or bodies the power of granting or refusing to license persons to enter such trades or professions only when it has prescribed a sufficient standard for their guidance.... | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Fields
green
2 sentences1991Id. at 197 , 337 S.E.2d at 522 (quoting State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 345 , 279 S.E.2d 788, 803 (1981)). 1991Id. at 197 , 337 S.E.2d at 522 (quoting State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 345 , 279 S.E.2d 788, 803 (1981)). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. McDougald
neutral
2 sentences1982This Court set forth the test of defendant's motion in State v. McDougald, 38 N.C.App. 244, 248 , 248 S.E.2d 72, 77-78 , disc. rev. denied, 296 N.C. 413 , 251 S.E.2d 472 (1979): The burden of proof in a hearing on a motion for change of venue is upon the defendant. 1982This Court set forth the test of defendant's motion in State v. McDougald, 38 N.C.App. 244, 248 , 248 S.E.2d 72, 77-78 , disc. rev. denied, 296 N.C. 413 , 251 S.E.2d 472 (1979): The burden of proof in a hearing on a motion for change of venue is upon the defendant. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. McDougald
green
2 sentences1982This Court set forth the test of defendant's motion in State v. McDougald, 38 N.C.App. 244, 248 , 248 S.E.2d 72, 77-78 , disc. rev. denied, 296 N.C. 413 , 251 S.E.2d 472 (1979): The burden of proof in a hearing on a motion for change of venue is upon the defendant. 1982This Court set forth the test of defendant's motion in State v. McDougald, 38 N.C.App. 244, 248 , 248 S.E.2d 72, 77-78 , disc. rev. denied, 296 N.C. 413 , 251 S.E.2d 472 (1979): The burden of proof in a hearing on a motion for change of venue is upon the defendant. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Henderson
green
2 sentences1977In State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 (1974), this Court set forth the standard as follows: “. . . 1977In State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 (1974), this Court set forth the standard as follows: “. . . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Simmons v. Morton
green
1 sentence1970App. 308 , 161 S.E. 2d 222 (1968), this Court set forth the standard to be used in proving agency as follows: “ ‘The plaintiff has the burden of proving that a particular person was at the time acting as a servant or agent of the defendant. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.