Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lowmangreen2 sentences2021“Assignments of error on direct appeal regarding ineffective assistance of trial counsel must specifically allege deficient performance.” State v. Lowman, 308 Neb. 482, 497 , 954 N.W.2d 905, 919 (2021). 2021“Assignments of error on direct appeal regarding ineffective assistance of trial counsel must specifically allege deficient performance.” State v. Lowman, 308 Neb. 482, 497 , 954 N.W.2d 905, 919 (2021). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pribilgreen2 sentences2008Thus, the jury instruction given by the district court was a correct statement of the law, and by giving the pattern jury instruction definition of "reckless," the district court avoided using "the horrendously complicated definition of the term `recklessly' contained in § 28-109(19)." See State v. Pribil, 224 Neb. 28, 32 , 395 N.W.2d 543, 547 (1986). 2008Thus, the jury instruction given by the district court was a correct statement of the law, and by giving the pattern jury instruction definition of "reckless," the district court avoided using "the horrendously complicated definition of the term `recklessly' contained in § 28-109(19)." See State v. Pribil, 224 Neb. 28, 32 , 395 N.W.2d 543, 547 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pruettgreen2 sentences2008But see State v. Pruett, 263 Neb. 99 , 638 N.W.2d 809 (2002) (Nebraska Supreme Court noted that trial court's instructing jury using statutory definition of "recklessly" was proper). 2008But see State v. Pruett, 263 Neb. 99 , 638 N.W.2d 809 (2002) (Nebraska Supreme Court noted that trial court's instructing jury using statutory definition of "recklessly" was proper). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Huerta
green
2 sentences2018We agree with Huerta’s basic contention - 183 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports STATE v. HUERTA Cite as 26 Neb. 2018We agree with Huerta’s basic contention - 183 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports STATE v. HUERTA Cite as 26 Neb. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Valentine
green
2 sentences2020In State v. Valentine, 27 Neb. 2020State v. Valentine, 27 Neb. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Rothenberger
green
2 sentences2019State v. Rothenberger, 294 Neb. 810 , 885 N.W.2d 23 (2016). [16] Here, the district court used a pattern jury instruction regarding the jury’s evaluation of the credibility of an expert witness. 2019State v. Rothenberger, 294 Neb. 810 , 885 N.W.2d 23 (2016). [16] Here, the district court used a pattern jury instruction regarding the jury’s evaluation of the credibility of an expert witness. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Thorpe
green
2 sentences2013Whenever an applicable instruction may be taken from the Nebraska Jury Instructions, that instruction is the one which 30 Brief for appellant at 37. 31 State v. Robinson, 272 Neb. 582 , 724 N.W.2d 35 (2006), abrogated on other grounds, State v. Thorpe, 280 Neb. 11 , 783 N.W.2d 749 (2010). 32 Brief for appellant at 35. 2013Whenever an applicable instruction may be taken from the Nebraska Jury Instructions, that instruction is the one which 30 Brief for appellant at 37. 31 State v. Robinson, 272 Neb. 582 , 724 N.W.2d 35 (2006), abrogated on other grounds, State v. Thorpe, 280 Neb. 11 , 783 N.W.2d 749 (2010). 32 Brief for appellant at 35. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2013Whenever an applicable instruction may be taken from the Nebraska Jury Instructions, that instruction is the one which 30 Brief for appellant at 37. 31 State v. Robinson, 272 Neb. 582 , 724 N.W.2d 35 (2006), abrogated on other grounds, State v. Thorpe, 280 Neb. 11 , 783 N.W.2d 749 (2010). 32 Brief for appellant at 35. 2013Whenever an applicable instruction may be taken from the Nebraska Jury Instructions, that instruction is the one which 30 Brief for appellant at 37. 31 State v. Robinson, 272 Neb. 582 , 724 N.W.2d 35 (2006), abrogated on other grounds, State v. Thorpe, 280 Neb. 11 , 783 N.W.2d 749 (2010). 32 Brief for appellant at 35. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.