53 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barnett v. Sethigreen2 sentences2010Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). 2010Malpractice The supreme court explained the plaintiffs burden of proof in a legal malpractice claim in Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146, pp. 9-10 (La.1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138: To establish a claim for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove: 1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; 2) negligent representation by the attorney; and 3) loss caused by that negligence. 112 Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). | 3 | 3 |
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co.green2 sentences2022MB Indus., 74 So.3d at 1187 . 2012See MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Company, 74 So.3d at 1182-1183 . 3 As such, rather than considering defendant’s argument under principles of equitable estoppel to determine whether the defendant was entitled to summary judgment herein as a matter of law, we must consider whether Brassette waived her right to pursue a legal malpractice claim against the defendant by entering into a settlement agreement with the FDA. | 2 | 4 |
Braud v. New England Ins. Co.green2 sentences2009Hendrick v. ABC Insurance Company, 2000-2403, 2000-2349, p. 9 (La.5/15/01), 787 So.2d 283, 289 ; Brand v. New England Insurance Company, 576 So.2d 466, 468 (La.1991). 1998The supreme court explained in Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., 593 So.2d 351 (La. 1992), and Braud v. New England Insurance Company, 576 So.2d 466 (La.1991), that the cause of action for malpractice arises when any appreciable and actual harm flows from the negligent conduct. | 2 | 3 |
Rodriguez v. Traylorgreen2 sentences2025The Third Circuit Court of Appeal reversed, finding that, based on the holdings of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Traylor, 468 So.2d 1186, 1188 (La. 1995 (holding that “the wealth or poverty of a party to a lawsuit is not a proper consideration in the determination of compensatory damages”) and Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146 (La. 1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138 (holding that “[a] plaintiff can have no greater rights against attorneys for the negligent handling of a claim than are available in the underlying claim”), collectability is not an issue properly considered in a legal malpracti 2025The Third Circuit Court of Appeal reversed, finding that, based on the holdings of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Traylor, 468 So.2d 1186, 1188 (La. 1995 (holding that “the wealth or poverty of a party to a lawsuit is not a proper consideration in the determination of compensatory damages”) and Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146 (La. 1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138 (holding that “[a] plaintiff can have no greater rights against attorneys for the negligent handling of a claim than are available in the underlying claim”), collectability is not an issue properly considered in a legal malpracti | 2 | 2 |
Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Piersongreen2 sentences1987APPLICABLE PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD This court, sitting EN BANC, has previously considered the applicable prescriptive period of a legal malpractice action in Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson, 428 So.2d 995, 999 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983), writ *230 denied, 431 So.2d 773 (La.1983). 1985See Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson, supra; Sturm v. Zelden & Zelden, 445 So.2d 32 (La.App. 4th Cir.1984); and Knighten v. Knighten, 447 So.2d 534 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1984). | 2 | 2 |
Finkelstein v. Colliergreen2 sentences2010Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). 2010Malpractice The supreme court explained the plaintiffs burden of proof in a legal malpractice claim in Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146, pp. 9-10 (La.1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138: To establish a claim for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove: 1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; 2) negligent representation by the attorney; and 3) loss caused by that negligence. 112 Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). | 1 | 3 |
Murphy v. Gilsbar, Inc.green2 sentences2012See Murphy v. Gilsbar, 834 So.2d at 672 . 2010In Murphy v. Gilsbar, Inc., 02-205 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/31/02) , 834 So.2d 669 , writ denied, 03-676 (La.5/30/03), 845 So.2d 1057 , the first circuit applied the concept of equitable estoppel in ruling that a client could not bring a legal malpractice claim against her attorney. | 1 | 2 |
Brassette v. Exniciosgreen1 sentence2016See MB Industries, 11-0303, p. 13, 74 So.3d 1173, 1183 ; Saussy v. Bonin, 12-1755, pp. 5-6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/4/13), 125 So.3d 1, 5 ; see also Brassette v. Exnicios, 11-1439, pp. 4-5 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/14/12), 92 So.3d 1077, 1080 . | 1 | 1 |
Land v. Vidrinegreen1 sentence2012See Land v. Vidrine, 10-1342, pp. 9-10 (La.3/15/11), 62 So.3d 36, 42 . | 1 | 1 |
| Merrill v. Theardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Thurston v. Continental Casualty Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Succession of Zataraingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ault v. Bradleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Costello v. Hardy
green
2 sentences2025The Third Circuit Court of Appeal reversed, finding that, based on the holdings of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Traylor, 468 So.2d 1186, 1188 (La. 1995 (holding that “the wealth or poverty of a party to a lawsuit is not a proper consideration in the determination of compensatory damages”) and Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146 (La. 1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138 (holding that “[a] plaintiff can have no greater rights against attorneys for the negligent handling of a claim than are available in the underlying claim”), collectability is not an issue properly considered in a legal malpracti 2025The Third Circuit Court of Appeal reversed, finding that, based on the holdings of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Traylor, 468 So.2d 1186, 1188 (La. 1995 (holding that “the wealth or poverty of a party to a lawsuit is not a proper consideration in the determination of compensatory damages”) and Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146 (La. 1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138 (holding that “[a] plaintiff can have no greater rights against attorneys for the negligent handling of a claim than are available in the underlying claim”), collectability is not an issue properly considered in a legal malpracti | 9 | 2007–2025 |
Reeder v. North
green
2 sentences2012Naghi , 08-2527 at 5, 17 So.3d at 922 ; Teague, 07-1384 at 11, 974 So.2d at 1274 ; Reeder , 97-0239 at 5-6, 701 So.2d at 1295 . *625 In Reeder v. North, the court of appeal held while the attorney-client relationship is in existence and the attorney is actively attempting to remedy the alleged malpractice until the judgment giving rise to the malpractice claim becomes definitive, a legal malpractice claim does not ripen into a cause of action and prescription or peremption does not begin to run. 96-165, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96); 683 So.2d 912, 916 . 2011Id. at 502-04 . [13] Merrill v. Theard, 187 La. 55 , 174 So. 107, 108 (1937); Distefano v. B & P Constr., Inc. 04-25 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/26/04) , 874 So.2d 407, 411 . [14] In Reeder v. North, 97-239 (La. 10/21/97), 701 So.2d 1291 , this Court held that a pending appeal does not toll the expiration of the statutory peremptive period for a legal malpractice claim. | 5 | 2002–2013 |
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company
green
2 sentences2024Id. at 634-35 . 2023R.S. 9:5605(E), a legal malpractice claim is governed by the one-year prescriptive period.” Lomont, 2014-2483, p. 24, 172 So.3d at 636 . | 4 | 2022–2024 |
Reeder v. North
neutral
2 sentences2012Naghi , 08-2527 at 5, 17 So.3d at 922 ; Teague, 07-1384 at 11, 974 So.2d at 1274 ; Reeder , 97-0239 at 5-6, 701 So.2d at 1295 . *625 In Reeder v. North, the court of appeal held while the attorney-client relationship is in existence and the attorney is actively attempting to remedy the alleged malpractice until the judgment giving rise to the malpractice claim becomes definitive, a legal malpractice claim does not ripen into a cause of action and prescription or peremption does not begin to run. 96-165, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96); 683 So.2d 912, 916 . 2012In Reeder v. North, the court of appeal held while the attorney-client relationship is in existence and the attorney is actively attempting to remedy the alleged malpractice until the judgment giving rise to the malpractice claim becomes definitive, a legal malpractice claim does not ripen into a cause of action l^and prescription or per-emption does not begin to run. 96-165, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96); 683 So.2d 912, 916 . | 4 | 1997–2012 |
Lima v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences2012This Court also applied the continuous representation rule in Lima to suspend the commencement of the one-year prescriptive period on the plaintiffs' legal malpractice claim while the attorney continued to represent them. 595 So.2d at 629-30 . 2012This Court also applied the continuous representation rule in Lima to suspend the commencement of the one-year prescriptive period on the plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim while the attorney continued to represent them. 595 So.2d at 629-30 . | 3 | 1998–2012 |
Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2022The central issue was “whether the client, after proving the attorneys’ negligence, must also establish the validity of the underlying claim by proving that the attorneys’ negligence caused him damages and by further proving the amount of the damages.” Id. at 1110 . 1993Co., 422 So.2d 1109 (La.1982), holds that in a legal malpractice claim, where the plaintiff proves the defendant's negligence in allowing a claim to prescribe, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove the plaintiff would not have prevailed on the merits. | 2 | 1993–2022 |
Jenkins v. Starns
green
2 sentences2015More recently, the Supreme Court in Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.1/24/12), 85 So.3d 612 , summarized its holding in Teag-ue as follows: Applying Campo to a legal malpractice claim, the [Teague ] Court held per-emption commences to run in a legal malpractice case when a claimant knew or should have known of the existence of facts that would have enabled him to state a cause of action for legal malpractice. 2013As noted by the court in Jenkins, 85 So.3d at 620-21 , in the context of a legal malpractice claim, the “date of discovery” from which prescription or peremption begins to run is the date on which a reasonable man in the position of the plaintiff has, or should have, either actual or constructive knowledge of the damage, the delict, and the relationship between them sufficient to indicate to a reasonable person that he is the victim of a tort and to state a cause of action against the defendant. | 2 | 2013–2015 |
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2012Hendrick v. ABC Insurance Co., 00-2054 (La.5/15/01); 787 So.2d 283 ; Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So.2d 624 (La. 1992). 2012In Hendrick, the issue before this Court was again whether contra non valentem applies to suspend liberative prescription. 00-2403 at 8, 787 So.2d at 289 . | 2 | 2009–2012 |
Barnett v. Sethi
neutral
2 sentences2010Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). 2010Malpractice The supreme court explained the plaintiffs burden of proof in a legal malpractice claim in Costello v. Hardy, 03-1146, pp. 9-10 (La.1/21/04), 864 So.2d 129 , 138: To establish a claim for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove: 1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; 2) negligent representation by the attorney; and 3) loss caused by that negligence. 112 Finkelstein v. Collier, 636 So.2d 1053, 1058 (La.App. 5 Cir.1994); Barnett v. Sethi, 608 So.2d 1011, 1014 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied, 613 So.2d 993 , 994 (La.1993). | 2 | 1999–2010 |
Francois v. Reed
green
2 sentences2000Francois v. Reed, 97-1328, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/15/98), 714 So.2d 228, 229-230 . 2000Francois v. Reed, 97-1328, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/15/98), 714 So.2d 228, 229-230 ; Prestage v. Clark, 97-0524, p. 9 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/28/98), 723 So.2d 1086, 1091 , writ denied, 99-0234 (La.3/26/99), 739 So.2d 800 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
In re Booth
green
1 sentence2018The committee also determined that the baseline sanction is suspension based *1214 on the case of In re: Bullock , 16-0075 (La. 3/24/16), 187 So.3d 986 , wherein an attorney was suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, with all but six months deferred, for neglecting her client's legal matter to the point that the claim prescribed, failing to communicate with her client and timely disclose her malpractice, and misleading her client regarding the status of the case. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Saussy v. Bonin
green
1 sentence2016See MB Industries, 11-0303, p. 13, 74 So.3d 1173, 1183 ; Saussy v. Bonin, 12-1755, pp. 5-6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/4/13), 125 So.3d 1, 5 ; see also Brassette v. Exnicios, 11-1439, pp. 4-5 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/14/12), 92 So.3d 1077, 1080 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Luther v. Iom Co.
green
1 sentence2016Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Mr. Lewis, as the nonmoving party, see Luther v. IOM Co. LLC, 13-0353, p. 5 (La.10/15/13), 130 So.3d 817, 822 , we find that defendants made a prima facie showing that there was an absence of factual support for an essential element of the legal malpractice claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC)
green
1 sentence2015Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC), 47,763 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/13), 114 So.3d 529 , writ denied, 13-1643 (La.11/8/13), 125 So.3d 452 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC)
neutral
1 sentence2015Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC), 47,763 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/13), 114 So.3d 529 , writ denied, 13-1643 (La.11/8/13), 125 So.3d 452 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Miralda v. Gonzalez
green
1 sentence2015This Court in Miralda v. Gonzalez, 14-0888 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/4/15) , 160 So.3d 998, 1017 , recently summarized the governing principles regarding the timeliness of a legal malpractice claim as follows: The timeliness of a legal malpractice claim is measured by La. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
B. Swirsky & Co., Inc. v. Bott
green
1 sentence2014Swirksy & Co., Inc. v. Bott, 598 So.2d 1281 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992), a client filed a legal malpractice claim and breach of contract action against his former counsel, counsel’s law firm, and malpractice insurer for the attorney’s failure to file proof of loss claims forms with the client’s insurer relative to the client’s casualty loss by fire. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Lirette v. Roe
green
1 sentence2013Id., p. 2, 631 So.2d at 505 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Naghi v. Brener
green
1 sentence2012Naghi , 08-2527 at 5, 17 So.3d at 922 ; Teague, 07-1384 at 11, 974 So.2d at 1274 ; Reeder , 97-0239 at 5-6, 701 So.2d at 1295 . *625 In Reeder v. North, the court of appeal held while the attorney-client relationship is in existence and the attorney is actively attempting to remedy the alleged malpractice until the judgment giving rise to the malpractice claim becomes definitive, a legal malpractice claim does not ripen into a cause of action and prescription or peremption does not begin to run. 96-165, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96); 683 So.2d 912, 916 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2012Naghi , 08-2527 at 5, 17 So.3d at 922 ; Teague, 07-1384 at 11, 974 So.2d at 1274 ; Reeder , 97-0239 at 5-6, 701 So.2d at 1295 . *625 In Reeder v. North, the court of appeal held while the attorney-client relationship is in existence and the attorney is actively attempting to remedy the alleged malpractice until the judgment giving rise to the malpractice claim becomes definitive, a legal malpractice claim does not ripen into a cause of action and prescription or peremption does not begin to run. 96-165, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96); 683 So.2d 912, 916 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Distefano v. B & P CONST., INC. neutral | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| American Reliable Insurance v. Navratil green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Eastman v. Flor-Ohio, Ltd. green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Dark v. Marshall
green
1 sentence2011In Dark v. Marshall, 41,711 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/13/06), 945 So.2d 246 , the court therein considered whether legal malpractice occurred when a claim allegedly filed late by the defendant attorney was still viable when the defendant attorney | (¡withdrew from representation. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Hudspeth v. Smith green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Murphy v. Gilsbar, Inc. green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & Spivak green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Coffey Ex Rel. Collins v. Jefferson County Board of Education green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Couture v. Guillory green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Siegel v. Kranis green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Ferguson v. Burkett green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Carroll v. Wolfe green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Bosworth green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Prestage v. Clark green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| PRESTIGE v. Clark green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Bank of Louisiana v. Mmahat, Duffy, Opotowsky & Walker green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Carter v. Schott neutral | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Penalber v. Blount green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Ault v. Bradley green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.