Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James Yager v. K. William Clauson & a.green2 sentences2019As an initial matter, the plaintiff appears to suggest that we should apply the standard under federal law to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), rather than our standard to prove a legal malpractice claim, see Yager, 166 N.H. at 572-73 , to determine whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to disclose an expert. 2016See Yager, 166 N.H. at 573-74 (eschewing a per se rule that expert witness testimony is not required to prove a breach of the standard of care when a legal malpractice claim is premised upon the failure to file a claim within an applicable statute of limitations). | 2 | 2 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2019As an initial matter, the plaintiff appears to suggest that we should apply the standard under federal law to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), rather than our standard to prove a legal malpractice claim, see Yager, 166 N.H. at 572-73 , to determine whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to disclose an expert. | 1 | 1 |
McIntire v. Leegreen1 sentence2016See McIntire, 149 N.H. at 165-66 . | 1 | 1 |
Porter v. Berallgreen1 sentence2016See Porter v. Berall, 142 F. Supp. 2d 1145, 1147 (W.D. | 1 | 1 |
Estate of Sicotte v. Lubin & Meyer, P.C.green1 sentence2014See id. at 674-75 ; Carbone v. Tierney, 151 N.H. 521, 528 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Carbone v. Tierneygreen1 sentence2014See id. at 674-75 ; Carbone v. Tierney, 151 N.H. 521, 528 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Furbush v. McKittrickgreen1 sentence2010See Furbush, 149 N.H. at 430-31 (holding that although the defendant-attorney did not disclose to the *715 plaintiff his failure to file a claim in a timely manner, the limitations period on the legal malpractice claim began to run when the plaintiff “could reasonably discern that he suffered some harm caused by the defendant’s conduct”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.