7 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Buckley v. Shealygreen2 sentences2025In other words, "[s]ubstantial compliance is not sufficient." Chen, 430 S.C. at 521, 846 S.E.2d at 867; see also Buckley v. Shealy, 370 S.C. 317 , 322 n.2, 635 S.E.2d 76 , 78 n.2 (2006) (finding Rule 43(k) applies even when parties admit to reaching an agreement at mediation because the terms of the rule are mandatory). 2025In other words, "[s]ubstantial compliance is not sufficient." Chen, 430 S.C. at 521, 846 S.E.2d at 867; see also Buckley v. Shealy, 370 S.C. 317 , 322 n.2, 635 S.E.2d 76 , 78 n.2 (2006) (finding Rule 43(k) applies even when parties admit to reaching an agreement at mediation because the terms of the rule are mandatory). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Twiggs
green
2 sentences1965J. 746, Section 483; State v. Twiggs, 123 S. C. 47, 101 S. E. 663 , 31 A. L. 1935J., 746, § 483; State v. Twiggs, 123 S. C., 47, 101 S. E., 663 ; State v. Williams, 35 S. C., 344, 14 S. E., 819 ; State v. Geuing, 1 McCord [573], 574. | 2 | 1935–1965 |
Stogsdill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Beach Co. v. Twillman, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2005Id. 2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Rapley v. Klugh
neutral
1 sentence1951A somewhat later case, which also seems to be directly in point, although the situation of the parties is converse to that in the Cantey case, is that of Rapley v. Klugh, 40 S. C. 134, 18 S. E. 680 , and the ruling of the Court therein is correctly stated in the syllabus as follows: “A plaintiff in the action and one under whom she claims her rights to the land in dispute,. are not incompetent witnesses, under section 400 (now Section 692), of the Code of Procedure, to transactions between them and one now deceased, where the defendant defends as fourth grantee in succession from the executor | 1 | 1951–1951 |
State v. Bagwell
green
1 sentence1937It, therefore, partakes decidedly more of the nature of a civil statute and a civil remedy and trials thereunder should be and are governed by the provisions of the Code with reference to the place of trial of civil actions”— *345 citing State v. Bagwell, 125 S. C., 401, 118 S. E., 767 , as supporting this view. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence1935J., 746, § 483; State v. Twiggs, 123 S. C., 47, 101 S. E., 663 ; State v. Williams, 35 S. C., 344, 14 S. E., 819 ; State v. Geuing, 1 McCord [573], 574. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.