6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Binnsgreen2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 1 | 2 |
Stokes v. Southern States Cooperative, Inc.green1 sentence2023Although his complaint alleges three counts under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with no separate statement of corresponding state-law claims, he invokes this Court’s jurisdiction in part based on 28 U.S.C. § 1367 , which provides for supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims . . . and when he addresses the elements of a malicious prosecution claim in his brief he cites Stokes v. S. States Coop., Inc., 651 F.3d 911, 916 (8th Cir. 2011), which is a diversity case based on Arkansas law . . . . | 1 | 1 |
Michael Klein v. Warren Steinkampgreen1 sentence2023The Eighth Circuit subsequently applied Thompson and analyzed a malicious-prosecution claim under both federal and state law in Klein v. Steinkamp, 44 F.4th 1111, 1115 (8th Cir. 2022). 17 to falsely formulate a pretense of probable cause.7 The court concluded that Turcios was not entitled to relief because his evidence did not prove the acts on which his claims rested. | 1 | 1 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Yarbroughgreen2 sentences2007Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Yarbrough, 284 Ark. 345, 349 , 681 S.W.2d 359, 362 (1984); AMI Civil 2006, No. 413. 2007Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Yarbrough, 284 Ark. 345, 349 , 681 S.W.2d 359, 362 (1984); AMI Civil 2006, No. 413. | 1 | 1 |
Jennings Motors v. Burchfieldgreen2 sentences1996Rev. 340 , 350 (1968)); see also Jennings Motors v. Burchfield, 182 Ark. 1047 , 34 S.W.2d 455 (1931) (holding that it is a complete defense to a malicious prosecution claim if defendant presented to counsel all facts available to defendant). 1996Rev. 340 , 350 (1968)); see also Jennings Motors v. Burchfield, 182 Ark. 1047 , 34 S.W.2d 455 (1931) (holding that it is a complete defense to a malicious prosecution claim if defendant presented to counsel all facts available to defendant). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. Huff
green
1 sentence2015I also agree with the majority that substantial evidence supports the jury’s verdict on the malicious-prosecution claim. 12 Cite as 2015 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.