Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1909–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Republic of Iraq v. ABB AGgreen1 sentence2015See Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG, 769 F. Supp. 2d 605, 610, n.1 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). 7 Cite as 2015 Ark. 58 or counterclaim.” Bigge claims, therefore, that the parties intended for an arbitrator to determine whether a dispute was arbitrable. | 1 | 1 |
Bigge Crane & Rigging Co. v. Entergy Arkansas, Inc.green1 sentence2015See Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG, 769 F. Supp. 2d 605, 610, n.1 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). 7 Cite as 2015 Ark. 58 or counterclaim.” Bigge claims, therefore, that the parties intended for an arbitrator to determine whether a dispute was arbitrable. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016As explained by the arbitrator, Rule 7 of the Rules of the AAA provides that the “arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope, or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the arbitrability of any claim or counterclaim.” In addressing the jurisdictional- questions, the arbitrator explained that the FAA applied to all contracts “evideneirig a transaction involving commerce.” In addressing the basic question of “What is a transaction involving commerce?” the arbitrator cited a 1995 United States Supreme C 2016As explained by the arbitrator, Rule 7 of the Rules of the AAA provides that the “arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope, or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the arbitrability of any claim or counterclaim.” In addressing the jurisdictional- questions, the arbitrator explained that the FAA applied to all contracts “evideneirig a transaction involving commerce.” In addressing the basic question of “What is a transaction involving commerce?” the arbitrator cited a 1995 United States Supreme C | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson
green
2 sentences2016As explained by the arbitrator, Rule 7 of the Rules of the AAA provides that the “arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope, or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the arbitrability of any claim or counterclaim.” In addressing the jurisdictional- questions, the arbitrator explained that the FAA applied to all contracts “evideneirig a transaction involving commerce.” In addressing the basic question of “What is a transaction involving commerce?” the arbitrator cited a 1995 United States Supreme C 2016As explained by the arbitrator, Rule 7 of the Rules of the AAA provides that the “arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope, or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the arbitrability of any claim or counterclaim.” In addressing the jurisdictional- questions, the arbitrator explained that the FAA applied to all contracts “evideneirig a transaction involving commerce.” In addressing the basic question of “What is a transaction involving commerce?” the arbitrator cited a 1995 United States Supreme C | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012More specifically, it incorporates the AAA Rules, which expressly state that the arbitrator “shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope or validity of the arbitration agreement.” Further, the arbitration clause provides for arbitration “to the exclusion of any court of law.” As the First Circuit so determined in Awuah, supra, we also cannot conclude that the inclusion of a severability clause in the contract negates the plain manifestation of intent expressed in the delegation provision. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Layne v. Strode
green
2 sentences2009Layne v. Strode, 229 Ark. 513 , 317 S.W.2d 6 (1958). 2009Layne v. Strode, 229 Ark. 513 , 317 S.W.2d 6 (1958). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Vinsant v. Knox
neutral
1 sentence1912In the amendment carrying to the people this power is the clause in question, “The style of all bills shall be, ‘Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Arkansas.’ ” As long ago as 1871 this court, in Vinsant v. Knox, 27 Ark. 266 , held that the constitutional provision that the style of all bills should be, “Be it Enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas,” was mandatory, and that a bill without this style (or substantially this style) was void, although otherwise regularly passed and approved. . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
United States v. Shipp
green
1 sentence1909United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 709 ; United States v. Shipp, 203 U. S. 563 . | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.