Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1941–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc.green2 sentences2023Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (5th Ed. 1984) § 114, pp. 818– 19. (b) How, if at all, do the power factors enumerated in Kelley v. Bonney, supra, 221 Conn. 567 , and Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc., 271 Conn. 78, 85 , 856 A.2d 372 (2004), apply to the identification of a proceed- ing as quasi-judicial; and, if they do apply, are these factors in addition to; see id.; or independent of, a pre- liminary law to fact requirement? (c) How, if at all, does public policy inform the identi- fication of a proceeding as quasi-judicial, and, if it does, is this consideration i 2023Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (5th Ed. 1984) § 114, pp. 818– 19. (b) How, if at all, do the power factors enumerated in Kelley v. Bonney, supra, 221 Conn. 567 , and Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc., 271 Conn. 78, 85 , 856 A.2d 372 (2004), apply to the identification of a proceed- ing as quasi-judicial; and, if they do apply, are these factors in addition to; see id.; or independent of, a pre- liminary law to fact requirement? (c) How, if at all, does public policy inform the identi- fication of a proceeding as quasi-judicial, and, if it does, is this consideration i | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Compagnie Euralair, S. A. v. General Electric Co.
green
2 sentences2012The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden-tiary standards.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. 2001The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752-53 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. | 4 | 1999–2012 |
Dayton v. United States
green
2 sentences2012The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden-tiary standards.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. 2001The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752-53 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. | 3 | 1999–2012 |
Horvath v. Ohio State Teachers Retirement Board
green
2 sentences2012The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden-tiary standards.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. 2001The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752-53 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. | 3 | 1999–2012 |
State v. Shabazz
green
2 sentences2012The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden-tiary standards.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. 2012The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden-tiary standards.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shabazz, 246 Conn. 746 , 752 n.4, 719 A.2d 440 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1179 , 119 S. Ct. 1116 , 143 L. | 3 | 1999–2012 |
State v. Bova
green
2 sentences2014Id. 1998Id. | 2 | 1998–2014 |
State v. Bridges
green
2 sentences2002The defendant has no right to present evidence that is not admissible according to the rules of evidence . . . .” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). 2002“The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Lisevick
green
2 sentences2002The defendant has no right to present evidence that is not admissible according to the rules of evidence . . . .” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). 2002“The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Bridges
neutral
2 sentences2002“The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). 2002“The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bridges, 65 Conn. App. 517, 524 , 782 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 934 , 785 A.2d 230 (2001). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Domian
green
2 sentences2016The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden- tiary standards.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Romanko, 313 Conn. 140 , 148, 96 A.3d 518 (2014). ‘‘A person is guilty of a capital felony who is convicted of . . . (3) murder committed by one who has pre- viously been convicted of intentional murder . . . .’’ General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-54b. ‘‘A guilty plea is itself a conviction . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Domian, 235 Conn. 679, 686 , 668 A.2d 133 2016The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden- tiary standards.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Romanko, 313 Conn. 140 , 148, 96 A.3d 518 (2014). ‘‘A person is guilty of a capital felony who is convicted of . . . (3) murder committed by one who has pre- viously been convicted of intentional murder . . . .’’ General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-54b. ‘‘A guilty plea is itself a conviction . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Domian, 235 Conn. 679, 686 , 668 A.2d 133 | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Jenkins
green
2 sentences2016The court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of the proffered evidence pursuant to evidentiary standards; hence, the question is evidentiary and not constitutional.... [E]very evidentiary ruling which denies a defendant a line of inquiry to which he thinks he is entitled is not constitutional error." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jenkins, 56 Conn.App. 450 , 455, 743 A.2d 660 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 947 , 747 A.2d 523 (2000). 2016The court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of the proffered evidence pursuant to evidentiary standards; hence, the question is evidentiary and not constitutional.... [E]very evidentiary ruling which denies a defendant a line of inquiry to which he thinks he is entitled is not constitutional error." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jenkins, 56 Conn.App. 450 , 455, 743 A.2d 660 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 947 , 747 A.2d 523 (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Jenkins
neutral
2 sentences2016The court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of the proffered evidence pursuant to evidentiary standards; hence, the question is evidentiary and not constitutional.... [E]very evidentiary ruling which denies a defendant a line of inquiry to which he thinks he is entitled is not constitutional error." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jenkins, 56 Conn.App. 450 , 455, 743 A.2d 660 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 947 , 747 A.2d 523 (2000). 2016The court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of the proffered evidence pursuant to evidentiary standards; hence, the question is evidentiary and not constitutional.... [E]very evidentiary ruling which denies a defendant a line of inquiry to which he thinks he is entitled is not constitutional error." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jenkins, 56 Conn.App. 450 , 455, 743 A.2d 660 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 947 , 747 A.2d 523 (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2016The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden- tiary standards.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Romanko, 313 Conn. 140 , 148, 96 A.3d 518 (2014). ‘‘A person is guilty of a capital felony who is convicted of . . . (3) murder committed by one who has pre- viously been convicted of intentional murder . . . .’’ General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-54b. ‘‘A guilty plea is itself a conviction . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Domian, 235 Conn. 679, 686 , 668 A.2d 133 2016The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional eviden- tiary standards.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Romanko, 313 Conn. 140 , 148, 96 A.3d 518 (2014). ‘‘A person is guilty of a capital felony who is convicted of . . . (3) murder committed by one who has pre- viously been convicted of intentional murder . . . .’’ General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-54b. ‘‘A guilty plea is itself a conviction . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Domian, 235 Conn. 679, 686 , 668 A.2d 133 | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.
green
2 sentences2012Ed. 2d 111 (1999). “[T]he question of the admissibility of the proffered evidence is one of evidentiary, but not constitutional, dimension.” Id., 753 n.4. “[T]he trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to admit or exclude demonstrative evidence.” Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc., 280 Conn. 1, 20 , 905 A.2d 55 (2006). 2012Ed. 2d 111 (1999). “[T]he question of the admissibility of the proffered evidence is one of evidentiary, but not constitutional, dimension.” Id., 753 n.4. “[T]he trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to admit or exclude demonstrative evidence.” Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc., 280 Conn. 1, 20 , 905 A.2d 55 (2006). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Delucia v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation
green
2 sentences2009In Griffing v. Danbury, 41 Conn. 96 (1874), this court held that a Superior Court judge lacked the power to rule on a motion for a new trial, clearly a judicial act, the day after his resignation became effective, and, in DeLucia v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 130 Conn. 467, 473 , 35 A.2d 868 (1944), we concluded that a judge of a town court who ceased to hold office after hearing a case was not authorized to grant a motion for extension of time in which to appeal, also a judicial act. 2009In Griffing v. Danbury, 41 Conn. 96 (1874), this court held that a Superior Court judge lacked the power to rule on a motion for a new trial, clearly a judicial act, the day after his resignation became effective, and, in DeLucia v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 130 Conn. 467, 473 , 35 A.2d 868 (1944), we concluded that a judge of a town court who ceased to hold office after hearing a case was not authorized to grant a motion for extension of time in which to appeal, also a judicial act. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Griffing v. Town of Danbury
green
2 sentences2009In Griffing v. Danbury, 41 Conn. 96 (1874), this court held that a Superior Court judge lacked the power to rule on a motion for a new trial, clearly a judicial act, the day after his resignation became effective, and, in DeLucia v. Home Owners’ Loan Corp., 130 Conn. 467, 473 , 35 A.2d 868 (1944), we concluded that a judge of a town court who ceased to hold office after hearing a case was not authorized to grant a motion for extension of time in which to appeal, also a judicial act. 2009In Griffing v. Danbury, 41 Conn. 96 (1874), this court held that a Superior Court judge lacked the power to rule on a motion for a new trial, clearly a judicial act, the day after his resignation became effective, and, in DeLucia v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 130 Conn. 467, 473 , 35 A.2d 868 (1944), we concluded that a judge of a town court who ceased to hold office after hearing a case was not authorized to grant a motion for extension of time in which to appeal, also a judicial act. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Stevenson
green
2 sentences2008The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stevenson, 53 Conn. App. 551 , 565 n.12, 733 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 917 , 734 A.2d 990 (1999). 2008The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stevenson, 53 Conn. App. 551 , 565 n.12, 733 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 917 , 734 A.2d 990 (1999). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Stevenson
green
2 sentences2008The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stevenson, 53 Conn. App. 551 , 565 n.12, 733 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 917 , 734 A.2d 990 (1999). 2008The trial court retains the power to rule on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to traditional evidentiary standards.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stevenson, 53 Conn. App. 551 , 565 n.12, 733 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 917 , 734 A.2d 990 (1999). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Second Ecclesiastical Society of Hartford v. Attorney General
green
1 sentence1990Second Ecclesiastical Society v. Attorney General, 133 Conn. 89 , 93-94 (1946). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Lockwood v. Killian
green
1 sentence1990Our Supreme Court recognizes the doctrine of approximation (see, for example, Lockwood v. Killian, supra.) and vests exclusively the Superior Court, as a court of equity, with the power to apply the doctrine. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Bristol Baptist Church v. Connecticut Baptist Convention
green
1 sentence1950Shannon v. Eno, 120 Conn. 77 ; Bristol Baptist Church v. Connecticut Baptist Convention, 98 Conn. 677 ; Bridgeport Public Library and Reading Room v. Burroughs Home, 85 Conn. 309 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Shannon v. Eno
green
1 sentence1950Shannon v. Eno, 120 Conn. 77 ; Bristol Baptist Church v. Connecticut Baptist Convention, 98 Conn. 677 ; Bridgeport Public Library and Reading Room v. Burroughs Home, 85 Conn. 309 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Bridgeport Public Library & Reading Room v. Burroughs Home
green
1 sentence1950Shannon v. Eno, 120 Conn. 77 ; Bristol Baptist Church v. Connecticut Baptist Convention, 98 Conn. 677 ; Bridgeport Public Library and Reading Room v. Burroughs Home, 85 Conn. 309 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining Committee
green
2 sentences1941The power of the bar examining committee over the qualifications of candidates for admission has been recently discussed and defined in Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining Committee, 116 Conn. 409, 417 , 165 Atl. 211 . 1941The power of the bar examining committee over the qualifications of candidates for admission has been recently discussed and defined in Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining Committee, 116 Conn. 409, 417 , 165 Atl. 211 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.