6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ishamgreen2 sentences2026We disagree. ¶ 18 “A defendant has no right to raise a constitutional claim after a guilty plea when that claim does not relate directly to the adequacy of the plea.” People v. Isham, 923 P.2d 190, 195 (Colo. App. 1995). 2025See People v. Isham, 923 P.2d 190, 195 (Colo. App. 1995) (“[A] 4 defendant has no right to raise a constitutional claim after a guilty plea when that claim does not relate directly to the adequacy of the plea.”). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Andrewsgreen1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Carlos Cortezgreen1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Mark A. Morgangreen1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 1 |
People v. Owengreen1 sentence2009Defendant cites People v. Owen, 122 P.3d 1006, 1008 (Colo.App.2005), for the general proposition a guilty plea does not bar issues relating to the “unconstitutionality of the statute defining the crime.” Although this is an accurate quotation, there are three reasons why we do not believe that Owen concluded that constitutional as-applied challenges can be raised after guilty pleas. *264 First, such a conclusion would be contrary to Patton . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 19041
green
1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Virginia v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Schneider
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 762 . 2009Id. at 762 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. Jerry Lee Johnston
green
1 sentence2009United States v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (“No court has applied the exception to a claim ... that a statute is unconstitutional as applied.”); United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 , 1019 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999) (“this circuit has held that [jurisdictional] claims are limited to claims that the statute is facially unconstitutional”); United States v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir.1999) (guilty plea barred subsequent as-applied challenge), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 530 U.S. 1201 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 230 (2000), and reinstated with modification, 246 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Von Pickrell v. People
green
1 sentence1995Von Pickrell v. People, 163 Colo, at 595-96, 431 P.2d at 1005 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
United States v. Broce
green
2 sentences1992The United States Supreme Court in United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563 , 109 S.Ct. 757 , 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989) held that a guilty plea could bar a subsequent double jeopardy challenge. 1992The United States Supreme Court in United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563 , 109 S.Ct. 757 , 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989) held that a guilty plea could bar a subsequent double jeopardy challenge. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Chatfield v. Colorado Court of Appeals
green
1 sentence1992Likewise, in Chatfield v. Colorado Court of Appeals, 775 P.2d 1168 (Colo.1989), our supreme court determined that § 18-1-303 is not jurisdictional in nature but provides a complete defense to a subsequent state prosecution within provisions of the statute. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.