Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Stategreen2 sentences2023“In accepting a guilty plea to a violation of probation [or community control], the trial court need not comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172.” Edwards v. State, 721 So. 2d 744, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). 2016Edwards v. State, 721 So. 2d 744, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also Balsinger v. State, 974 So. 2d 592, 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); 5 has not shown manifest injustice, and we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying Arroyo’s motion. | 2 | 2 |
TG v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). | 2 | 2 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Instead, where a defendant enters a plea of admission “the trial court shall, prior to revoking his probation or entering sentence, hold an admission colloquy.” Johnson v. State, 107 So. 3d 1153, 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 4 2013). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Edwards v. State, 721 So.2d 744, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also Balsinger v. State, 974 So.2d 592, 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Johnson v. State, 776 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ("Upon a guilty plea to a probation violation, there is no requirement that a determination be made as to the factual basis of the plea or that the plea was freely and voluntarily given.”). | 1 | 1 |
Balsinger v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Edwards v. State, 721 So. 2d 744, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also Balsinger v. State, 974 So. 2d 592, 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); 5 has not shown manifest injustice, and we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying Arroyo’s motion. 2016Edwards v. State, 721 So.2d 744, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also Balsinger v. State, 974 So.2d 592, 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Johnson v. State, 776 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ("Upon a guilty plea to a probation violation, there is no requirement that a determination be made as to the factual basis of the plea or that the plea was freely and voluntarily given.”). | 1 | 1 |
Barnhill v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., Barnhill v. State, 828 So.2d 405, 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (acknowledging that a defendant may challenge a guilty plea in a rule 3.850 motion based on “allegations regarding the ineffective assistance of defense counsel in counsel’s efforts to represent the defendant during the plea proceedings”) (citation omitted); Howard v. State, 824 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (noting that filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is the appropriate remedy for a defendant whose attorney advised him or her to plead guilty without reserving the right to appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Howard v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., Barnhill v. State, 828 So.2d 405, 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (acknowledging that a defendant may challenge a guilty plea in a rule 3.850 motion based on “allegations regarding the ineffective assistance of defense counsel in counsel’s efforts to represent the defendant during the plea proceedings”) (citation omitted); Howard v. State, 824 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (noting that filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is the appropriate remedy for a defendant whose attorney advised him or her to plead guilty without reserving the right to appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See Allen v. State, 662 So.2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Washington v. State, 284 So.2d 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
JO v. State
green
2 sentences2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Novaton v. State
green
1 sentence2003While it is generally true that a defendant who enters a guilty plea may not challenge his convictions on double jeopardy grounds, an exception exists for situations in which the plea is a general one with no agreement as to the sentence the defendant will receive. [1] See id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
DL v. State
neutral
1 sentence2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Mangual v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
green
1 sentence2000See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 751 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2000); D.L. v. State, 719 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 911 (Fla.1999); J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Washington v. State
green
1 sentence1998See Allen v. State, 662 So.2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Washington v. State, 284 So.2d 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Gunn v. State
green
1 sentence1993Gunn v. State, 612 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.