Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arnold Gates v. United States of America, Felix Melian v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1976See, e.g., Gates v. United States, 515 F.2d 73 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. Bachner v. United States, 517 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1975); hut see Fernandez v. United States, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974); see generally Annot., 8 *514 A.L.R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ermels
green
2 sentences2013See CrR 4.2(f); Ermels, 156 Wn.2d at 540-41 . 8 But even if this were a timely motion, a court will allow a petitioner to withdraw a guilty plea only if it appears “necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” CrR 4.2(f). 2013See CrR 4.2(f); Ermels, 156 Wn.2d at 540-41 . 8 But even ifthis were a timely motion, a court will allow a petitioner to withdraw a guilty plea only if it appears "necessary to correct a manifest injustice." CrR 4.2(f). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Newton
green
2 sentences2026At the guilty plea hearing, the trial court asked Orton whether he signed the plea document, whether defense counsel spoke with him about the document, whether defense 3 State v. Newton, 87 Wn.2d 363, 372 , 552 P.2d 682 (1976). 8 No. 40672-5-III State v. Orton counsel read the content of the document to Orton, and whether defense counsel answered Orton’s questions with respect to the document, all questions to which Orton replied either “Yeah” or “Yes.” RP at 4-5. 2026At the guilty plea hearing, the trial court asked Orton whether he signed the plea document, whether defense counsel spoke with him about the document, whether defense 3 State v. Newton, 87 Wn.2d 363, 372 , 552 P.2d 682 (1976). 8 No. 40672-5-III State v. Orton counsel read the content of the document to Orton, and whether defense counsel answered Orton’s questions with respect to the document, all questions to which Orton replied either “Yeah” or “Yes.” RP at 4-5. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Branch
green
1 sentence2002Branch, 129 Wash.2d at 642 , 919 P.2d 1228 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Branch
green
1 sentence2002Branch, 129 Wash.2d at 642 , 919 P.2d 1228 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Schaupp
green
1 sentence2000At the guilty plea hearing, the prosecutor told the court that “[t]he reason for the reduction ... is because of absent witnesses who are unable to be found who are essential to the prosecution.” Id. at 36 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Wakefield
green
1 sentence2000It compares Mr. Hoisington’s situation to that of the defendant in State v. Wakefield, 130 Wn.2d 464 , 925 P.2d 183 (1996). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Wakefield
green
1 sentence2000It compares Mr. Hoisington’s situation to that of the defendant in State v. Wakefield, 130 Wn.2d 464 , 925 P.2d 183 (1996). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
McCarthy v. United States
green
2 sentences1982CrR 4.2(d). 2 See In re Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 205 , 622 P.2d 360 (1980). 3 As the court said in Keene, quoting from McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 , 22 L. 1982CrR 4.2(d). 2 See In re Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 205 , 622 P.2d 360 (1980). 3 As the court said in Keene, quoting from McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 , 22 L. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene
green
2 sentences1982CrR 4.2(d). 2 See In re Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 205 , 622 P.2d 360 (1980). 3 As the court said in Keene, quoting from McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 , 22 L. 1982CrR 4.2(d). 2 See In re Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 205 , 622 P.2d 360 (1980). 3 As the court said in Keene, quoting from McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 , 22 L. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Anthony Joseph Munich v. United States
green
1 sentence1976See, e.g., Gates v. United States, 515 F.2d 73 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. Bachner v. United States, 517 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1975); hut see Fernandez v. United States, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974); see generally Annot., 8 *514 A.L.R. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
United States v. Frank Richardson
green
1 sentence1976See, e.g., Gates v. United States, 515 F.2d 73 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. Bachner v. United States, 517 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1975); hut see Fernandez v. United States, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974); see generally Annot., 8 *514 A.L.R. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Rafael Narberto Pardo Fernandez v. United States
green
1 sentence1976See, e.g., Gates v. United States, 515 F.2d 73 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. Bachner v. United States, 517 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1975); hut see Fernandez v. United States, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974); see generally Annot., 8 *514 A.L.R. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Frank E. Bachner v. United States of America, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Frank E. Bachner
green
1 sentence1976See, e.g., Gates v. United States, 515 F.2d 73 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973); Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964); cf. Bachner v. United States, 517 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1975); hut see Fernandez v. United States, 492 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1974); see generally Annot., 8 *514 A.L.R. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.