guilty plea waiver in Connecticut

2003Moreover, "the guilty plea is a waiver of constitutional rights — a waiver of non-jurisdictional defenses — and where . . . the record discloses that such an act was voluntary, knowing, intelligent and done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences, the plaintiff's plea of guilty was valid." Consiglio v. Warden , 160 Conn. 151 (1970).

2003Moreover, "the guilty plea is a waiver of constitutional rights — a waiver of non-jurisdictional defenses — and where . . . the record discloses that such an act was voluntary, knowing, intelligent and done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences, . . . the plaintiffs plea of guilty was valid." Consiglio v. Warden , 160 Conn. 151 . (1970).

2009“The Court: And you’ve decided what you think is ultimately based— ultimately is in your best interest based upon your consultation with [defense counsel], the two of you sitting down, and I don’t want to know the contents of what you talked about, that’s not my business, but whatever it is the two of you talked about, you came out of that discussion believing that entering a guilty plea under the doctrine [of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L.

2009“The Court: And you’ve decided what you think is ultimately based— ultimately is in your best interest based upon your consultation with [defense counsel], the two of you sitting down, and I don’t want to know the contents of what you talked about, that’s not my business, but whatever it is the two of you talked about, you came out of that discussion believing that entering a guilty plea under the doctrine [of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L.

2001To allow the defendant now, years after the charges were brought, and after the evidence has been destroyed, to withdraw a plea into which he entered knowingly and voluntarily would be to assert form over substance. 13 See Commonwealth v. Lopez, 426 Mass. 657, 662 , 690 N.E.2d 809 (1998) (“strict standard for postconviction motions promotes judicial efficiency and finality by discouraging a defendant from entering a guilty plea to test the weight of potential punishment” [internal quotation marks omitted]); see also Commonwealth v. Hason, supra, 27 Mass. App. 845 (judges “should only grant a p

2001To allow the defendant now, years after the charges were brought, and after the evidence has been destroyed, to withdraw a plea into which he entered knowingly and voluntarily would be to assert form over substance. 13 See Commonwealth v. Lopez, 426 Mass. 657, 662 , 690 N.E.2d 809 (1998) (“strict standard for postconviction motions promotes judicial efficiency and finality by discouraging a defendant from entering a guilty plea to test the weight of potential punishment” [internal quotation marks omitted]); see also Commonwealth v. Hason, supra, 27 Mass. App. 845 (judges “should only grant a p

2000This court has held, however, “that the trial court’s express mention of waiver of the right to trial, combined with the defendant’s prior election for a jury trial, [the defendant’s] experience with the criminal proceedings and apparently adequate representation by counsel, satisfy the constitutional requirement.” State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412, 420 , 512 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S. Ct. 423 , 93 L.

2000This court has held, however, “that the trial court’s express mention of waiver of the right to trial, combined with the defendant’s prior election for a jury trial, [the defendant’s] experience with the criminal proceedings and apparently adequate representation by counsel, satisfy the constitutional requirement.” State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412, 420 , 512 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S. Ct. 423 , 93 L.

2000This court has held, however, “that the trial court’s express mention of waiver of the right to trial, combined with the defendant’s prior election for a jury trial, [the defendant’s] experience with the criminal proceedings and apparently adequate representation by counsel, satisfy the constitutional requirement.” State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412, 420 , 512 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S. Ct. 423 , 93 L.

2000This court has held, however, “that the trial court’s express mention of waiver of the right to trial, combined with the defendant’s prior election for a jury trial, [the defendant’s] experience with the criminal proceedings and apparently adequate representation by counsel, satisfy the constitutional requirement.” State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412, 420 , 512 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S. Ct. 423 , 93 L.

1979Buckley v. Warden, 177 Conn. 538, 542 , 418 A.2d 913 (1979); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151, 166 , 276 A.2d 773 (1970).

1979Buckley v. Warden, 177 Conn. 538, 542 , 418 A.2d 913 (1979); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151, 166 , 276 A.2d 773 (1970).

1970Id., 748 .