suit violation in North Dakota

6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1909–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
McColl Farms, LLC v. Pflaumgreen nd · 2013 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020In re J.D.F., 2010 ND 160, ¶ 14 , 787 N.W.2d 738 ; see also McColl Farms, LLC v. Pflaum, 2013 ND 169, ¶ 10 , 837 N.W.2d 359 (holding plaintiff did not have standing to raise any issues about whether the court erred in deciding a non-appealing party’s claims on the merits or ordering sanctions). [¶10] “The litigant must have an interest, either in an individual or representative capacity, in the cause of an action, or a legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the subject matter of the controversy in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.” Whitecalfe v. N.D. 2020In re J.D.F., 2010 ND 160, ¶ 14 , 787 N.W.2d 738 ; see also McColl Farms, LLC v. Pflaum, 2013 ND 169, ¶ 10 , 837 N.W.2d 359 (holding plaintiff did not have standing to raise any issues about whether the court erred in deciding a non-appealing party’s claims on the merits or ordering sanctions). [¶10] “The litigant must have an interest, either in an individual or representative capacity, in the cause of an action, or a legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the subject matter of the controversy in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.” Whitecalfe v. N.D.	1	1
State Ex Rel. Aamoth v. Sathregreen nd · 1961 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Id. at 230 . 2012Id. at 230.	1	1
Palmer v. Ohiogreen scotus · 1918 · cited in 1 North Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 2 sentences 1983In Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U.S. 32, 34 , 39 S.Ct. 16 , 63 L.Ed. 108, 109 (1918), the Court stated that “[t]he right of individuals to sue a State, in either a federal or a state court, cannot be derived from the Constitution or laws of the United States. 1983In Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U.S. 32, 34 , 39 S.Ct. 16 , 63 L.Ed. 108, 109 (1918), the Court stated that “[t]he right of individuals to sue a State, in either a federal or a state court, cannot be derived from the Constitution or laws of the United States.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
Matter of J.D.F. green nd · 2010 1 sentence 2020In re J.D.F., 2010 ND 160, ¶ 14 , 787 N.W.2d 738 ; see also McColl Farms, LLC v. Pflaum, 2013 ND 169, ¶ 10 , 837 N.W.2d 359 (holding plaintiff did not have standing to raise any issues about whether the court erred in deciding a non-appealing party’s claims on the merits or ordering sanctions). [¶10] “The litigant must have an interest, either in an individual or representative capacity, in the cause of an action, or a legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the subject matter of the controversy in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.” Whitecalfe v. N.D.	1	2020–2020
Boldt v. State green wis · 1981 2 sentences 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
State v. Green green alaska · 1981 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Edgar v. State green wash · 1979 2 sentences 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701 v. United States green scotus · 1980 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Westmoreland Hospital Ass'n v. Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania green scotus · 1980 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Lamers Dairy, Inc. v. Secretary of Agriculture green scotus · 1980 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
White v. Texas green scotus · 1981 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Boles v. Johnson green scotus · 1981 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Zurek v. Hasten green scotus · 1981 1 sentence 1983Cf. State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381 (Alaska 1981); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217 , 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077 , 100 S.Ct. 1026 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v. State, 101 Wis.2d 566 , 305 N.W.2d 133 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981). 11 Furthermore, several of the Supreme Court’s earlier decisions reviewing actions in State courts against States on constitutional claims appear to support the proposition that a State, notwithstanding the Supremacy Clause, may raise sovereign immunity as a bar to a suit for violation of Federal constitutio	1	1983–1983
Anderson v. Byrne green · 1932 2 sentences 1961Anderson v. Byrne, 62 N.D. 218 , at page 229, 242 N.W. 687 . 1961Anderson v. Byrne, 62 N.D. 218 , at page 229, 242 N.W. 687 .	1	1961–1961
Paulson v. Lyson neutral · 1903 1 sentence 1936The authority of an attorney being revocable at the pleasure of his client, he cannot object to any course the client may choose to take; he does not acquire any vested interest in the cause which is affected by the dismissal of the suit.” In Paulson v. Tyson, supra, this court said that the parties to an action have an absolute right to make settlement, and that “the attorney has no right to question the bona tides of anj"- settlement made between the plaintiff and the defendant.” ( 12 N. D. 357 , 97 N. W. 533 .) Furthermore, in this case there is no claim that the defendant was aware of any	1	1936–1936
Boyd v. Von Neida neutral nd · 1900 2 sentences 1909Boyd v. Von Neida, 9 N. D. 337 , 83 N. W. 329 . 1909Boyd v. Von Neida, 9 N. D. 337 , 83 N. W. 329 .	1	1909–1909

Where else courts name it

TX 176 (1873–2026) LA 94 (1908–2020) IL 51 (1875–2023) GA 41 (1910–2024) CA 36 (1903–2024) AL 35 (1849–2023) FL 35 (1892–2025) NY 32 (1855–2012) MO 30 (1883–2012) MI 27 (1889–2022) MS 20 (1870–2020) NC 19 (1896–2018) PA 19 (1901–2010) IN 19 (1866–2015) TN 17 (1914–2024) OR 15 (1884–2023) MA 15 (1877–2015) IA 13 (1889–2019) SC 13 (1923–2024) WV 12 (1885–2014) AR 12 (1898–2008) KY 11 (1923–2020) VA 11 (1851–2010) NE 10 (1898–2023) OK 9 (1912–2016) CO 8 (1893–2015) KS 8 (1896–1991) ID 8 (1888–1998) CT 8 (1898–2008) OH 7 (2002–2022) NM 7 (1907–2019) MN 7 (1885–2003) ND 6 (1909–2020) NJ 6 (1942–2025) DE 6 (1971–2024) DC 6 (1990–2024) MD 5 (1967–2006) AZ 5 (1925–2012) MT 4 (1950–2014) UT 4 (1983–2024) VT 3 (1910–1915) RI 3 (1886–1985) WA 3 (1872–2017) WY 2 (1931–1983) WI 2 (1933–1934) ME 2 (1915–2020) VI 2 (2023–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check