employment factors in New Jersey

2017If defendant was holding himself out to plaintiff as a representative of CMC, he was holding himself out as acting "in the course of his business, profession or employment, or in any other transaction in which he has a pecuniary interest." Restatement, supra, § 552(1); see id. § 552 cmt. d ("[O]fficers of a corporation, although they receive no personal consideration for giving information concerning its affairs, may have a pecuniary interest 10 Subsequent legislation modified the standard for accountants, N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-25, but did "not affect the application of section 552 to other professi

1986The record disclosed that “[t]he pot stove was furnished by the employer” and “[t]he thing that occurred was connected with the service the employee had to perform in fulfilling his contract * * Id. at 441-442 .

1986On appeal the Supreme Court applied the “sound rule” that “whenever conditions attached to the place of employment or otherwise incident to the employment are factors in the catastrophic combination, the consequent injury arises out of the employment.” Id. at 443 .

1955Mullen v. Walker, 105 N.J.L. 199 ; Price v. Price, 9 N.J.

1952The case is clearly within the language of the amendment of 1924 above quoted, and consequently in a case where the employment is not in violation of any provision of the Factory Act ( Terlingo v. Belz-Parr, Inc., 106 N.J.L. 221 , 147 A. 480 ) and the injured party has elected to resort to the Workmen's Compensation Act for his remedy and there has been an adjudication in his favor in that proceeding, it operates as a bar to further resort to the alternative provision of the statute permitting an action for damages." But, at what juncture is he barred by his election from pursuing the other re

1952The case is clearly within the language of the amendment of 1924 above quoted, and consequently in a case where the employment is not in violation of any provision of the Factory Act ( Terlingo v. Belz-Parr, Inc., 106 N.J.L. 221 , 147 A. 480 ) and the injured party has elected to resort to the Workmen's Compensation Act for his remedy and there has been an adjudication in his favor in that proceeding, it operates as a bar to further resort to the alternative provision of the statute permitting an action for damages." But, at what juncture is he barred by his election from pursuing the other re

1938In Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hospital, 259 N. Y. 137 , it was held: “Whenever conditions attached to the place of employment or otherwise incident to the employment are factors in the catastrophic combination, the consequent injury arises out of the employment.” A case somewhat similar in point is that of Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Commission of Utah, 231 Pac.

1938In Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hospital, 259 N. Y. 137 , it was held: “Whenever conditions attached to the place of employment or otherwise incident to the employment are factors in the catastrophic combination, the consequent injury arises out of the employment.” A case somewhat similar in point is that of Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Commission of Utah, 231 Pac.