Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2015The court in Barker -V- Wango 407 U.S. 514 ; 92 S. Ct 2182 set forth a 4 prong analysis to determine a constitutional speedy trial claim. 2015The court in Barker -V- Wango 407 U.S. 514 ; 92 S. Ct 2182 set forth a 4 prong analysis to determine a constitutional speedy trial claim. | 2 | 1984–2015 |
Leininger v. State
green
2 sentences2008I, § 10, and that the failure to demand a speedy trial in justice court does not act as a waiver of a constitutional speedy-trial claim, see Leininger, 674 S.W.2d at 873 . 2008I, § 10, and that the failure to demand a speedy trial in justice court does not act as a waiver of a constitutional speedy-trial claim, see Leininger , 674 S.W.2d at 873 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Guevara v. State
green
1 sentence2015We find the decision in Guevara v. State, 985 S.W.2d 590 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’d) instructive. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Munoz
green
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.