5 Hawaii opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Desmond v. Administrative Director of the Courtsgreen2 sentences2006Dir. of the Courts, 91 Hawai'i 212, 219 , 982 P.2d 346, 353 (App.1998) [hereinafter “Desmond I”] (advising hearing officers to inform the parties at the beginning of the hearing of the procedure to be followed but not requiring hearing officers to follow the procedure set forth by Appellant), rev’d on other grounds, 90 Hawai'i 301 , 978 P.2d 739 (1999) [hereinafter “Desmond II ”]; (4) the procedure set forth in HRS chapter 291E, Part III, which requires that there be a valid chemical test result or refusal for the ADLRO to have jurisdiction, was disregarded; and (5) the ADLRO Notice of Adminis 2006Dir. of the Courts, 91 Hawai'i 212, 219 , 982 P.2d 346, 353 (App.1998) [hereinafter “Desmond I”] (advising hearing officers to inform the parties at the beginning of the hearing of the procedure to be followed but not requiring hearing officers to follow the procedure set forth by Appellant), rev’d on other grounds, 90 Hawai'i 301 , 978 P.2d 739 (1999) [hereinafter “Desmond II ”]; (4) the procedure set forth in HRS chapter 291E, Part III, which requires that there be a valid chemical test result or refusal for the ADLRO to have jurisdiction, was disregarded; and (5) the ADLRO Notice of Adminis | 4 | 4 |
People v. Greengreen1 sentence2020Rabellizsa, 79 Hawai’i at 350, 903 P.2d at 46 (quoting Green, 609 P.2d at 480). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Desmond v. Administrative Director of the Courts
green
2 sentences2006Dir. of the Courts, 91 Hawai'i 212, 219 , 982 P.2d 346, 353 (App.1998) [hereinafter “Desmond I”] (advising hearing officers to inform the parties at the beginning of the hearing of the procedure to be followed but not requiring hearing officers to follow the procedure set forth by Appellant), rev’d on other grounds, 90 Hawai'i 301 , 978 P.2d 739 (1999) [hereinafter “Desmond II ”]; (4) the procedure set forth in HRS chapter 291E, Part III, which requires that there be a valid chemical test result or refusal for the ADLRO to have jurisdiction, was disregarded; and (5) the ADLRO Notice of Adminis 2006Dir. of the Courts, 91 Hawai'i 212, 219 , 982 P.2d 346, 353 (App.1998) [hereinafter “Desmond I”] (advising hearing officers to inform the parties at the beginning of the hearing of the procedure to be followed but not requiring hearing officers to follow the procedure set forth by Appellant), rev’d on other grounds, 90 Hawai'i 301 , 978 P.2d 739 (1999) [hereinafter “Desmond II ”]; (4) the procedure set forth in HRS chapter 291E, Part III, which requires that there be a valid chemical test result or refusal for the ADLRO to have jurisdiction, was disregarded; and (5) the ADLRO Notice of Adminis | 4 | 2005–2006 |
State v. Rabellizsa
green
1 sentence2020Rabellizsa, 79 Hawai’i at 350, 903 P.2d at 46 (quoting Green, 609 P.2d at 480). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.