Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1889–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Timberlake v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A04-1611-DR-2504 | September 29, 2017 Page 15 of 23 State, 567 N.E.2d 105, 110 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991), trans. denied; see also Timberlake v. State, 690 N.E.2d 243, 256 (Ind. 1997) (“[A] trial judge must be given latitude to run the courtroom and maintain discipline and control of the trial.”), cert. denied (1999). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Renato Torresgreen2 sentences1996United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.1994) (citations omitted). . 1996United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.1994) (citations omitted). [36] See United States v. Baird, 63 F.3d 1213 (3d Cir.1995), where defendant Baird contended that a drug prosecution subsequent to an uncontested administrative forfeiture proceeding arising from the same incident subjected him to double jeopardy, the court observed that "[w]ithout risk of a determination of guilt, jeopardy does not attach.... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. Anderson
neutral
2 sentences1947This is the established doctrine of this court from the beginning.” (authorities) Wright v. Anderson (1889), 117 Ind. 349, 354 , 20 N. E. 247 . 1947This is the established doctrine of this court from the beginning.” (authorities) Wright v. Anderson (1889), 117 Ind. 349, 354 , 20 N. E. 247 . | 2 | 1947–1953 |
Parker v. State
green
1 sentence2017Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A04-1611-DR-2504 | September 29, 2017 Page 15 of 23 State, 567 N.E.2d 105, 110 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991), trans. denied; see also Timberlake v. State, 690 N.E.2d 243, 256 (Ind. 1997) (“[A] trial judge must be given latitude to run the courtroom and maintain discipline and control of the trial.”), cert. denied (1999). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Jason Wilson v. Kelly (Wilson) Myers
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 339 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re AB
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 748 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Zavodnik v. Gehrt
green
1 sentence2013The complaint alleges that “Defendants are residents of Italy, but do business in Indiana and Marion County by email, mail and solicit that business over the Internet” and that “Defendants are doing business as Michela Rinaldi.” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
United States v. Frank L. Baird
green
1 sentence1996United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.1994) (citations omitted). [36] See United States v. Baird, 63 F.3d 1213 (3d Cir.1995), where defendant Baird contended that a drug prosecution subsequent to an uncontested administrative forfeiture proceeding arising from the same incident subjected him to double jeopardy, the court observed that "[w]ithout risk of a determination of guilt, jeopardy does not attach.... | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Zimmerman v. State
green
2 sentences1989Zimmerman, supra; Gallagher, supra. At the beginning of the hearing, Erbecker informed the court that Patton’s guilty plea transcript was unavailable, thus hampering Patton’s ability to present errors that occurred during his guilty plea proceeding. 1989The court asked the State to comment, at which time Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Suzanne Katt called the court’s attention to Zimmerman, supra, and A.R. 7.2(A)(3)(c), noting that this authority describes the procedure to be followed when the transcript of a proceeding has been lost or destroyed. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Matter of Estate of Apple
green
1 sentence1980This is the established doctrine of this court from the beginning.’ Matter of Estate of Apple, (1978) Ind.App., 376 N.E.2d 1172, 1176 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fischli v. Fischli
green
1 sentence1889Fischli v. Fischli, 1 Blackf. 360 ; Richardson v. Jones, 58 Ind. 240 ; Elwood v. Beymer, 100 Ind. 504 ; Vail v. Rinehart, 105 Ind. 6 ; Kurtz v. Carr, 105 Ind. 574 ; Wilson v. Buell, ante, p. 315. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Richardson v. Jones
green
1 sentence1889Fischli v. Fischli, 1 Blackf. 360 ; Richardson v. Jones, 58 Ind. 240 ; Elwood v. Beymer, 100 Ind. 504 ; Vail v. Rinehart, 105 Ind. 6 ; Kurtz v. Carr, 105 Ind. 574 ; Wilson v. Buell, ante, p. 315. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Vail v. Rinehart
neutral
1 sentence1889Fischli v. Fischli, 1 Blackf. 360 ; Richardson v. Jones, 58 Ind. 240 ; Elwood v. Beymer, 100 Ind. 504 ; Vail v. Rinehart, 105 Ind. 6 ; Kurtz v. Carr, 105 Ind. 574 ; Wilson v. Buell, ante, p. 315. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Kurtz v. Carr
neutral
1 sentence1889Fischli v. Fischli, 1 Blackf. 360 ; Richardson v. Jones, 58 Ind. 240 ; Elwood v. Beymer, 100 Ind. 504 ; Vail v. Rinehart, 105 Ind. 6 ; Kurtz v. Carr, 105 Ind. 574 ; Wilson v. Buell, ante, p. 315. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Elwood v. Beymer
neutral
1 sentence1889Fischli v. Fischli, 1 Blackf. 360 ; Richardson v. Jones, 58 Ind. 240 ; Elwood v. Beymer, 100 Ind. 504 ; Vail v. Rinehart, 105 Ind. 6 ; Kurtz v. Carr, 105 Ind. 574 ; Wilson v. Buell, ante, p. 315. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.