5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen1 sentence2020See Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002). 4 On April 6, the supreme court entered an order containing the following provision: Those hearings that are set between April 6, 2020 and June 15, 2020 should either be continued until after June 15, 2020 or should ONLY be conducted by video or phone conferencing. | 1 | 1 |
City of Sioux City v. Siouxland Engineering Associates, P.C.green1 sentence2012See City of Sioux City v. Freese, 611 N.W.2d 777, 779 (Iowa 2000) ("[W]e interpret rules in the same manner we interpret statutes.”). 6 .We note at the outset of our analysis that rule 1.404 governing appearances is inapplicable to the case at bar. | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCowengreen1 sentence1984State v. McCowen, 297 N.W.2d 226, 227 (Iowa 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Dickman v. Truck Transport, Inc.green1 sentence1976Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d at 643 ; Hickman v. Truck Transport, Inc., 224 N.W.2d 459, 466 (Iowa 1974). “ * * * [T]he nature and extent of an emergency is usually a fact question and if the party urging the existence of ‘sudden emergency’ sustains his contention by substantial evidence that such an emergency had developed * * * the jury should be instructed thereon. * * * [citing authorities].” Rice v. McDonald, 258 Iowa 372, 380 , 138 N.W.2d 889, 894 ; Yost v. Miner, 163 N.W.2d at 562-563 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rice v. McDonald
green
2 sentences1976Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d at 643 ; Hickman v. Truck Transport, Inc., 224 N.W.2d 459, 466 (Iowa 1974). “ * * * [T]he nature and extent of an emergency is usually a fact question and if the party urging the existence of ‘sudden emergency’ sustains his contention by substantial evidence that such an emergency had developed * * * the jury should be instructed thereon. * * * [citing authorities].” Rice v. McDonald, 258 Iowa 372, 380 , 138 N.W.2d 889, 894 ; Yost v. Miner, 163 N.W.2d at 562-563 . 1976Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d at 643 ; Hickman v. Truck Transport, Inc., 224 N.W.2d 459, 466 (Iowa 1974). “ * * * [T]he nature and extent of an emergency is usually a fact question and if the party urging the existence of ‘sudden emergency’ sustains his contention by substantial evidence that such an emergency had developed * * * the jury should be instructed thereon. * * * [citing authorities].” Rice v. McDonald, 258 Iowa 372, 380 , 138 N.W.2d 889, 894 ; Yost v. Miner, 163 N.W.2d at 562-563 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Yost v. Miner
green
1 sentence1976Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d at 643 ; Hickman v. Truck Transport, Inc., 224 N.W.2d 459, 466 (Iowa 1974). “ * * * [T]he nature and extent of an emergency is usually a fact question and if the party urging the existence of ‘sudden emergency’ sustains his contention by substantial evidence that such an emergency had developed * * * the jury should be instructed thereon. * * * [citing authorities].” Rice v. McDonald, 258 Iowa 372, 380 , 138 N.W.2d 889, 894 ; Yost v. Miner, 163 N.W.2d at 562-563 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1976Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d at 643 ; Hickman v. Truck Transport, Inc., 224 N.W.2d 459, 466 (Iowa 1974). “ * * * [T]he nature and extent of an emergency is usually a fact question and if the party urging the existence of ‘sudden emergency’ sustains his contention by substantial evidence that such an emergency had developed * * * the jury should be instructed thereon. * * * [citing authorities].” Rice v. McDonald, 258 Iowa 372, 380 , 138 N.W.2d 889, 894 ; Yost v. Miner, 163 N.W.2d at 562-563 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Readlyn Hospital v. Hoth
green
2 sentences1940We said in Readtyn Hospital v. Hoth, 223 Iowa 341, 344 , 272 N. W. 90, 91 , Kintzinger, J., speaking for the court: “Statutes passed for the purpose of exempting property from taxation must be strictly construed, and if there is any doubt upon the question it must be resolved against the exemption and in favor of taxation. 1940We said in Readtyn Hospital v. Hoth, 223 Iowa 341, 344 , 272 N. W. 90, 91 , Kintzinger, J., speaking for the court: “Statutes passed for the purpose of exempting property from taxation must be strictly construed, and if there is any doubt upon the question it must be resolved against the exemption and in favor of taxation. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.